Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Digitally Mediated Misogyny and Critical Discou...

Electronic data

  • Jess Aiston final

    Accepted author manuscript, 303 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Digitally Mediated Misogyny and Critical Discourse Studies: Methodological and Ethical Implications

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Digitally Mediated Misogyny and Critical Discourse Studies: Methodological and Ethical Implications. / Aiston, Jessica.
In: Modern Languages Open, Vol. 2023, No. 1, 24.02.2023, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Aiston J. Digitally Mediated Misogyny and Critical Discourse Studies: Methodological and Ethical Implications. Modern Languages Open. 2023 Feb 24;2023(1):1-11. doi: 10.3828/mlo.v0i0.454

Author

Aiston, Jessica. / Digitally Mediated Misogyny and Critical Discourse Studies : Methodological and Ethical Implications. In: Modern Languages Open. 2023 ; Vol. 2023, No. 1. pp. 1-11.

Bibtex

@article{e78bc837005e4afd86a62849bae6ef56,
title = "Digitally Mediated Misogyny and Critical Discourse Studies: Methodological and Ethical Implications",
abstract = "The loose network of anti-feminist men{\textquoteright}s websites and social media communities known as the “manosphere” is receiving increasing attention in academia and the mainstream media. However, research into this phenomenon brings notable challenges. For example, because some manosphere communities are known for hostility or even harassment towards women, common guidance for social media research such as gaining informed consent and sharing results with the community may not be viable. In this article, I reflect on some of the major methodological and ethical challenges I have faced during the course of my PhD research into the manosphere and the ways in which my positionality as a female, feminist linguist has impacted my work. I discuss the discourse-historical approach to critical discourse studies and argue that it is a valuable, useful framework for a study of online misogyny due to its principles of triangulation and interdisciplinarity, and its empowerment of the researcher to take a critical, even feminist, stance on controversial issues.",
author = "Jessica Aiston",
year = "2023",
month = feb,
day = "24",
doi = "10.3828/mlo.v0i0.454",
language = "English",
volume = "2023",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Modern Languages Open",
issn = "2052-5397",
publisher = "Liverpool University Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Digitally Mediated Misogyny and Critical Discourse Studies

T2 - Methodological and Ethical Implications

AU - Aiston, Jessica

PY - 2023/2/24

Y1 - 2023/2/24

N2 - The loose network of anti-feminist men’s websites and social media communities known as the “manosphere” is receiving increasing attention in academia and the mainstream media. However, research into this phenomenon brings notable challenges. For example, because some manosphere communities are known for hostility or even harassment towards women, common guidance for social media research such as gaining informed consent and sharing results with the community may not be viable. In this article, I reflect on some of the major methodological and ethical challenges I have faced during the course of my PhD research into the manosphere and the ways in which my positionality as a female, feminist linguist has impacted my work. I discuss the discourse-historical approach to critical discourse studies and argue that it is a valuable, useful framework for a study of online misogyny due to its principles of triangulation and interdisciplinarity, and its empowerment of the researcher to take a critical, even feminist, stance on controversial issues.

AB - The loose network of anti-feminist men’s websites and social media communities known as the “manosphere” is receiving increasing attention in academia and the mainstream media. However, research into this phenomenon brings notable challenges. For example, because some manosphere communities are known for hostility or even harassment towards women, common guidance for social media research such as gaining informed consent and sharing results with the community may not be viable. In this article, I reflect on some of the major methodological and ethical challenges I have faced during the course of my PhD research into the manosphere and the ways in which my positionality as a female, feminist linguist has impacted my work. I discuss the discourse-historical approach to critical discourse studies and argue that it is a valuable, useful framework for a study of online misogyny due to its principles of triangulation and interdisciplinarity, and its empowerment of the researcher to take a critical, even feminist, stance on controversial issues.

U2 - 10.3828/mlo.v0i0.454

DO - 10.3828/mlo.v0i0.454

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2023

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Modern Languages Open

JF - Modern Languages Open

SN - 2052-5397

IS - 1

ER -