Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Doing/Undoing Stigma

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Doing/Undoing Stigma: The Moral Enterprise of Territorial Stigma

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Doing/Undoing Stigma: The Moral Enterprise of Territorial Stigma. / Müller, Thaddeus.
In: Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, Vol. 53, No. 2, 30.04.2024, p. 212-247.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Müller, T 2024, 'Doing/Undoing Stigma: The Moral Enterprise of Territorial Stigma', Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 212-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912416241229690

APA

Vancouver

Müller T. Doing/Undoing Stigma: The Moral Enterprise of Territorial Stigma. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 2024 Apr 30;53(2):212-247. Epub 2024 Feb 8. doi: 10.1177/08912416241229690

Author

Müller, Thaddeus. / Doing/Undoing Stigma : The Moral Enterprise of Territorial Stigma. In: Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 2024 ; Vol. 53, No. 2. pp. 212-247.

Bibtex

@article{81e846908cf64226a763857fdaaf563b,
title = "Doing/Undoing Stigma: The Moral Enterprise of Territorial Stigma",
abstract = "In this article I focus on stigma, and more specifically on territorial stigma in a Dutch suburb built in the 1970s. This publication is based on ethnographic fieldwork that lasted two and half years and which took place at the end of the 1980s. The data is reanalyzed in the light of recent developments in studies on stigma and territorial stigma, specifically how this is countered. I will use the conceptual pair—doing stigma and undoing stigma—to unpack stigma as a complex and dynamic process in which a diverse range of actors, such as inhabitants, civil servants and youth, are involved. The aim of this article is twofold: to describe and analyze the social construction of territorial stigma (doing stigma) of the neighborhood over a period of ten years and whether and how this stigma is countered (undoing stigma). This article highlights the agency of those targeted by stigma by paying attention to local narratives and using a multi-perspective ethnographic lens. The narratives show that stigma did not gain a master status because (1) the stigma producers were marginal in the social world of the targeted inhabitants and (2) it did not align with structural stigma (as in e.g., housing, health care, income, and education).",
keywords = "Urban Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Language and Linguistics",
author = "Thaddeus M{\"u}ller",
year = "2024",
month = apr,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1177/08912416241229690",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "212--247",
journal = "Journal of Contemporary Ethnography",
issn = "0891-2416",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Doing/Undoing Stigma

T2 - The Moral Enterprise of Territorial Stigma

AU - Müller, Thaddeus

PY - 2024/4/30

Y1 - 2024/4/30

N2 - In this article I focus on stigma, and more specifically on territorial stigma in a Dutch suburb built in the 1970s. This publication is based on ethnographic fieldwork that lasted two and half years and which took place at the end of the 1980s. The data is reanalyzed in the light of recent developments in studies on stigma and territorial stigma, specifically how this is countered. I will use the conceptual pair—doing stigma and undoing stigma—to unpack stigma as a complex and dynamic process in which a diverse range of actors, such as inhabitants, civil servants and youth, are involved. The aim of this article is twofold: to describe and analyze the social construction of territorial stigma (doing stigma) of the neighborhood over a period of ten years and whether and how this stigma is countered (undoing stigma). This article highlights the agency of those targeted by stigma by paying attention to local narratives and using a multi-perspective ethnographic lens. The narratives show that stigma did not gain a master status because (1) the stigma producers were marginal in the social world of the targeted inhabitants and (2) it did not align with structural stigma (as in e.g., housing, health care, income, and education).

AB - In this article I focus on stigma, and more specifically on territorial stigma in a Dutch suburb built in the 1970s. This publication is based on ethnographic fieldwork that lasted two and half years and which took place at the end of the 1980s. The data is reanalyzed in the light of recent developments in studies on stigma and territorial stigma, specifically how this is countered. I will use the conceptual pair—doing stigma and undoing stigma—to unpack stigma as a complex and dynamic process in which a diverse range of actors, such as inhabitants, civil servants and youth, are involved. The aim of this article is twofold: to describe and analyze the social construction of territorial stigma (doing stigma) of the neighborhood over a period of ten years and whether and how this stigma is countered (undoing stigma). This article highlights the agency of those targeted by stigma by paying attention to local narratives and using a multi-perspective ethnographic lens. The narratives show that stigma did not gain a master status because (1) the stigma producers were marginal in the social world of the targeted inhabitants and (2) it did not align with structural stigma (as in e.g., housing, health care, income, and education).

KW - Urban Studies

KW - Sociology and Political Science

KW - Anthropology

KW - Language and Linguistics

U2 - 10.1177/08912416241229690

DO - 10.1177/08912416241229690

M3 - Journal article

VL - 53

SP - 212

EP - 247

JO - Journal of Contemporary Ethnography

JF - Journal of Contemporary Ethnography

SN - 0891-2416

IS - 2

ER -