Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Dragonflies: climate canaries for river management

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Dragonflies: climate canaries for river management

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Dragonflies: climate canaries for river management. / Bush, A.; Theischinger, G.; Nipperess, D. et al.
In: Diversity and Distributions, Vol. 19, No. 1, 09.2012, p. 86-97.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Bush, A, Theischinger, G, Nipperess, D, Turak, E & Hughes, L 2012, 'Dragonflies: climate canaries for river management', Diversity and Distributions, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 86-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12007

APA

Bush, A., Theischinger, G., Nipperess, D., Turak, E., & Hughes, L. (2012). Dragonflies: climate canaries for river management. Diversity and Distributions, 19(1), 86-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12007

Vancouver

Bush A, Theischinger G, Nipperess D, Turak E, Hughes L. Dragonflies: climate canaries for river management. Diversity and Distributions. 2012 Sept;19(1):86-97. doi: 10.1111/ddi.12007

Author

Bush, A. ; Theischinger, G. ; Nipperess, D. et al. / Dragonflies: climate canaries for river management. In: Diversity and Distributions. 2012 ; Vol. 19, No. 1. pp. 86-97.

Bibtex

@article{33197b88e4f346e2b0f1d431121c41ec,
title = "Dragonflies: climate canaries for river management",
abstract = "AimFreshwater ecosystems are highly vulnerable to the effects of climate change. Where long‐term datasets are available, shifts in species phenology, species distributions and community structure consistent with a climate change signal have already been observed. Identifying trends across the wider landscape, to guide management in response to this threat, is limited by the resolution of sampling. Standard biomonitoring of macroinvertebrates for water‐quality purposes is currently not well suited to the detection of climate change effects, and there are risks that substantial changes will occur before a management response can be made. This study investigated whether dragonflies, frequently recommended as general indicators of ecological health, are also suitable as indicators of climate change.LocationData were analysed from standard bio‐assessment monitoring at over 850 sites spanning a 9° latitudinal gradient in eastern Australia.MethodsUsing variation partitioning, we analysed the proportion of assemblage turnover in dragonflies and other macroinvertebrate assemblages that can be explained by climate and other environmental drivers. We also tested whether the utility of dragonflies as indicators improved at higher taxonomic resolution and whether the turnover of dragonfly assemblages was congruent with that of other groups.ResultsClimate explained three times as much variation in turnover of dragonfly species than dragonfly and other macroinvertebrate assemblages at family level. The dissimilarity of dragonflies and varying turnover in each macroinvertebrate assemblage meant surrogacy amongst groups were low.Main conclusionsOn the basis of the influence of climate on turnover of macroinvertebrate assemblages, dragonfly species distribution appears highly sensitive to climatic factors, making this taxon a potential useful indicator of climate change responses. However, the low surrogacy amongst assemblages also suggests that a shift in the focus of conservation management from specific taxa to the functional composition of assemblages across a diverse range of habitats is needed.",
author = "A. Bush and G. Theischinger and D. Nipperess and E. Turak and Lesley Hughes",
year = "2012",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1111/ddi.12007",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "86--97",
journal = "Diversity and Distributions",
issn = "1366-9516",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dragonflies: climate canaries for river management

AU - Bush, A.

AU - Theischinger, G.

AU - Nipperess, D.

AU - Turak, E.

AU - Hughes, Lesley

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - AimFreshwater ecosystems are highly vulnerable to the effects of climate change. Where long‐term datasets are available, shifts in species phenology, species distributions and community structure consistent with a climate change signal have already been observed. Identifying trends across the wider landscape, to guide management in response to this threat, is limited by the resolution of sampling. Standard biomonitoring of macroinvertebrates for water‐quality purposes is currently not well suited to the detection of climate change effects, and there are risks that substantial changes will occur before a management response can be made. This study investigated whether dragonflies, frequently recommended as general indicators of ecological health, are also suitable as indicators of climate change.LocationData were analysed from standard bio‐assessment monitoring at over 850 sites spanning a 9° latitudinal gradient in eastern Australia.MethodsUsing variation partitioning, we analysed the proportion of assemblage turnover in dragonflies and other macroinvertebrate assemblages that can be explained by climate and other environmental drivers. We also tested whether the utility of dragonflies as indicators improved at higher taxonomic resolution and whether the turnover of dragonfly assemblages was congruent with that of other groups.ResultsClimate explained three times as much variation in turnover of dragonfly species than dragonfly and other macroinvertebrate assemblages at family level. The dissimilarity of dragonflies and varying turnover in each macroinvertebrate assemblage meant surrogacy amongst groups were low.Main conclusionsOn the basis of the influence of climate on turnover of macroinvertebrate assemblages, dragonfly species distribution appears highly sensitive to climatic factors, making this taxon a potential useful indicator of climate change responses. However, the low surrogacy amongst assemblages also suggests that a shift in the focus of conservation management from specific taxa to the functional composition of assemblages across a diverse range of habitats is needed.

AB - AimFreshwater ecosystems are highly vulnerable to the effects of climate change. Where long‐term datasets are available, shifts in species phenology, species distributions and community structure consistent with a climate change signal have already been observed. Identifying trends across the wider landscape, to guide management in response to this threat, is limited by the resolution of sampling. Standard biomonitoring of macroinvertebrates for water‐quality purposes is currently not well suited to the detection of climate change effects, and there are risks that substantial changes will occur before a management response can be made. This study investigated whether dragonflies, frequently recommended as general indicators of ecological health, are also suitable as indicators of climate change.LocationData were analysed from standard bio‐assessment monitoring at over 850 sites spanning a 9° latitudinal gradient in eastern Australia.MethodsUsing variation partitioning, we analysed the proportion of assemblage turnover in dragonflies and other macroinvertebrate assemblages that can be explained by climate and other environmental drivers. We also tested whether the utility of dragonflies as indicators improved at higher taxonomic resolution and whether the turnover of dragonfly assemblages was congruent with that of other groups.ResultsClimate explained three times as much variation in turnover of dragonfly species than dragonfly and other macroinvertebrate assemblages at family level. The dissimilarity of dragonflies and varying turnover in each macroinvertebrate assemblage meant surrogacy amongst groups were low.Main conclusionsOn the basis of the influence of climate on turnover of macroinvertebrate assemblages, dragonfly species distribution appears highly sensitive to climatic factors, making this taxon a potential useful indicator of climate change responses. However, the low surrogacy amongst assemblages also suggests that a shift in the focus of conservation management from specific taxa to the functional composition of assemblages across a diverse range of habitats is needed.

U2 - 10.1111/ddi.12007

DO - 10.1111/ddi.12007

M3 - Journal article

VL - 19

SP - 86

EP - 97

JO - Diversity and Distributions

JF - Diversity and Distributions

SN - 1366-9516

IS - 1

ER -