Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Discriminatory discursive strategies in online ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Discriminatory discursive strategies in online comments on YouTube videos on the Hong Kong Umbrella Movement by Mainland and Hong Kong Chinese

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Discriminatory discursive strategies in online comments on YouTube videos on the Hong Kong Umbrella Movement by Mainland and Hong Kong Chinese. / Chen, M.; Flowerdew, J.
In: Discourse and Society, Vol. 30, No. 6, 01.11.2019, p. 549-572.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Chen M, Flowerdew J. Discriminatory discursive strategies in online comments on YouTube videos on the Hong Kong Umbrella Movement by Mainland and Hong Kong Chinese. Discourse and Society. 2019 Nov 1;30(6):549-572. Epub 2019 Aug 28. doi: 10.1177/0957926519870046

Author

Bibtex

@article{cdc4466a06a74931a41054f608557f09,
title = "Discriminatory discursive strategies in online comments on YouTube videos on the Hong Kong Umbrella Movement by Mainland and Hong Kong Chinese",
abstract = "This article examines the discriminatory discursive strategies adopted in the online interactions between different power groups from Mainland China and Hong Kong in their response to two YouTube videos about the Hong Kong Umbrella, or Occupy Central, Movement. A corpus of 4329 comments made by 2157 posters from Mainland China and Hong Kong was coded regarding commenters' place of residence and their perceptions of the Umbrella Movement and then tagged based on Flowerdew et al.'s previous taxonomy of discriminatory discursive strategies. The results show that a wide range of discriminatory discursive strategies, used by two power groups from Hong Kong and one from the Mainland, were found in the majority of the comments, including four sub-strategies not identified by Flowerdew et al. While studies to date on the Umbrella Movement have mainly focused on Hong Kong data, our study contributes to the literature by adding the perspective from Mainland China. The findings of this study provide insights into the increasing social and political tensions between Hong Kong and its mother country as well as the current situation in the divided city.",
keywords = "China, critical discourse analysis, critical discourse analysis in historiography, discriminatory discursive strategies, Hong Kong, identity, Occupy Central movement, Umbrella Movement",
author = "M. Chen and J. Flowerdew",
year = "2019",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0957926519870046",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "549--572",
journal = "Discourse and Society",
issn = "0957-9265",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discriminatory discursive strategies in online comments on YouTube videos on the Hong Kong Umbrella Movement by Mainland and Hong Kong Chinese

AU - Chen, M.

AU - Flowerdew, J.

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - This article examines the discriminatory discursive strategies adopted in the online interactions between different power groups from Mainland China and Hong Kong in their response to two YouTube videos about the Hong Kong Umbrella, or Occupy Central, Movement. A corpus of 4329 comments made by 2157 posters from Mainland China and Hong Kong was coded regarding commenters' place of residence and their perceptions of the Umbrella Movement and then tagged based on Flowerdew et al.'s previous taxonomy of discriminatory discursive strategies. The results show that a wide range of discriminatory discursive strategies, used by two power groups from Hong Kong and one from the Mainland, were found in the majority of the comments, including four sub-strategies not identified by Flowerdew et al. While studies to date on the Umbrella Movement have mainly focused on Hong Kong data, our study contributes to the literature by adding the perspective from Mainland China. The findings of this study provide insights into the increasing social and political tensions between Hong Kong and its mother country as well as the current situation in the divided city.

AB - This article examines the discriminatory discursive strategies adopted in the online interactions between different power groups from Mainland China and Hong Kong in their response to two YouTube videos about the Hong Kong Umbrella, or Occupy Central, Movement. A corpus of 4329 comments made by 2157 posters from Mainland China and Hong Kong was coded regarding commenters' place of residence and their perceptions of the Umbrella Movement and then tagged based on Flowerdew et al.'s previous taxonomy of discriminatory discursive strategies. The results show that a wide range of discriminatory discursive strategies, used by two power groups from Hong Kong and one from the Mainland, were found in the majority of the comments, including four sub-strategies not identified by Flowerdew et al. While studies to date on the Umbrella Movement have mainly focused on Hong Kong data, our study contributes to the literature by adding the perspective from Mainland China. The findings of this study provide insights into the increasing social and political tensions between Hong Kong and its mother country as well as the current situation in the divided city.

KW - China

KW - critical discourse analysis

KW - critical discourse analysis in historiography

KW - discriminatory discursive strategies

KW - Hong Kong

KW - identity

KW - Occupy Central movement

KW - Umbrella Movement

U2 - 10.1177/0957926519870046

DO - 10.1177/0957926519870046

M3 - Journal article

VL - 30

SP - 549

EP - 572

JO - Discourse and Society

JF - Discourse and Society

SN - 0957-9265

IS - 6

ER -