Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Qualitative Research, 16 (5), 2016, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2016 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Qualitative Research page: http://qrj.sagepub.com/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://online.sagepub.com/
Accepted author manuscript, 417 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Dirty secrets and being ‘strange’
T2 - using ethnomethodology to fight familiarity
AU - Morriss, Lisa
N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Qualitative Research, 16, 5, 2016, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2016 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Qualitative Research page: http://qrj.sagepub.com/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://online.sagepub.com/
PY - 2016/9/1
Y1 - 2016/9/1
N2 - The paper is a discussion of my attempt to move beyond familiarity by using ethnomethodology – and the emotional impact of doing so; namely, the feeling of having a ‘dirty secret’. As a social work group member interviewing social workers, the process of fieldwork was all too familiar. However, during transcription and analysis, what I had considered to be ‘business as usual’ was revealed as something more complex. The paper describes how the ethnomethodological notions of being a member, the unique adequacy requirement of methods, and breaching worked to make the familiar strange and became key to my understanding.
AB - The paper is a discussion of my attempt to move beyond familiarity by using ethnomethodology – and the emotional impact of doing so; namely, the feeling of having a ‘dirty secret’. As a social work group member interviewing social workers, the process of fieldwork was all too familiar. However, during transcription and analysis, what I had considered to be ‘business as usual’ was revealed as something more complex. The paper describes how the ethnomethodological notions of being a member, the unique adequacy requirement of methods, and breaching worked to make the familiar strange and became key to my understanding.
KW - emotions in qualitative research
KW - ethnomethodology
KW - familiarity
KW - insider research
U2 - 10.1177/1468794115598194
DO - 10.1177/1468794115598194
M3 - Journal article
VL - 16
SP - 526
EP - 540
JO - Qualitative Research
JF - Qualitative Research
SN - 1468-7941
IS - 5
ER -