Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Disease and Psychological Status in Ankylosing ...
View graph of relations

Disease and Psychological Status in Ankylosing Spondylitis

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Disease and Psychological Status in Ankylosing Spondylitis. / Martindale, Jane; Smith, Jane; Grennan, David et al.
In: Rheumatology, Vol. 45, No. 10, 10.2006, p. 1288 - 1293.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Martindale, J, Smith, J, Grennan, D, Goodacre, L & Goodacre, J 2006, 'Disease and Psychological Status in Ankylosing Spondylitis', Rheumatology, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 1288 - 1293. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kel115

APA

Martindale, J., Smith, J., Grennan, D., Goodacre, L., & Goodacre, J. (2006). Disease and Psychological Status in Ankylosing Spondylitis. Rheumatology, 45(10), 1288 - 1293. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kel115

Vancouver

Martindale J, Smith J, Grennan D, Goodacre L, Goodacre J. Disease and Psychological Status in Ankylosing Spondylitis. Rheumatology. 2006 Oct;45(10):1288 - 1293. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel115

Author

Martindale, Jane ; Smith, Jane ; Grennan, David et al. / Disease and Psychological Status in Ankylosing Spondylitis. In: Rheumatology. 2006 ; Vol. 45, No. 10. pp. 1288 - 1293.

Bibtex

@article{e73ce5ad3bc048c2b391af3acceef29e,
title = "Disease and Psychological Status in Ankylosing Spondylitis",
abstract = "Objectives. Psychological factors may be important in the assessment and management of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Our primary objective was to describe associations between disease and psychological status in AS, using AS-specific assessment tools and questionnaires. Our secondary objectives were to identify patient subgroups based on such associations and to determine the stability of the measures over time.Methods. A total of 110 patients were assessed at 6-monthly intervals up to four times using tools to measure disease [Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)], psychological [Hospital Anxiety and Depression Questionnaire (HADS), Health Locus of Control—Form C Questionnaire (HLC-C)] and generic health [Short form (SF)-36] status.Results. Eighty-nine participants completed all four assessments. Throughout the study, BASDAI, BASFI and BASMI scores correlated significantly with anxiety, depression, internality and health status, but not with levels of belief in chance or powerful others. Clinically anxious or depressed subgroups had significantly worse BASDAI and BASFI, but not BASMI, scores. BASMI scores were the least closely linked to psychological status. Mean scores for disease, psychological and health status were clinically stable over the 18 months period.Conclusions. Disease status scores in AS correlated significantly with anxiety, depression, internality and health status. Interpretation of AS disease scores should take an account of psychological status and the choice of measures used. These findings have important potential applications in AS management and monitoring, including the identification of patients for biological therapies.",
keywords = "Ankylosing Spondylitis, Disease activitiy, psychological status",
author = "Jane Martindale and Jane Smith and David Grennan and Lynne Goodacre and John Goodacre",
year = "2006",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1093/rheumatology/kel115",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "1288 -- 1293",
journal = "Rheumatology",
issn = "1462-0324",
publisher = "OXFORD UNIV PRESS",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disease and Psychological Status in Ankylosing Spondylitis

AU - Martindale, Jane

AU - Smith, Jane

AU - Grennan, David

AU - Goodacre, Lynne

AU - Goodacre, John

PY - 2006/10

Y1 - 2006/10

N2 - Objectives. Psychological factors may be important in the assessment and management of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Our primary objective was to describe associations between disease and psychological status in AS, using AS-specific assessment tools and questionnaires. Our secondary objectives were to identify patient subgroups based on such associations and to determine the stability of the measures over time.Methods. A total of 110 patients were assessed at 6-monthly intervals up to four times using tools to measure disease [Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)], psychological [Hospital Anxiety and Depression Questionnaire (HADS), Health Locus of Control—Form C Questionnaire (HLC-C)] and generic health [Short form (SF)-36] status.Results. Eighty-nine participants completed all four assessments. Throughout the study, BASDAI, BASFI and BASMI scores correlated significantly with anxiety, depression, internality and health status, but not with levels of belief in chance or powerful others. Clinically anxious or depressed subgroups had significantly worse BASDAI and BASFI, but not BASMI, scores. BASMI scores were the least closely linked to psychological status. Mean scores for disease, psychological and health status were clinically stable over the 18 months period.Conclusions. Disease status scores in AS correlated significantly with anxiety, depression, internality and health status. Interpretation of AS disease scores should take an account of psychological status and the choice of measures used. These findings have important potential applications in AS management and monitoring, including the identification of patients for biological therapies.

AB - Objectives. Psychological factors may be important in the assessment and management of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Our primary objective was to describe associations between disease and psychological status in AS, using AS-specific assessment tools and questionnaires. Our secondary objectives were to identify patient subgroups based on such associations and to determine the stability of the measures over time.Methods. A total of 110 patients were assessed at 6-monthly intervals up to four times using tools to measure disease [Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)], psychological [Hospital Anxiety and Depression Questionnaire (HADS), Health Locus of Control—Form C Questionnaire (HLC-C)] and generic health [Short form (SF)-36] status.Results. Eighty-nine participants completed all four assessments. Throughout the study, BASDAI, BASFI and BASMI scores correlated significantly with anxiety, depression, internality and health status, but not with levels of belief in chance or powerful others. Clinically anxious or depressed subgroups had significantly worse BASDAI and BASFI, but not BASMI, scores. BASMI scores were the least closely linked to psychological status. Mean scores for disease, psychological and health status were clinically stable over the 18 months period.Conclusions. Disease status scores in AS correlated significantly with anxiety, depression, internality and health status. Interpretation of AS disease scores should take an account of psychological status and the choice of measures used. These findings have important potential applications in AS management and monitoring, including the identification of patients for biological therapies.

KW - Ankylosing Spondylitis

KW - Disease activitiy

KW - psychological status

U2 - 10.1093/rheumatology/kel115

DO - 10.1093/rheumatology/kel115

M3 - Journal article

VL - 45

SP - 1288

EP - 1293

JO - Rheumatology

JF - Rheumatology

SN - 1462-0324

IS - 10

ER -