Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Distinctive or Professionalised?

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Distinctive or Professionalised?: Understanding the Postsecular in Faith-Based Responses to Trafficking, Forced Labour and Slavery in the UK

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Distinctive or Professionalised? Understanding the Postsecular in Faith-Based Responses to Trafficking, Forced Labour and Slavery in the UK. / Lonergan, Gwyneth; Lewis, Hannah; Tomalin, Emma et al.
In: Sociology, Vol. 55, No. 3, 01.06.2021, p. 505-521.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Lonergan G, Lewis H, Tomalin E, Waite L. Distinctive or Professionalised? Understanding the Postsecular in Faith-Based Responses to Trafficking, Forced Labour and Slavery in the UK. Sociology. 2021 Jun 1;55(3):505-521. Epub 2020 Dec 20. doi: 10.1177/0038038520967887

Author

Bibtex

@article{9a751039b83c4b849d52dfcd4a5817ad,
title = "Distinctive or Professionalised?: Understanding the Postsecular in Faith-Based Responses to Trafficking, Forced Labour and Slavery in the UK",
abstract = "This article examines the intersection of religious faith and the {\textquoteleft}fight against modern slavery{\textquoteright} in the UK, as yet unexplored in sociological literature. Analysis of faith based organisations{\textquoteright} (FBOs) activities in this area challenges understandings of a postsecular rapprochement between faith and secular actors - where postsecular is used by some scholars to refer to the re-emergence of faith in the public sphere, and where we understand rapprochement to mean the placing of equal value on faith-based and secular worldviews. Our research reveals that FBOs in the anti-trafficking/modern slavery third sector operate on a {\textquoteleft}dual register{\textquoteright}, secularising as they professionalise their public face, while retaining religious distinctiveness when engaging with co-religionists. We argue that, rather than evidence of a genuine two way postsecular rapprochement, it seems that FBOs in this sector are prioritising secular modalities, meaning the learning process is one-sided rather than complementary. ",
keywords = "Faith, Human Trafficking, Modern Slavery, Postsecular, Welfare Pluralism",
author = "Gwyneth Lonergan and Hannah Lewis and Emma Tomalin and Louise Waite",
year = "2021",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0038038520967887",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "505--521",
journal = "Sociology",
issn = "0038-0385",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distinctive or Professionalised?

T2 - Understanding the Postsecular in Faith-Based Responses to Trafficking, Forced Labour and Slavery in the UK

AU - Lonergan, Gwyneth

AU - Lewis, Hannah

AU - Tomalin, Emma

AU - Waite, Louise

PY - 2021/6/1

Y1 - 2021/6/1

N2 - This article examines the intersection of religious faith and the ‘fight against modern slavery’ in the UK, as yet unexplored in sociological literature. Analysis of faith based organisations’ (FBOs) activities in this area challenges understandings of a postsecular rapprochement between faith and secular actors - where postsecular is used by some scholars to refer to the re-emergence of faith in the public sphere, and where we understand rapprochement to mean the placing of equal value on faith-based and secular worldviews. Our research reveals that FBOs in the anti-trafficking/modern slavery third sector operate on a ‘dual register’, secularising as they professionalise their public face, while retaining religious distinctiveness when engaging with co-religionists. We argue that, rather than evidence of a genuine two way postsecular rapprochement, it seems that FBOs in this sector are prioritising secular modalities, meaning the learning process is one-sided rather than complementary.

AB - This article examines the intersection of religious faith and the ‘fight against modern slavery’ in the UK, as yet unexplored in sociological literature. Analysis of faith based organisations’ (FBOs) activities in this area challenges understandings of a postsecular rapprochement between faith and secular actors - where postsecular is used by some scholars to refer to the re-emergence of faith in the public sphere, and where we understand rapprochement to mean the placing of equal value on faith-based and secular worldviews. Our research reveals that FBOs in the anti-trafficking/modern slavery third sector operate on a ‘dual register’, secularising as they professionalise their public face, while retaining religious distinctiveness when engaging with co-religionists. We argue that, rather than evidence of a genuine two way postsecular rapprochement, it seems that FBOs in this sector are prioritising secular modalities, meaning the learning process is one-sided rather than complementary.

KW - Faith

KW - Human Trafficking

KW - Modern Slavery

KW - Postsecular

KW - Welfare Pluralism

U2 - 10.1177/0038038520967887

DO - 10.1177/0038038520967887

M3 - Journal article

VL - 55

SP - 505

EP - 521

JO - Sociology

JF - Sociology

SN - 0038-0385

IS - 3

ER -