Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Does Danger Level Affect Bystander Intervention...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Does Danger Level Affect Bystander Intervention in Real-Life Conflicts?: Evidence From CCTV Footage

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Does Danger Level Affect Bystander Intervention in Real-Life Conflicts? Evidence From CCTV Footage. / Lindegaard, Marie R.; Liebst, Lasse S.; Philpot, Richard et al.

In: Social Psychological and Personality Science, Vol. 13, No. 4, 31.05.2022, p. 795-802.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Lindegaard, MR, Liebst, LS, Philpot, R, Levine, M & Bernasco, W 2022, 'Does Danger Level Affect Bystander Intervention in Real-Life Conflicts? Evidence From CCTV Footage', Social Psychological and Personality Science, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 795-802. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211042683

APA

Lindegaard, M. R., Liebst, L. S., Philpot, R., Levine, M., & Bernasco, W. (2022). Does Danger Level Affect Bystander Intervention in Real-Life Conflicts? Evidence From CCTV Footage. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(4), 795-802. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211042683

Vancouver

Lindegaard MR, Liebst LS, Philpot R, Levine M, Bernasco W. Does Danger Level Affect Bystander Intervention in Real-Life Conflicts? Evidence From CCTV Footage. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2022 May 31;13(4):795-802. Epub 2021 Sep 9. doi: 10.1177/19485506211042683

Author

Lindegaard, Marie R. ; Liebst, Lasse S. ; Philpot, Richard et al. / Does Danger Level Affect Bystander Intervention in Real-Life Conflicts? Evidence From CCTV Footage. In: Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2022 ; Vol. 13, No. 4. pp. 795-802.

Bibtex

@article{6fb00de5887448549636ccb2abff852d,
title = "Does Danger Level Affect Bystander Intervention in Real-Life Conflicts?: Evidence From CCTV Footage",
abstract = "In real-life violence, bystanders can take an active role in de-escalating conflict and helping others. Recent meta-analytical evidence of experimental studies suggests that elevated danger levels in conflicts facilitate bystander intervention. However, this finding may lack ecological validity because ethical concerns prohibit exposing participants to potentially harmful situations. Using an ecologically valid method, based on an analysis of 80 interpersonal conflicts unobtrusively recorded by public surveillance cameras, the present study confirms that danger is positively associated with bystander intervention. In the presence of danger, bystanders were 19 times more likely to intervene than in the absence of danger. It extends this knowledge by discovering that incremental changes in the severity level of the danger (low, medium, and high), however, were not associated with bystander intervention. These findings confirm the importance of further investigating the role of danger for bystander intervention, in larger samples, and involving multiple types of real-life emergencies.",
keywords = "helping behavior, bystander intervention, violence, aggression, emergency, danger, systematic video observation",
author = "Lindegaard, {Marie R.} and Liebst, {Lasse S.} and Richard Philpot and Mark Levine and Wim Bernasco",
year = "2022",
month = may,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1177/19485506211042683",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "795--802",
journal = "Social Psychological and Personality Science",
issn = "1948-5506",
publisher = "Sage Periodicals Press",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does Danger Level Affect Bystander Intervention in Real-Life Conflicts?

T2 - Evidence From CCTV Footage

AU - Lindegaard, Marie R.

AU - Liebst, Lasse S.

AU - Philpot, Richard

AU - Levine, Mark

AU - Bernasco, Wim

PY - 2022/5/31

Y1 - 2022/5/31

N2 - In real-life violence, bystanders can take an active role in de-escalating conflict and helping others. Recent meta-analytical evidence of experimental studies suggests that elevated danger levels in conflicts facilitate bystander intervention. However, this finding may lack ecological validity because ethical concerns prohibit exposing participants to potentially harmful situations. Using an ecologically valid method, based on an analysis of 80 interpersonal conflicts unobtrusively recorded by public surveillance cameras, the present study confirms that danger is positively associated with bystander intervention. In the presence of danger, bystanders were 19 times more likely to intervene than in the absence of danger. It extends this knowledge by discovering that incremental changes in the severity level of the danger (low, medium, and high), however, were not associated with bystander intervention. These findings confirm the importance of further investigating the role of danger for bystander intervention, in larger samples, and involving multiple types of real-life emergencies.

AB - In real-life violence, bystanders can take an active role in de-escalating conflict and helping others. Recent meta-analytical evidence of experimental studies suggests that elevated danger levels in conflicts facilitate bystander intervention. However, this finding may lack ecological validity because ethical concerns prohibit exposing participants to potentially harmful situations. Using an ecologically valid method, based on an analysis of 80 interpersonal conflicts unobtrusively recorded by public surveillance cameras, the present study confirms that danger is positively associated with bystander intervention. In the presence of danger, bystanders were 19 times more likely to intervene than in the absence of danger. It extends this knowledge by discovering that incremental changes in the severity level of the danger (low, medium, and high), however, were not associated with bystander intervention. These findings confirm the importance of further investigating the role of danger for bystander intervention, in larger samples, and involving multiple types of real-life emergencies.

KW - helping behavior

KW - bystander intervention

KW - violence

KW - aggression

KW - emergency

KW - danger

KW - systematic video observation

U2 - 10.1177/19485506211042683

DO - 10.1177/19485506211042683

M3 - Journal article

VL - 13

SP - 795

EP - 802

JO - Social Psychological and Personality Science

JF - Social Psychological and Personality Science

SN - 1948-5506

IS - 4

ER -