Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Does market size matter?

Electronic data

View graph of relations

Does market size matter?: a dynamic model of oligopolistic market structure, featuring costs of creating and maintaining a market position

Research output: Working paper

Published

Standard

Does market size matter? a dynamic model of oligopolistic market structure, featuring costs of creating and maintaining a market position. / Bloch, Harry; Eaton, Curtis; Rothschild, Robert.
Lancaster: Lancaster University, Department of Economics, 2013. (Economics Working Paper Series; Vol. 2013, No. 10).

Research output: Working paper

Harvard

Bloch, H, Eaton, C & Rothschild, R 2013 'Does market size matter? a dynamic model of oligopolistic market structure, featuring costs of creating and maintaining a market position' Economics Working Paper Series, no. 10, vol. 2013, Lancaster University, Department of Economics, Lancaster.

APA

Bloch, H., Eaton, C., & Rothschild, R. (2013). Does market size matter? a dynamic model of oligopolistic market structure, featuring costs of creating and maintaining a market position. (Economics Working Paper Series; Vol. 2013, No. 10). Lancaster University, Department of Economics.

Vancouver

Bloch H, Eaton C, Rothschild R. Does market size matter? a dynamic model of oligopolistic market structure, featuring costs of creating and maintaining a market position. Lancaster: Lancaster University, Department of Economics. 2013. (Economics Working Paper Series; 10).

Author

Bloch, Harry ; Eaton, Curtis ; Rothschild, Robert. / Does market size matter? a dynamic model of oligopolistic market structure, featuring costs of creating and maintaining a market position. Lancaster : Lancaster University, Department of Economics, 2013. (Economics Working Paper Series; 10).

Bibtex

@techreport{eec6add4483f445cb2501dc870462d61,
title = "Does market size matter?: a dynamic model of oligopolistic market structure, featuring costs of creating and maintaining a market position",
abstract = "In their efforts to create a position in a market, and to maintain that position, firms make positioning investments of various sorts, in R&D, plant, advertising, and location, or more generally, in product development and maintenance. The heart of this paper is the hypothesis that the success of these positioning investments is not assured. In an environment where the success of positioning investments is stochastic, the positioning game played by firms that compete to serve a market is necessarily dynamic. We model the positioning and operating decisions of firms in an environment of this sort. When the market is large enough to support at least one active firm, the expected number of firms serving the market at a point in time is a nearly continuous function of market size, in sharp contrast to the familiar integer valued step function seen in classic models of market structure. As a result, equilibrium expected total surplus and expected consumer surplus are higher than standard non-stochastic models would suggest, especially in circumstances where the expected number of firms is small. This suggests that classic models of market structure are not always a sound guide for policy.",
author = "Harry Bloch and Curtis Eaton and Robert Rothschild",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
series = "Economics Working Paper Series",
publisher = "Lancaster University, Department of Economics",
number = "10",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Lancaster University, Department of Economics",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Does market size matter?

T2 - a dynamic model of oligopolistic market structure, featuring costs of creating and maintaining a market position

AU - Bloch, Harry

AU - Eaton, Curtis

AU - Rothschild, Robert

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - In their efforts to create a position in a market, and to maintain that position, firms make positioning investments of various sorts, in R&D, plant, advertising, and location, or more generally, in product development and maintenance. The heart of this paper is the hypothesis that the success of these positioning investments is not assured. In an environment where the success of positioning investments is stochastic, the positioning game played by firms that compete to serve a market is necessarily dynamic. We model the positioning and operating decisions of firms in an environment of this sort. When the market is large enough to support at least one active firm, the expected number of firms serving the market at a point in time is a nearly continuous function of market size, in sharp contrast to the familiar integer valued step function seen in classic models of market structure. As a result, equilibrium expected total surplus and expected consumer surplus are higher than standard non-stochastic models would suggest, especially in circumstances where the expected number of firms is small. This suggests that classic models of market structure are not always a sound guide for policy.

AB - In their efforts to create a position in a market, and to maintain that position, firms make positioning investments of various sorts, in R&D, plant, advertising, and location, or more generally, in product development and maintenance. The heart of this paper is the hypothesis that the success of these positioning investments is not assured. In an environment where the success of positioning investments is stochastic, the positioning game played by firms that compete to serve a market is necessarily dynamic. We model the positioning and operating decisions of firms in an environment of this sort. When the market is large enough to support at least one active firm, the expected number of firms serving the market at a point in time is a nearly continuous function of market size, in sharp contrast to the familiar integer valued step function seen in classic models of market structure. As a result, equilibrium expected total surplus and expected consumer surplus are higher than standard non-stochastic models would suggest, especially in circumstances where the expected number of firms is small. This suggests that classic models of market structure are not always a sound guide for policy.

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Economics Working Paper Series

BT - Does market size matter?

PB - Lancaster University, Department of Economics

CY - Lancaster

ER -