Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Does Reduction-Induced Isomerization of a Urani...

Electronic data

  • C-H Activation manuscript draft 6

    Accepted author manuscript, 874 KB, Word document

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Does Reduction-Induced Isomerization of a Uranium(III) Aryl Complex Proceed via C–H Oxidative Addition and Reductive Elimination across the Uranium(II/IV) Redox Couple?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
  • Michael A. Boreen
  • Christopher Z. Ye
  • Andrew Kerridge
  • Karl N. McCabe
  • Brighton A. Skeel
  • Laurent Maron
  • John Arnold
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>13/06/2022
<mark>Journal</mark>Inorganic Chemistry
Issue number23
Volume61
Number of pages11
Pages (from-to)8955-8965
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date2/06/22
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Reaction of the uranium(III) bis(amidinate) aryl complex {TerphC(NiPr)2}2U(Terph) (2, where Terph = 4,4″-di-tert-butyl-m-terphenyl-2′-yl) with a strong reductant enabled isolation of isomeric uranium(III) bis(amidinate) aryl product {TerphC(NiPr)2}2U(Terph*) (3, where Terph* = 4,4″-di-tert-butyl-m-terphenyl-4′-yl). In terms of connectivity, 3 differs from 2 only in the positions of the U–C and C–H bonds on the central aryl ring of the m-terphenyl-based ligand. A deuterium labeling study ruled out mechanisms for this isomerization involving intermolecular abstraction or deprotonation of the ligand C–H bonds activated during the reaction. Due to the complexity of this rapid, heterogeneous reaction, experimental studies could not further distinguish between two different intramolecular C–H activation mechanisms. However, high-level computational studies were consistent with a mechanism that included two sets of unimolecular, mononuclear C–H oxidative addition and reductive elimination steps involving uranium(II/IV).