Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Distinct responses of soil respiration to exper...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Distinct responses of soil respiration to experimental litter manipulation in temperate woodland and tropical forest

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Distinct responses of soil respiration to experimental litter manipulation in temperate woodland and tropical forest. / Brechet, Laetitia Magali; Lopez-Sangil, Luis; George, Charles et al.
In: Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 8, No. 7, 04.2018, p. 3787-3796.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Brechet LM, Lopez-Sangil L, George C, Birkett AJ, Baxendale CL, Trujillo BC et al. Distinct responses of soil respiration to experimental litter manipulation in temperate woodland and tropical forest. Ecology and Evolution. 2018 Apr;8(7):3787-3796. Epub 2018 Mar 13. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3945

Author

Bibtex

@article{408f0b2248934131a7d2b672278d0459,
title = "Distinct responses of soil respiration to experimental litter manipulation in temperate woodland and tropical forest",
abstract = "Global change is affecting primary productivity in forests worldwide, and this, in turn, will alter long‐term carbon (C) sequestration in wooded ecosystems. On one hand, increased primary productivity, for example, in response to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2), can result in greater inputs of organic matter to the soil, which could increase C sequestration belowground. On other hand, many of the interactions between plants and microorganisms that determine soil C dynamics are poorly characterized, and additional inputs of plant material, such as leaf litter, can result in the mineralization of soil organic matter, and the release of soil C as CO2 during so‐called “priming effects”. Until now, very few studies made direct comparison of changes in soil C dynamics in response to altered plant inputs in different wooded ecosystems. We addressed this with a cross‐continental study with litter removal and addition treatments in a temperate woodland (Wytham Woods) and lowland tropical forest (Gigante forest) to compare the consequences of increased litterfall on soil respiration in two distinct wooded ecosystems. Mean soil respiration was almost twice as high at Gigante (5.0 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1) than at Wytham (2.7 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1) but surprisingly, litter manipulation treatments had a greater and more immediate effect on soil respiration at Wytham. We measured a 30% increase in soil respiration in response to litter addition treatments at Wytham, compared to a 10% increase at Gigante. Importantly, despite higher soil respiration rates at Gigante, priming effects were stronger and more consistent at Wytham. Our results suggest that in situ priming effects in wooded ecosystems track seasonality in litterfall and soil respiration but the amount of soil C released by priming is not proportional to rates of soil respiration. Instead, priming effects may be promoted by larger inputs of organic matter combined with slower turnover rates.",
keywords = "fine root biomass , forest ecosystems, litter manipulation, microbial biomass, priming effects, soil carbon dynamics",
author = "Brechet, {Laetitia Magali} and Luis Lopez-Sangil and Charles George and Birkett, {Alison Jane} and Baxendale, {Catherine Louise} and Trujillo, {Biancolini Castro} and Sayer, {Emma Jane}",
year = "2018",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1002/ece3.3945",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "3787--3796",
journal = "Ecology and Evolution",
issn = "2045-7758",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distinct responses of soil respiration to experimental litter manipulation in temperate woodland and tropical forest

AU - Brechet, Laetitia Magali

AU - Lopez-Sangil, Luis

AU - George, Charles

AU - Birkett, Alison Jane

AU - Baxendale, Catherine Louise

AU - Trujillo, Biancolini Castro

AU - Sayer, Emma Jane

PY - 2018/4

Y1 - 2018/4

N2 - Global change is affecting primary productivity in forests worldwide, and this, in turn, will alter long‐term carbon (C) sequestration in wooded ecosystems. On one hand, increased primary productivity, for example, in response to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2), can result in greater inputs of organic matter to the soil, which could increase C sequestration belowground. On other hand, many of the interactions between plants and microorganisms that determine soil C dynamics are poorly characterized, and additional inputs of plant material, such as leaf litter, can result in the mineralization of soil organic matter, and the release of soil C as CO2 during so‐called “priming effects”. Until now, very few studies made direct comparison of changes in soil C dynamics in response to altered plant inputs in different wooded ecosystems. We addressed this with a cross‐continental study with litter removal and addition treatments in a temperate woodland (Wytham Woods) and lowland tropical forest (Gigante forest) to compare the consequences of increased litterfall on soil respiration in two distinct wooded ecosystems. Mean soil respiration was almost twice as high at Gigante (5.0 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1) than at Wytham (2.7 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1) but surprisingly, litter manipulation treatments had a greater and more immediate effect on soil respiration at Wytham. We measured a 30% increase in soil respiration in response to litter addition treatments at Wytham, compared to a 10% increase at Gigante. Importantly, despite higher soil respiration rates at Gigante, priming effects were stronger and more consistent at Wytham. Our results suggest that in situ priming effects in wooded ecosystems track seasonality in litterfall and soil respiration but the amount of soil C released by priming is not proportional to rates of soil respiration. Instead, priming effects may be promoted by larger inputs of organic matter combined with slower turnover rates.

AB - Global change is affecting primary productivity in forests worldwide, and this, in turn, will alter long‐term carbon (C) sequestration in wooded ecosystems. On one hand, increased primary productivity, for example, in response to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2), can result in greater inputs of organic matter to the soil, which could increase C sequestration belowground. On other hand, many of the interactions between plants and microorganisms that determine soil C dynamics are poorly characterized, and additional inputs of plant material, such as leaf litter, can result in the mineralization of soil organic matter, and the release of soil C as CO2 during so‐called “priming effects”. Until now, very few studies made direct comparison of changes in soil C dynamics in response to altered plant inputs in different wooded ecosystems. We addressed this with a cross‐continental study with litter removal and addition treatments in a temperate woodland (Wytham Woods) and lowland tropical forest (Gigante forest) to compare the consequences of increased litterfall on soil respiration in two distinct wooded ecosystems. Mean soil respiration was almost twice as high at Gigante (5.0 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1) than at Wytham (2.7 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1) but surprisingly, litter manipulation treatments had a greater and more immediate effect on soil respiration at Wytham. We measured a 30% increase in soil respiration in response to litter addition treatments at Wytham, compared to a 10% increase at Gigante. Importantly, despite higher soil respiration rates at Gigante, priming effects were stronger and more consistent at Wytham. Our results suggest that in situ priming effects in wooded ecosystems track seasonality in litterfall and soil respiration but the amount of soil C released by priming is not proportional to rates of soil respiration. Instead, priming effects may be promoted by larger inputs of organic matter combined with slower turnover rates.

KW - fine root biomass

KW - forest ecosystems

KW - litter manipulation

KW - microbial biomass

KW - priming effects

KW - soil carbon dynamics

U2 - 10.1002/ece3.3945

DO - 10.1002/ece3.3945

M3 - Journal article

VL - 8

SP - 3787

EP - 3796

JO - Ecology and Evolution

JF - Ecology and Evolution

SN - 2045-7758

IS - 7

ER -