Final published version, 124 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Final published version
Licence: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Conference contribution/Paper › peer-review
Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Conference contribution/Paper › peer-review
}
TY - GEN
T1 - Dimensions of Abusive Language on Twitter
AU - Clarke, Isobelle
AU - Grieve, Jack
PY - 2017/8/4
Y1 - 2017/8/4
N2 - In this paper, we use a new categorical form of multidimensional register analysis to identify the main dimensions of functional linguistic variation in a corpus of abusive language, consisting of racist and sexist Tweets. By analysing the use of a wide variety of parts-of-speech and grammatical constructions, as well as various features related to Twitter and computer-mediated communication, we discover three dimensions of linguistic variation in this corpus, which we interpret as being related to the degree of interactive, antagonistic and attitudinal language exhibited by individual Tweets. We then demonstrate that there is a significant functional difference between racist and sexist Tweets, with sexists Tweets tending to be more interactive and attitudinal than racist Tweets.
AB - In this paper, we use a new categorical form of multidimensional register analysis to identify the main dimensions of functional linguistic variation in a corpus of abusive language, consisting of racist and sexist Tweets. By analysing the use of a wide variety of parts-of-speech and grammatical constructions, as well as various features related to Twitter and computer-mediated communication, we discover three dimensions of linguistic variation in this corpus, which we interpret as being related to the degree of interactive, antagonistic and attitudinal language exhibited by individual Tweets. We then demonstrate that there is a significant functional difference between racist and sexist Tweets, with sexists Tweets tending to be more interactive and attitudinal than racist Tweets.
U2 - 10.18653/v1/W17-3001
DO - 10.18653/v1/W17-3001
M3 - Conference contribution/Paper
SP - 1
EP - 10
BT - Proceedings of the First Workshop on Abusive Language Online
A2 - Waseem, Zeerak
A2 - Hui Kyong Chung, Wendy
A2 - Hovy, Dirk
A2 - Tetreault, Joel
PB - Association for Computational Linguistics
CY - Stroudsburg
T2 - First Workshop on Abusive Language Online
Y2 - 4 August 2017 through 4 August 2017
ER -