Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Disentangling the response of fishes to recreat...

Electronic data

  • Cresswell et al._final

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Biological Conservation. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Biological Conservation, 237, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.06.023

    Accepted author manuscript, 3.93 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Disentangling the response of fishes to recreational fishing over 30 years within a fringing coral reef reserve network

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Disentangling the response of fishes to recreational fishing over 30 years within a fringing coral reef reserve network. / Cresswell, A.K.; Langlois, T.J.; Wilson, S.K. et al.

In: Biological Conservation, Vol. 237, 01.09.2019, p. 514-524.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Cresswell, AK, Langlois, TJ, Wilson, SK, Claudet, J, Thomson, DP, Renton, M, Fulton, CJ, Fisher, R, Vanderklift, MA, Babcock, RC, Stuart-Smith, RD, Haywood, MDE, Depczynski, M, Westera, M, Ayling, AM, Fitzpatrick, B, Halford, AR, McLean, DL, Pillans, RD, Cheal, AJ, Tinkler, P, Edgar, GJ, Graham, NAJ, Harvey, ES & Holmes, TH 2019, 'Disentangling the response of fishes to recreational fishing over 30 years within a fringing coral reef reserve network', Biological Conservation, vol. 237, pp. 514-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.06.023

APA

Cresswell, A. K., Langlois, T. J., Wilson, S. K., Claudet, J., Thomson, D. P., Renton, M., Fulton, C. J., Fisher, R., Vanderklift, M. A., Babcock, R. C., Stuart-Smith, R. D., Haywood, M. D. E., Depczynski, M., Westera, M., Ayling, A. M., Fitzpatrick, B., Halford, A. R., McLean, D. L., Pillans, R. D., ... Holmes, T. H. (2019). Disentangling the response of fishes to recreational fishing over 30 years within a fringing coral reef reserve network. Biological Conservation, 237, 514-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.06.023

Vancouver

Cresswell AK, Langlois TJ, Wilson SK, Claudet J, Thomson DP, Renton M et al. Disentangling the response of fishes to recreational fishing over 30 years within a fringing coral reef reserve network. Biological Conservation. 2019 Sep 1;237:514-524. Epub 2019 Aug 2. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.06.023

Author

Cresswell, A.K. ; Langlois, T.J. ; Wilson, S.K. et al. / Disentangling the response of fishes to recreational fishing over 30 years within a fringing coral reef reserve network. In: Biological Conservation. 2019 ; Vol. 237. pp. 514-524.

Bibtex

@article{1b3e6194ce354e86b43b84efd83e96aa,
title = "Disentangling the response of fishes to recreational fishing over 30 years within a fringing coral reef reserve network",
abstract = "Few studies assess the effects of recreational fishing in isolation from commercial fishing. We used meta-analysis to synthesise 4444 samples from 30 years (1987–2017) of fish surveys inside and outside a large network of highly protected reserves in the Ningaloo Marine Park, Western Australia, where the major fishing activity is recreational. Data were collected by different agencies, using varied survey designs and sampling methods. We contrasted the relative abundance and biomass of target and non-target fish groups between fished and reserve locations. We considered the influence of, and possible interactions between, seven additional variables: age and size of reserve, one of two reserve network configurations, reef habitat type, recreational fishing activity, shore-based fishing regulations and survey method. Taxa responded differently: the abundance and biomass inside reserves relative to outside was higher for targeted lethrinids, while other targeted (and non-targeted) fish groups were indistinguishable. Reef habitat was important for explaining lethrinid response to protection, and this factor interacted with reserve size, such that larger reserves were demonstrably more effective in the back reef and lagoon habitats. There was little evidence of changes in relative abundance and biomass of fishes with reserve age, or after rezoning and expansion of the reserve network. Our study demonstrates the complexities in quantifying fishing effects, highlighting some of the key factors and interactions that likely underlie the varied results in reserve assessments that should be considered in future reserve design and assessment.",
keywords = "Marine protected area, MPA, Fisheries, Coral reef, Ningaloo, Adaptive management, Recreational fishing, Lethrinus",
author = "A.K. Cresswell and T.J. Langlois and S.K. Wilson and J. Claudet and D.P. Thomson and M. Renton and C.J. Fulton and R. Fisher and M.A. Vanderklift and R.C. Babcock and R.D. Stuart-Smith and M.D.E. Haywood and M. Depczynski and M. Westera and A.M. Ayling and B. Fitzpatrick and A.R. Halford and D.L. McLean and R.D. Pillans and A.J. Cheal and P. Tinkler and G.J. Edgar and N.A.J. Graham and E.S. Harvey and T.H. Holmes",
note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Biological Conservation. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Biological Conservation, 237, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.06.023",
year = "2019",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.biocon.2019.06.023",
language = "English",
volume = "237",
pages = "514--524",
journal = "Biological Conservation",
issn = "0006-3207",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disentangling the response of fishes to recreational fishing over 30 years within a fringing coral reef reserve network

AU - Cresswell, A.K.

