Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Diversity, choice and the quasi-market: An empi...
View graph of relations

Diversity, choice and the quasi-market: An empirical analysis of secondary education policy in England

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Diversity, choice and the quasi-market: An empirical analysis of secondary education policy in England. / Taylor, J; Bradley, S.
In: Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 72, No. 1, 2009, p. 1-26.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Taylor J, Bradley S. Diversity, choice and the quasi-market: An empirical analysis of secondary education policy in England. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 2009;72(1):1-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2009.00572.x

Author

Taylor, J ; Bradley, S. / Diversity, choice and the quasi-market: An empirical analysis of secondary education policy in England. In: Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 2009 ; Vol. 72, No. 1. pp. 1-26.

Bibtex

@article{afc588039b3440528bfd7b1438d1f791,
title = "Diversity, choice and the quasi-market: An empirical analysis of secondary education policy in England",
abstract = "This article investigates the extent to which exam performance at the end of compulsory education has been affected by three major education reforms: the introduction of a quasi-market following the Education Reform Act (1988); the specialist schools initiative introduced in 1994; and the Excellence in Cities programme introduced in 1999. Using a panel of schools for all state-funded secondary schools in England (1992–2006), we find that only about one-third of the improvement in school exam scores is directly attributable to the combined effect of these three major education reforms. The distributional consequences of the policy, however, are estimated to have been favourable, with the greatest gains being achieved by schools with the highest proportion of pupils from poor families.",
author = "J Taylor and S Bradley",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-0084.2009.00572.x",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "1--26",
journal = "Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics",
issn = "0305-9049",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diversity, choice and the quasi-market: An empirical analysis of secondary education policy in England

AU - Taylor, J

AU - Bradley, S

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - This article investigates the extent to which exam performance at the end of compulsory education has been affected by three major education reforms: the introduction of a quasi-market following the Education Reform Act (1988); the specialist schools initiative introduced in 1994; and the Excellence in Cities programme introduced in 1999. Using a panel of schools for all state-funded secondary schools in England (1992–2006), we find that only about one-third of the improvement in school exam scores is directly attributable to the combined effect of these three major education reforms. The distributional consequences of the policy, however, are estimated to have been favourable, with the greatest gains being achieved by schools with the highest proportion of pupils from poor families.

AB - This article investigates the extent to which exam performance at the end of compulsory education has been affected by three major education reforms: the introduction of a quasi-market following the Education Reform Act (1988); the specialist schools initiative introduced in 1994; and the Excellence in Cities programme introduced in 1999. Using a panel of schools for all state-funded secondary schools in England (1992–2006), we find that only about one-third of the improvement in school exam scores is directly attributable to the combined effect of these three major education reforms. The distributional consequences of the policy, however, are estimated to have been favourable, with the greatest gains being achieved by schools with the highest proportion of pupils from poor families.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2009.00572.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2009.00572.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 72

SP - 1

EP - 26

JO - Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics

JF - Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics

SN - 0305-9049

IS - 1

ER -