Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Educating the design stance

Electronic data

  • S0140525X12001616a

    Rights statement: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=BBS The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36 (2), pp 141-142 2013, © 2013 Cambridge University Press.

    Final published version, 1.25 MB, PDF document

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Educating the design stance: issues of coherence and transgression

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Educating the design stance: issues of coherence and transgression. / Freeman, Norman H.; Allen, Melissa L.
In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 36, No. 2, 04.2013, p. 141-142.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Freeman, NH & Allen, ML 2013, 'Educating the design stance: issues of coherence and transgression', Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 141-142. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12001616

APA

Vancouver

Freeman NH, Allen ML. Educating the design stance: issues of coherence and transgression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2013 Apr;36(2):141-142. Epub 2013 Mar 18. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12001616

Author

Freeman, Norman H. ; Allen, Melissa L. / Educating the design stance : issues of coherence and transgression. In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2013 ; Vol. 36, No. 2. pp. 141-142.

Bibtex

@article{c75b01dc23234ec399969cc512083cfc,
title = "Educating the design stance: issues of coherence and transgression",
abstract = "Bullot & Reber (B&R) put forth a design stance to fuse psychological and art historical accounts of visual thinking into a single theory. We argue that this aspect of their proposal needs further fine-tuning. Issues of transgression and coherence are necessary to provide stability to the design stance. We advocate looking to Art Education for such fundamentals of picture understanding.",
author = "Freeman, {Norman H.} and Allen, {Melissa L}",
note = "http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=BBS The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36 (2), pp 141-142 2013, {\textcopyright} 2013 Cambridge University Press.",
year = "2013",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1017/S0140525X12001616",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "141--142",
journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",
issn = "0140-525X",
publisher = "CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Educating the design stance

T2 - issues of coherence and transgression

AU - Freeman, Norman H.

AU - Allen, Melissa L

N1 - http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=BBS The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36 (2), pp 141-142 2013, © 2013 Cambridge University Press.

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Bullot & Reber (B&R) put forth a design stance to fuse psychological and art historical accounts of visual thinking into a single theory. We argue that this aspect of their proposal needs further fine-tuning. Issues of transgression and coherence are necessary to provide stability to the design stance. We advocate looking to Art Education for such fundamentals of picture understanding.

AB - Bullot & Reber (B&R) put forth a design stance to fuse psychological and art historical accounts of visual thinking into a single theory. We argue that this aspect of their proposal needs further fine-tuning. Issues of transgression and coherence are necessary to provide stability to the design stance. We advocate looking to Art Education for such fundamentals of picture understanding.

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X12001616

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X12001616

M3 - Journal article

VL - 36

SP - 141

EP - 142

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

SN - 0140-525X

IS - 2

ER -