Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Do we need a Community Hydrological Model?

Research

Associated organisational unit

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Do we need a Community Hydrological Model?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Do we need a Community Hydrological Model? / Weiler, Markus; Beven, Keith John.
In: Water Resources Research, Vol. 51, No. 9, 12.09.2015, p. 7777-7784.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Weiler, M & Beven, KJ 2015, 'Do we need a Community Hydrological Model?', Water Resources Research, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 7777-7784. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016731

APA

Weiler, M., & Beven, K. J. (2015). Do we need a Community Hydrological Model? Water Resources Research, 51(9), 7777-7784. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016731

Vancouver

Weiler M, Beven KJ. Do we need a Community Hydrological Model? Water Resources Research. 2015 Sept 12;51(9):7777-7784. Epub 2015 Aug 18. doi: 10.1002/2014WR016731

Author

Weiler, Markus ; Beven, Keith John. / Do we need a Community Hydrological Model?. In: Water Resources Research. 2015 ; Vol. 51, No. 9. pp. 7777-7784.

Bibtex

@article{a604da099b0545b6ae2139f93c1eaef2,
title = "Do we need a Community Hydrological Model?",
abstract = "We believe that there are too many models in hydrology and we should ask ourselves the question, if we are currently wasting time and effort in developing another model again instead of focusing on the development of a Community Hydrological Model. In other fields, this kind of models has been quite successful, but due to several reasons, no single community model has been developed in the field of hydrology yet. The concept, strength, and weakness of a community model were discussed at the Chapman Conference on Catchment Spatial Behaviour and Complex Organisation held in Luxembourg in September 2014. This discussion as well as our own opinions about the potential of a community models or at least the necessary discussion to establish one are debated in this commentary.",
author = "Markus Weiler and Beven, {Keith John}",
year = "2015",
month = sep,
day = "12",
doi = "10.1002/2014WR016731",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "7777--7784",
journal = "Water Resources Research",
issn = "0043-1397",
publisher = "AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do we need a Community Hydrological Model?

AU - Weiler, Markus

AU - Beven, Keith John

PY - 2015/9/12

Y1 - 2015/9/12

N2 - We believe that there are too many models in hydrology and we should ask ourselves the question, if we are currently wasting time and effort in developing another model again instead of focusing on the development of a Community Hydrological Model. In other fields, this kind of models has been quite successful, but due to several reasons, no single community model has been developed in the field of hydrology yet. The concept, strength, and weakness of a community model were discussed at the Chapman Conference on Catchment Spatial Behaviour and Complex Organisation held in Luxembourg in September 2014. This discussion as well as our own opinions about the potential of a community models or at least the necessary discussion to establish one are debated in this commentary.

AB - We believe that there are too many models in hydrology and we should ask ourselves the question, if we are currently wasting time and effort in developing another model again instead of focusing on the development of a Community Hydrological Model. In other fields, this kind of models has been quite successful, but due to several reasons, no single community model has been developed in the field of hydrology yet. The concept, strength, and weakness of a community model were discussed at the Chapman Conference on Catchment Spatial Behaviour and Complex Organisation held in Luxembourg in September 2014. This discussion as well as our own opinions about the potential of a community models or at least the necessary discussion to establish one are debated in this commentary.

U2 - 10.1002/2014WR016731

DO - 10.1002/2014WR016731

M3 - Journal article

VL - 51

SP - 7777

EP - 7784

JO - Water Resources Research

JF - Water Resources Research

SN - 0043-1397

IS - 9

ER -