Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Divergent perceptions of new marine protected a...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Divergent perceptions of new marine protected areas: comparing legal consciousness in Scilly and Barra, UK

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Divergent perceptions of new marine protected areas: comparing legal consciousness in Scilly and Barra, UK. / Pieraccini, Margherita; Cardwell, Emma Jayne.
In: Ocean and Coastal Management, Vol. 119, 01.2016, p. 21-29.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Pieraccini M, Cardwell EJ. Divergent perceptions of new marine protected areas: comparing legal consciousness in Scilly and Barra, UK. Ocean and Coastal Management. 2016 Jan;119:21-29. Epub 2015 Nov 22. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.09.016

Author

Pieraccini, Margherita ; Cardwell, Emma Jayne. / Divergent perceptions of new marine protected areas : comparing legal consciousness in Scilly and Barra, UK. In: Ocean and Coastal Management. 2016 ; Vol. 119. pp. 21-29.

Bibtex

@article{b52c232ddc8a4b8aa3971759695799f3,
title = "Divergent perceptions of new marine protected areas: comparing legal consciousness in Scilly and Barra, UK",
abstract = "The legal establishment of protected areas is often associated with a situation of conflict arising between conservation and other human activities in particular spaces. This is primarily due to the fact that protected areas law requires changes in the behaviour of resource users. Conservation conflicts arising from the establishment of protected areas are well documented in the social science literature and attempts are made to find ways to reduce such conflicts. Yet, what of cases in which the establishment of protected areas serves to officialise existing sustainable practices and may contain an element of future proofing? Do they still generate practices of resistance and conflict? These questions are answered in this paper comparing two case studies where the authors conducted primary qualitative research: the designation of new Marine Conservation Zones under the Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 in the Isles of Scilly (South West of England) and the designation of a new Special Area of Conservation under Council Directive 92/43/EEC (the Habitats Directive) in Barra (Scottish Outer Hebrides). Both protected areas are highly unlikely to impose changes in local sea-users{\textquoteright} behaviour, as in both cases they validate existing practices and are future proofing, in the sense that they offer tools that can be used to minimize the effects of potential future shocks and stresses, presently unknown. Yet, while in Scilly the new Marine Conservation Zones have been perceived as a positive addition to the seascape, in Barra the Special Area of Conservation has been heavily contested by the local community. The islanders' different perspectives towards protected areas law can be described as divergent {\textquoteleft}legal consciousness{\textquoteright}. {\textquoteleft}Legal consciousness{\textquoteright} is a socio-legal concept concerned with the ways in which the law is experienced, interpreted and re-shaped by ordinary people. In our case studies, legal consciousness is a dependent variable, being the product of three main causes: history, power relationships between regulators and regulatees and risk.",
keywords = "Marine protected areas, Legal consciousness, Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009, Habitats Directive",
author = "Margherita Pieraccini and Cardwell, {Emma Jayne}",
year = "2016",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.09.016",
language = "English",
volume = "119",
pages = "21--29",
journal = "Ocean and Coastal Management",
issn = "0964-5691",
publisher = "TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Divergent perceptions of new marine protected areas

T2 - comparing legal consciousness in Scilly and Barra, UK

AU - Pieraccini, Margherita

AU - Cardwell, Emma Jayne

PY - 2016/1

Y1 - 2016/1

N2 - The legal establishment of protected areas is often associated with a situation of conflict arising between conservation and other human activities in particular spaces. This is primarily due to the fact that protected areas law requires changes in the behaviour of resource users. Conservation conflicts arising from the establishment of protected areas are well documented in the social science literature and attempts are made to find ways to reduce such conflicts. Yet, what of cases in which the establishment of protected areas serves to officialise existing sustainable practices and may contain an element of future proofing? Do they still generate practices of resistance and conflict? These questions are answered in this paper comparing two case studies where the authors conducted primary qualitative research: the designation of new Marine Conservation Zones under the Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 in the Isles of Scilly (South West of England) and the designation of a new Special Area of Conservation under Council Directive 92/43/EEC (the Habitats Directive) in Barra (Scottish Outer Hebrides). Both protected areas are highly unlikely to impose changes in local sea-users’ behaviour, as in both cases they validate existing practices and are future proofing, in the sense that they offer tools that can be used to minimize the effects of potential future shocks and stresses, presently unknown. Yet, while in Scilly the new Marine Conservation Zones have been perceived as a positive addition to the seascape, in Barra the Special Area of Conservation has been heavily contested by the local community. The islanders' different perspectives towards protected areas law can be described as divergent ‘legal consciousness’. ‘Legal consciousness’ is a socio-legal concept concerned with the ways in which the law is experienced, interpreted and re-shaped by ordinary people. In our case studies, legal consciousness is a dependent variable, being the product of three main causes: history, power relationships between regulators and regulatees and risk.

AB - The legal establishment of protected areas is often associated with a situation of conflict arising between conservation and other human activities in particular spaces. This is primarily due to the fact that protected areas law requires changes in the behaviour of resource users. Conservation conflicts arising from the establishment of protected areas are well documented in the social science literature and attempts are made to find ways to reduce such conflicts. Yet, what of cases in which the establishment of protected areas serves to officialise existing sustainable practices and may contain an element of future proofing? Do they still generate practices of resistance and conflict? These questions are answered in this paper comparing two case studies where the authors conducted primary qualitative research: the designation of new Marine Conservation Zones under the Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 in the Isles of Scilly (South West of England) and the designation of a new Special Area of Conservation under Council Directive 92/43/EEC (the Habitats Directive) in Barra (Scottish Outer Hebrides). Both protected areas are highly unlikely to impose changes in local sea-users’ behaviour, as in both cases they validate existing practices and are future proofing, in the sense that they offer tools that can be used to minimize the effects of potential future shocks and stresses, presently unknown. Yet, while in Scilly the new Marine Conservation Zones have been perceived as a positive addition to the seascape, in Barra the Special Area of Conservation has been heavily contested by the local community. The islanders' different perspectives towards protected areas law can be described as divergent ‘legal consciousness’. ‘Legal consciousness’ is a socio-legal concept concerned with the ways in which the law is experienced, interpreted and re-shaped by ordinary people. In our case studies, legal consciousness is a dependent variable, being the product of three main causes: history, power relationships between regulators and regulatees and risk.

KW - Marine protected areas

KW - Legal consciousness

KW - Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009

KW - Habitats Directive

U2 - 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.09.016

DO - 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.09.016

M3 - Journal article

VL - 119

SP - 21

EP - 29

JO - Ocean and Coastal Management

JF - Ocean and Coastal Management

SN - 0964-5691

ER -