Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Discourse-sensitive clitic-doubled dislocations...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Discourse-sensitive clitic-doubled dislocations in heritage Spanish

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Discourse-sensitive clitic-doubled dislocations in heritage Spanish. / Leal Méndez, Tania; Rothman, Jason; Slabakova, Roumyana.
In: Lingua, Vol. 155, 01.02.2015, p. 85-97.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Leal Méndez T, Rothman J, Slabakova R. Discourse-sensitive clitic-doubled dislocations in heritage Spanish. Lingua. 2015 Feb 1;155:85-97. Epub 2014 Feb 21. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.01.002

Author

Leal Méndez, Tania ; Rothman, Jason ; Slabakova, Roumyana. / Discourse-sensitive clitic-doubled dislocations in heritage Spanish. In: Lingua. 2015 ; Vol. 155. pp. 85-97.

Bibtex

@article{62278fd32db74f94a5aebdde5df12ad5,
title = "Discourse-sensitive clitic-doubled dislocations in heritage Spanish",
abstract = "This experimental study tests the predictions of the Interface Hypothesis (Sorace, 2011, 2012) using two constructions whose appropriateness depends on monitoring discourse information: Clitic Left Dislocation and Fronted Focus. Clitic Left Dislocation relates a dislocated and clitic-doubled object to an antecedent activated in previous discourse, while Fronted Focus does not relate the fronted constituent to a discourse antecedent. The Interface Hypothesis argues that speakers in language contact situations experience difficulties when they have to integrate syntactic with discourse information. We tested four groups of native speakers on these constructions: Spanish monolinguals, bilinguals with more than 7 years residence in the US, intermediate and advanced proficiency heritage speakers. Our findings suggest that attrition has not set in the adult L2 bilingual speakers, and that the heritage speakers perform similarly to the monolingual and the adult sequential bilingual natives.",
keywords = "Clitics, Heritage speakers, Interface hypothesis, Spanish, Syntax-discourse",
author = "{Leal M{\'e}ndez}, Tania and Jason Rothman and Roumyana Slabakova",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2014 Elsevier B.V.",
year = "2015",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.lingua.2014.01.002",
language = "English",
volume = "155",
pages = "85--97",
journal = "Lingua",
issn = "0024-3841",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discourse-sensitive clitic-doubled dislocations in heritage Spanish

AU - Leal Méndez, Tania

AU - Rothman, Jason

AU - Slabakova, Roumyana

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2014 Elsevier B.V.

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - This experimental study tests the predictions of the Interface Hypothesis (Sorace, 2011, 2012) using two constructions whose appropriateness depends on monitoring discourse information: Clitic Left Dislocation and Fronted Focus. Clitic Left Dislocation relates a dislocated and clitic-doubled object to an antecedent activated in previous discourse, while Fronted Focus does not relate the fronted constituent to a discourse antecedent. The Interface Hypothesis argues that speakers in language contact situations experience difficulties when they have to integrate syntactic with discourse information. We tested four groups of native speakers on these constructions: Spanish monolinguals, bilinguals with more than 7 years residence in the US, intermediate and advanced proficiency heritage speakers. Our findings suggest that attrition has not set in the adult L2 bilingual speakers, and that the heritage speakers perform similarly to the monolingual and the adult sequential bilingual natives.

AB - This experimental study tests the predictions of the Interface Hypothesis (Sorace, 2011, 2012) using two constructions whose appropriateness depends on monitoring discourse information: Clitic Left Dislocation and Fronted Focus. Clitic Left Dislocation relates a dislocated and clitic-doubled object to an antecedent activated in previous discourse, while Fronted Focus does not relate the fronted constituent to a discourse antecedent. The Interface Hypothesis argues that speakers in language contact situations experience difficulties when they have to integrate syntactic with discourse information. We tested four groups of native speakers on these constructions: Spanish monolinguals, bilinguals with more than 7 years residence in the US, intermediate and advanced proficiency heritage speakers. Our findings suggest that attrition has not set in the adult L2 bilingual speakers, and that the heritage speakers perform similarly to the monolingual and the adult sequential bilingual natives.

KW - Clitics

KW - Heritage speakers

KW - Interface hypothesis

KW - Spanish

KW - Syntax-discourse

U2 - 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.01.002

DO - 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.01.002

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84923934031

VL - 155

SP - 85

EP - 97

JO - Lingua

JF - Lingua

SN - 0024-3841

ER -