Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Digital relationships and feminist hope
View graph of relations

Digital relationships and feminist hope

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Published

Standard

Digital relationships and feminist hope. / Ferreday, Debra.
Digital sociology : critical perspectives. ed. / Kate Orton-Johnson; Nick Prior. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Harvard

Ferreday, D 2013, Digital relationships and feminist hope. in K Orton-Johnson & N Prior (eds), Digital sociology : critical perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.

APA

Ferreday, D. (2013). Digital relationships and feminist hope. In K. Orton-Johnson, & N. Prior (Eds.), Digital sociology : critical perspectives Palgrave Macmillan.

Vancouver

Ferreday D. Digital relationships and feminist hope. In Orton-Johnson K, Prior N, editors, Digital sociology : critical perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 2013

Author

Ferreday, Debra. / Digital relationships and feminist hope. Digital sociology : critical perspectives. editor / Kate Orton-Johnson ; Nick Prior. Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

Bibtex

@inbook{94387787075742f1994ffae2c8c53ce0,
title = "Digital relationships and feminist hope",
abstract = "Any critical rethinking of relationships in the digital age involves, in some sense, a {\textquoteleft}speaking back{\textquoteright}. Perhaps more than any other area of studies related to digital media and technologies, this is an area that has historically been characterised by unsubstantiated speculation and sweeping claims which seem almost calculated, in hindsight, to cause consternation to feminists and sociologists alike. Indeed, the study of relationality and subjectivity in online contexts is one area where we might want to be critical of the very notion of a {\textquoteleft}digital age{\textquoteright}. The question for feminist theories of the digital is rather, how do we avoid the notion that the digital represents a huge social revolution which demands an equal transformation in sociological thinking, when so much of what we see in digital spaces remains so dispiritingly familiar? And how does one do this without becoming as negative and reductive as that sentence would seem to suggest?",
author = "Debra Ferreday",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780230222823",
editor = "Kate Orton-Johnson and Nick Prior",
booktitle = "Digital sociology",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Digital relationships and feminist hope

AU - Ferreday, Debra

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Any critical rethinking of relationships in the digital age involves, in some sense, a ‘speaking back’. Perhaps more than any other area of studies related to digital media and technologies, this is an area that has historically been characterised by unsubstantiated speculation and sweeping claims which seem almost calculated, in hindsight, to cause consternation to feminists and sociologists alike. Indeed, the study of relationality and subjectivity in online contexts is one area where we might want to be critical of the very notion of a ‘digital age’. The question for feminist theories of the digital is rather, how do we avoid the notion that the digital represents a huge social revolution which demands an equal transformation in sociological thinking, when so much of what we see in digital spaces remains so dispiritingly familiar? And how does one do this without becoming as negative and reductive as that sentence would seem to suggest?

AB - Any critical rethinking of relationships in the digital age involves, in some sense, a ‘speaking back’. Perhaps more than any other area of studies related to digital media and technologies, this is an area that has historically been characterised by unsubstantiated speculation and sweeping claims which seem almost calculated, in hindsight, to cause consternation to feminists and sociologists alike. Indeed, the study of relationality and subjectivity in online contexts is one area where we might want to be critical of the very notion of a ‘digital age’. The question for feminist theories of the digital is rather, how do we avoid the notion that the digital represents a huge social revolution which demands an equal transformation in sociological thinking, when so much of what we see in digital spaces remains so dispiritingly familiar? And how does one do this without becoming as negative and reductive as that sentence would seem to suggest?

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780230222823

BT - Digital sociology

A2 - Orton-Johnson, Kate

A2 - Prior, Nick

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

CY - Basingstoke

ER -