Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Do dominant firms provide more training?

Research

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • Do_Dominant_Firms_Train_Final

    Rights statement: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Bilanakos, C., Green, C. P., Heywood, J. S. and Theodoropoulos, N. (2017), Do Dominant Firms Provide More Training?. J Econ Manage Strat, 26: 67–95. doi:10.1111/jems.12177 which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jems.12177/abstract This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

    Accepted author manuscript, 373 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Do dominant firms provide more training?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Do dominant firms provide more training? / Bilanakos, Christos; Green, Colin Peter; Heywood, John Spencer et al.
In: Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2017, p. 67-95.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Bilanakos, C, Green, CP, Heywood, JS & Theodoropolous, N 2017, 'Do dominant firms provide more training?', Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 67-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12177

APA

Bilanakos, C., Green, C. P., Heywood, J. S., & Theodoropolous, N. (2017). Do dominant firms provide more training? Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 26(1), 67-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12177

Vancouver

Bilanakos C, Green CP, Heywood JS, Theodoropolous N. Do dominant firms provide more training? Journal of Economics and Management Strategy. 2017;26(1):67-95. Epub 2016 May 3. doi: 10.1111/jems.12177

Author

Bilanakos, Christos ; Green, Colin Peter ; Heywood, John Spencer et al. / Do dominant firms provide more training?. In: Journal of Economics and Management Strategy. 2017 ; Vol. 26, No. 1. pp. 67-95.

Bibtex

@article{41481e4664f247cd8af96bb7f9364555,
title = "Do dominant firms provide more training?",
abstract = "A canonical Cournot competition model shows that the profitability of training can increase as the number of competitors decreases. British establishment evidence from 1998, 2004, and 2011 confirms that firms in less competitive markets provide more formal training. This persists within three separate cross-sections and in two separate panel estimates. It persists with alternative measures of training, with alternative measures of market competition and in estimates designed to account for endogeneity. These results suggest that a dominant product market position, indeed, increases the incentives to invest in training.",
author = "Christos Bilanakos and Green, {Colin Peter} and Heywood, {John Spencer} and Nikos Theodoropolous",
note = "This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Bilanakos, C., Green, C. P., Heywood, J. S. and Theodoropoulos, N. (2017), Do Dominant Firms Provide More Training?. J Econ Manage Strat, 26: 67–95. doi:10.1111/jems.12177 which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jems.12177/abstract This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1111/jems.12177",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "67--95",
journal = "Journal of Economics and Management Strategy",
issn = "1058-6407",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do dominant firms provide more training?

AU - Bilanakos, Christos

AU - Green, Colin Peter

AU - Heywood, John Spencer

AU - Theodoropolous, Nikos

N1 - This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Bilanakos, C., Green, C. P., Heywood, J. S. and Theodoropoulos, N. (2017), Do Dominant Firms Provide More Training?. J Econ Manage Strat, 26: 67–95. doi:10.1111/jems.12177 which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jems.12177/abstract This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - A canonical Cournot competition model shows that the profitability of training can increase as the number of competitors decreases. British establishment evidence from 1998, 2004, and 2011 confirms that firms in less competitive markets provide more formal training. This persists within three separate cross-sections and in two separate panel estimates. It persists with alternative measures of training, with alternative measures of market competition and in estimates designed to account for endogeneity. These results suggest that a dominant product market position, indeed, increases the incentives to invest in training.

AB - A canonical Cournot competition model shows that the profitability of training can increase as the number of competitors decreases. British establishment evidence from 1998, 2004, and 2011 confirms that firms in less competitive markets provide more formal training. This persists within three separate cross-sections and in two separate panel estimates. It persists with alternative measures of training, with alternative measures of market competition and in estimates designed to account for endogeneity. These results suggest that a dominant product market position, indeed, increases the incentives to invest in training.

U2 - 10.1111/jems.12177

DO - 10.1111/jems.12177

M3 - Journal article

VL - 26

SP - 67

EP - 95

JO - Journal of Economics and Management Strategy

JF - Journal of Economics and Management Strategy

SN - 1058-6407

IS - 1

ER -