Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Differentiating act from ideology: evidence fro...

Electronic data

  • NCMR Prentice et al

    Rights statement: This is a pre-print of an article published in Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 5 (3), 2012. (c) Wiley.

    Submitted manuscript, 1.69 MB, PDF document


Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Differentiating act from ideology: evidence from messages for and against violent extremism

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

<mark>Journal publication date</mark>08/2012
<mark>Journal</mark>Negotiation and Conflict Management Research
Issue number3
Number of pages18
Pages (from-to)289-306
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English


Although researchers know a great deal about persuasive messages that encourage terrorism, they know far less about persuasive messages that denounce terrorism and little about how these two sides come together. We propose a conceptualization that distinguishes a message’s support for an act from its support for the ideology underlying an act. Our prediction is tested using corpus-linguistic analysis of 250 counter-extremist messages written by Muslims and U.K. officials and a comparison set of 250 Muslim extremist messages. Consistent with our prediction, Muslim extremist and Muslim counter-messages show disagreement on terrorist actions but agreement in ideological aspects, while U.K. officials’ counter-messages show disagreement with both Muslim extremists’ acts and ideology. Our findings suggest that counter-messages should not be viewed as a homogenous group and that being against violent extremism does not necessarily equate to having positive perceptions of Western values.