AU - Langlois, T.J.

AU - Wilson, S.K.

AU - Claudet, J.

AU - Thomson, D.P.

AU - Renton, M.

AU - Fulton, C.J.

AU - Fisher, R.

AU - Vanderklift, M.A.

AU - Babcock, R.C.

AU - Stuart-Smith, R.D.

AU - Haywood, M.D.E.

AU - Depczynski, M.

AU - Westera, M.

AU - Ayling, A.M.

AU - Fitzpatrick, B.

AU - Halford, A.R.

AU - McLean, D.L.

AU - Pillans, R.D.

AU - Cheal, A.J.

AU - Tinkler, P.

AU - Edgar, G.J.

AU - Graham, N.A.J.

AU - Harvey, E.S.

AU - Holmes, T.H.

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Biological Conservation. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Biological Conservation, 237, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.06.023

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - Few studies assess the effects of recreational fishing in isolation from commercial fishing. We used meta-analysis to synthesise 4444 samples from 30 years (1987–2017) of fish surveys inside and outside a large network of highly protected reserves in the Ningaloo Marine Park, Western Australia, where the major fishing activity is recreational. Data were collected by different agencies, using varied survey designs and sampling methods. We contrasted the relative abundance and biomass of target and non-target fish groups between fished and reserve locations. We considered the influence of, and possible interactions between, seven additional variables: age and size of reserve, one of two reserve network configurations, reef habitat type, recreational fishing activity, shore-based fishing regulations and survey method. Taxa responded differently: the abundance and biomass inside reserves relative to outside was higher for targeted lethrinids, while other targeted (and non-targeted) fish groups were indistinguishable. Reef habitat was important for explaining lethrinid response to protection, and this factor interacted with reserve size, such that larger reserves were demonstrably more effective in the back reef and lagoon habitats. There was little evidence of changes in relative abundance and biomass of fishes with reserve age, or after rezoning and expansion of the reserve network. Our study demonstrates the complexities in quantifying fishing effects, highlighting some of the key factors and interactions that likely underlie the varied results in reserve assessments that should be considered in future reserve design and assessment.

AB - Few studies assess the effects of recreational fishing in isolation from commercial fishing. We used meta-analysis to synthesise 4444 samples from 30 years (1987–2017) of fish surveys inside and outside a large network of highly protected reserves in the Ningaloo Marine Park, Western Australia, where the major fishing activity is recreational. Data were collected by different agencies, using varied survey designs and sampling methods. We contrasted the relative abundance and biomass of target and non-target fish groups between fished and reserve locations. We considered the influence of, and possible interactions between, seven additional variables: age and size of reserve, one of two reserve network configurations, reef habitat type, recreational fishing activity, shore-based fishing regulations and survey method. Taxa responded differently: the abundance and biomass inside reserves relative to outside was higher for targeted lethrinids, while other targeted (and non-targeted) fish groups were indistinguishable. Reef habitat was important for explaining lethrinid response to protection, and this factor interacted with reserve size, such that larger reserves were demonstrably more effective in the back reef and lagoon habitats. There was little evidence of changes in relative abundance and biomass of fishes with reserve age, or after rezoning and expansion of the reserve network. Our study demonstrates the complexities in quantifying fishing effects, highlighting some of the key factors and interactions that likely underlie the varied results in reserve assessments that should be considered in future reserve design and assessment.

KW - Marine protected area

KW - MPA

KW - Fisheries

KW - Coral reef

KW - Ningaloo

KW - Adaptive management

KW - Recreational fishing

KW - Lethrinus

U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.06.023

DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.06.023

M3 - Journal article

VL - 237

SP - 514

EP - 524

JO - Biological Conservation

JF - Biological Conservation

SN - 0006-3207

ER -