Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Does System Justification Promote Establishment...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Does System Justification Promote Establishment Voting? Mainstream Politics in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Does System Justification Promote Establishment Voting? Mainstream Politics in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. / Langer, Melanie; Vasilopoulos, Pavlos; Jost, John T.
In: Political Psychology, Vol. 44, No. 3, 30.06.2023, p. 551-581.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Langer M, Vasilopoulos P, Jost JT. Does System Justification Promote Establishment Voting? Mainstream Politics in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Political Psychology. 2023 Jun 30;44(3):551-581. Epub 2022 Sept 30. doi: 10.1111/pops.12860

Author

Langer, Melanie ; Vasilopoulos, Pavlos ; Jost, John T. / Does System Justification Promote Establishment Voting? Mainstream Politics in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. In: Political Psychology. 2023 ; Vol. 44, No. 3. pp. 551-581.

Bibtex

@article{41e56a109c8a4e94b73041a07f73cc2b,
title = "Does System Justification Promote Establishment Voting? Mainstream Politics in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom",
abstract = "Throughout Europe and North America, mainstream political parties have ceded electoral support to antiestablishment parties from the far left and far right. We investigate the hypothesis that individual differences in system justification—the psychological tendency to defend and justify the overarching social system—would be negatively associated with antiestablishment voting, even among citizens who would otherwise be inclined to support radicalism. In three large, nationally representative surveys conducted in France (N = 14,432), Germany (N = 1,168), and the United Kingdom (N = 2,337), we observed that system justification was positively associated with voting for establishment parties and negatively associated with antiestablishment voting. System justification was associated with reduced support for antiestablishment parties on the right and left—even among respondents who were high on ethnic intolerance, opposition to the European Union, economic distress, and support for income redistribution. Thus, all other things being equal, system‐justification tendencies reinforce political moderation, establishment voting, and therefore social stability.",
keywords = "Original Article, Original Articles, ideology and public opinion, system justification, voter dissatisfaction, antiestablishment parties, mainstream politics",
author = "Melanie Langer and Pavlos Vasilopoulos and Jost, {John T.}",
year = "2023",
month = jun,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1111/pops.12860",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "551--581",
journal = "Political Psychology",
issn = "0162-895X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does System Justification Promote Establishment Voting? Mainstream Politics in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom

AU - Langer, Melanie

AU - Vasilopoulos, Pavlos

AU - Jost, John T.

PY - 2023/6/30

Y1 - 2023/6/30

N2 - Throughout Europe and North America, mainstream political parties have ceded electoral support to antiestablishment parties from the far left and far right. We investigate the hypothesis that individual differences in system justification—the psychological tendency to defend and justify the overarching social system—would be negatively associated with antiestablishment voting, even among citizens who would otherwise be inclined to support radicalism. In three large, nationally representative surveys conducted in France (N = 14,432), Germany (N = 1,168), and the United Kingdom (N = 2,337), we observed that system justification was positively associated with voting for establishment parties and negatively associated with antiestablishment voting. System justification was associated with reduced support for antiestablishment parties on the right and left—even among respondents who were high on ethnic intolerance, opposition to the European Union, economic distress, and support for income redistribution. Thus, all other things being equal, system‐justification tendencies reinforce political moderation, establishment voting, and therefore social stability.

AB - Throughout Europe and North America, mainstream political parties have ceded electoral support to antiestablishment parties from the far left and far right. We investigate the hypothesis that individual differences in system justification—the psychological tendency to defend and justify the overarching social system—would be negatively associated with antiestablishment voting, even among citizens who would otherwise be inclined to support radicalism. In three large, nationally representative surveys conducted in France (N = 14,432), Germany (N = 1,168), and the United Kingdom (N = 2,337), we observed that system justification was positively associated with voting for establishment parties and negatively associated with antiestablishment voting. System justification was associated with reduced support for antiestablishment parties on the right and left—even among respondents who were high on ethnic intolerance, opposition to the European Union, economic distress, and support for income redistribution. Thus, all other things being equal, system‐justification tendencies reinforce political moderation, establishment voting, and therefore social stability.

KW - Original Article

KW - Original Articles

KW - ideology and public opinion

KW - system justification

KW - voter dissatisfaction

KW - antiestablishment parties

KW - mainstream politics

U2 - 10.1111/pops.12860

DO - 10.1111/pops.12860

M3 - Journal article

VL - 44

SP - 551

EP - 581

JO - Political Psychology

JF - Political Psychology

SN - 0162-895X

IS - 3

ER -