Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Directional distance functions

Electronic data

  • optimal_directions _final_je_atkinson-tsionas_rev_012315

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Econometrics. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Econometrics, 190, 2, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.06.006

    Accepted author manuscript, 1.46 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Directional distance functions: optimal endogenous directions

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Directional distance functions: optimal endogenous directions. / Atkinson, Scott ; Tsionas, Efthymios.
In: Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 190, No. 2, 02.2016, p. 301-314.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Atkinson S, Tsionas E. Directional distance functions: optimal endogenous directions. Journal of Econometrics. 2016 Feb;190(2):301-314. Epub 2015 Jul 20. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.06.006

Author

Atkinson, Scott ; Tsionas, Efthymios. / Directional distance functions : optimal endogenous directions. In: Journal of Econometrics. 2016 ; Vol. 190, No. 2. pp. 301-314.

Bibtex

@article{e58820e5ad864bc388e2bb841ec55de9,
title = "Directional distance functions: optimal endogenous directions",
abstract = "A substantial literature has dealt with the problem of estimating multiple-input and multiple-output production functions, where inputs and outputs can be good and bad. Numerous studies can be found in the areas of productivity analysis, industrial organization, labor economics, and health economics. While many papers have estimated the more restrictive output- and input-oriented distance functions, here we estimate a more general directional distance function. A seminal paper on directional distance functions by Chambers (1998) as well as papers by F{\"a}re et al. (1997), Chambers et al. (1998), F{\"a}re and Grosskopf (2000), Grosskopf (2003), F{\"a}re et al. (2005), and Hudgins and Primont (2007) do not address the issue of how to choose an optimal direction set. Typically the direction is arbitrarily selected to be 1 for good outputs and −1 for inputs and bad outputs. By estimating the directional distance function together with the first-order conditions for cost minimization and profit maximization using Bayesian methods, we are able to estimate optimal firm-specific directions for each input and output which are consistent with allocative and technical efficiency. We apply these methods to an electric-utility panel data set, which contains firm-specific prices and quantities of good inputs and outputs as well as the quantities of bad inputs and outputs. Estimated firm-specific directions for each input and output are quite different from those normally assumed in the literature. The computed firm-specific technical efficiency, technical change, and productivity change based on estimated optimal directions are substantially higher than those calculated using fixed directions.",
author = "Scott Atkinson and Efthymios Tsionas",
note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Econometrics. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Econometrics, 190, 2, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.06.006",
year = "2016",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.06.006",
language = "English",
volume = "190",
pages = "301--314",
journal = "Journal of Econometrics",
issn = "0304-4076",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Directional distance functions

T2 - optimal endogenous directions

AU - Atkinson, Scott

AU - Tsionas, Efthymios

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Econometrics. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Econometrics, 190, 2, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.06.006

PY - 2016/2

Y1 - 2016/2

N2 - A substantial literature has dealt with the problem of estimating multiple-input and multiple-output production functions, where inputs and outputs can be good and bad. Numerous studies can be found in the areas of productivity analysis, industrial organization, labor economics, and health economics. While many papers have estimated the more restrictive output- and input-oriented distance functions, here we estimate a more general directional distance function. A seminal paper on directional distance functions by Chambers (1998) as well as papers by Färe et al. (1997), Chambers et al. (1998), Färe and Grosskopf (2000), Grosskopf (2003), Färe et al. (2005), and Hudgins and Primont (2007) do not address the issue of how to choose an optimal direction set. Typically the direction is arbitrarily selected to be 1 for good outputs and −1 for inputs and bad outputs. By estimating the directional distance function together with the first-order conditions for cost minimization and profit maximization using Bayesian methods, we are able to estimate optimal firm-specific directions for each input and output which are consistent with allocative and technical efficiency. We apply these methods to an electric-utility panel data set, which contains firm-specific prices and quantities of good inputs and outputs as well as the quantities of bad inputs and outputs. Estimated firm-specific directions for each input and output are quite different from those normally assumed in the literature. The computed firm-specific technical efficiency, technical change, and productivity change based on estimated optimal directions are substantially higher than those calculated using fixed directions.

AB - A substantial literature has dealt with the problem of estimating multiple-input and multiple-output production functions, where inputs and outputs can be good and bad. Numerous studies can be found in the areas of productivity analysis, industrial organization, labor economics, and health economics. While many papers have estimated the more restrictive output- and input-oriented distance functions, here we estimate a more general directional distance function. A seminal paper on directional distance functions by Chambers (1998) as well as papers by Färe et al. (1997), Chambers et al. (1998), Färe and Grosskopf (2000), Grosskopf (2003), Färe et al. (2005), and Hudgins and Primont (2007) do not address the issue of how to choose an optimal direction set. Typically the direction is arbitrarily selected to be 1 for good outputs and −1 for inputs and bad outputs. By estimating the directional distance function together with the first-order conditions for cost minimization and profit maximization using Bayesian methods, we are able to estimate optimal firm-specific directions for each input and output which are consistent with allocative and technical efficiency. We apply these methods to an electric-utility panel data set, which contains firm-specific prices and quantities of good inputs and outputs as well as the quantities of bad inputs and outputs. Estimated firm-specific directions for each input and output are quite different from those normally assumed in the literature. The computed firm-specific technical efficiency, technical change, and productivity change based on estimated optimal directions are substantially higher than those calculated using fixed directions.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.06.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.06.006

M3 - Journal article

VL - 190

SP - 301

EP - 314

JO - Journal of Econometrics

JF - Journal of Econometrics

SN - 0304-4076

IS - 2

ER -