Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Effect of clay content and distribution on hydr...

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • Author copy of accepted manuscript

    Rights statement: © 2019 Society of Exploration Geophysicists Use of this article is subject to SEG terms of use and condition.

    Accepted author manuscript, 834 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Effect of clay content and distribution on hydraulic and geophysical properties of synthetic sand-clay mixtures

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Effect of clay content and distribution on hydraulic and geophysical properties of synthetic sand-clay mixtures. / Osterman, Gordon; Sugand, Madhuri; Keating, Kristina et al.
In: Geophysics, Vol. 84, No. 4, 24.05.2019, p. E239-E253.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Osterman G, Sugand M, Keating K, Binley A, Slater L. Effect of clay content and distribution on hydraulic and geophysical properties of synthetic sand-clay mixtures. Geophysics. 2019 May 24;84(4):E239-E253. doi: 10.1190/GEO2018-0387.1

Author

Osterman, Gordon ; Sugand, Madhuri ; Keating, Kristina et al. / Effect of clay content and distribution on hydraulic and geophysical properties of synthetic sand-clay mixtures. In: Geophysics. 2019 ; Vol. 84, No. 4. pp. E239-E253.

Bibtex

@article{8c772415bcaa4559835886f81ba92605,
title = "Effect of clay content and distribution on hydraulic and geophysical properties of synthetic sand-clay mixtures",
abstract = "Geophysical methods show promise for detecting the spatial variability of subsurface clay content and its effect on subsurface hydraulic properties. We have developed a laboratory study that examines the influence of clay content and distribution on the relationships between hydraulic conductivity K and the physical and geophysical properties of the media. Two geophysical methods are investigated: spectral induced polarization (SIP) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). We used synthetic sediment mixtures of sand and up to 10% kaolinite clay by mass; the clay was homogeneously mixed or was present as large (approximately 5 mm) clusters distributed through the sample. The K varies moderately well (normalized root-mean-square error [Nrms error] = 0.393) with the pore-volume normalized surface area S-por a proxy measure of clay content, in the homogeneous samples and poorly (Nrms error = 0.507) when the clustered samples are included in the fit. The SIP parameters indicate moderately good to excellent fits with S-por for homogeneous samples (Nrms error = 0.0783-0.139) and moderately good to good fits for clustered samples (Nrms error = 0.140-0.336), and the coefficients describing the polarizability of the samples depend on the clay distribution. NMR parameters vary moderately well with S-por in the homogeneous samples (Nrms error = 0.341-0.412) and poorly (Nrms error = 1.08-6.04) in the clustered samples. The SIP parameters vary moderately well with K (Nrms error = 0.301-0.466); however, the relationship between the SIP parameters and K is compromised by the nonnegligible polarization of the clay clusters. NMR parameters indicate good to excellent fits with K (Nrms error = 0.0789-0.116). For SIP and NMR, fitting homogeneous and clustered samples together does not compromise the fit quality. These results suggest that the geophysical measurements are better predictors of K in heterogeneous porous media than bulk measures of pore geometry such as S-por.",
keywords = "NUCLEAR-MAGNETIC-RESONANCE, SPECTRAL INDUCED POLARIZATION, COMPLEX CONDUCTIVITY, NMR RELAXATION, UNCONSOLIDATED SEDIMENTS, SURFACE RELAXIVITY, PERMEABILITY, PORE, WATER, AQUIFER",
author = "Gordon Osterman and Madhuri Sugand and Kristina Keating and Andrew Binley and Lee Slater",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2019 Society of Exploration Geophysicists Use of this article is subject to SEG terms of use and condition.",
year = "2019",
month = may,
day = "24",
doi = "10.1190/GEO2018-0387.1",
language = "English",
volume = "84",
pages = "E239--E253",
journal = "Geophysics",
issn = "0016-8033",
publisher = "Society Of Exploration Geophysicists",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of clay content and distribution on hydraulic and geophysical properties of synthetic sand-clay mixtures

AU - Osterman, Gordon

AU - Sugand, Madhuri

AU - Keating, Kristina

AU - Binley, Andrew

AU - Slater, Lee

N1 - © 2019 Society of Exploration Geophysicists Use of this article is subject to SEG terms of use and condition.

PY - 2019/5/24

Y1 - 2019/5/24

N2 - Geophysical methods show promise for detecting the spatial variability of subsurface clay content and its effect on subsurface hydraulic properties. We have developed a laboratory study that examines the influence of clay content and distribution on the relationships between hydraulic conductivity K and the physical and geophysical properties of the media. Two geophysical methods are investigated: spectral induced polarization (SIP) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). We used synthetic sediment mixtures of sand and up to 10% kaolinite clay by mass; the clay was homogeneously mixed or was present as large (approximately 5 mm) clusters distributed through the sample. The K varies moderately well (normalized root-mean-square error [Nrms error] = 0.393) with the pore-volume normalized surface area S-por a proxy measure of clay content, in the homogeneous samples and poorly (Nrms error = 0.507) when the clustered samples are included in the fit. The SIP parameters indicate moderately good to excellent fits with S-por for homogeneous samples (Nrms error = 0.0783-0.139) and moderately good to good fits for clustered samples (Nrms error = 0.140-0.336), and the coefficients describing the polarizability of the samples depend on the clay distribution. NMR parameters vary moderately well with S-por in the homogeneous samples (Nrms error = 0.341-0.412) and poorly (Nrms error = 1.08-6.04) in the clustered samples. The SIP parameters vary moderately well with K (Nrms error = 0.301-0.466); however, the relationship between the SIP parameters and K is compromised by the nonnegligible polarization of the clay clusters. NMR parameters indicate good to excellent fits with K (Nrms error = 0.0789-0.116). For SIP and NMR, fitting homogeneous and clustered samples together does not compromise the fit quality. These results suggest that the geophysical measurements are better predictors of K in heterogeneous porous media than bulk measures of pore geometry such as S-por.

AB - Geophysical methods show promise for detecting the spatial variability of subsurface clay content and its effect on subsurface hydraulic properties. We have developed a laboratory study that examines the influence of clay content and distribution on the relationships between hydraulic conductivity K and the physical and geophysical properties of the media. Two geophysical methods are investigated: spectral induced polarization (SIP) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). We used synthetic sediment mixtures of sand and up to 10% kaolinite clay by mass; the clay was homogeneously mixed or was present as large (approximately 5 mm) clusters distributed through the sample. The K varies moderately well (normalized root-mean-square error [Nrms error] = 0.393) with the pore-volume normalized surface area S-por a proxy measure of clay content, in the homogeneous samples and poorly (Nrms error = 0.507) when the clustered samples are included in the fit. The SIP parameters indicate moderately good to excellent fits with S-por for homogeneous samples (Nrms error = 0.0783-0.139) and moderately good to good fits for clustered samples (Nrms error = 0.140-0.336), and the coefficients describing the polarizability of the samples depend on the clay distribution. NMR parameters vary moderately well with S-por in the homogeneous samples (Nrms error = 0.341-0.412) and poorly (Nrms error = 1.08-6.04) in the clustered samples. The SIP parameters vary moderately well with K (Nrms error = 0.301-0.466); however, the relationship between the SIP parameters and K is compromised by the nonnegligible polarization of the clay clusters. NMR parameters indicate good to excellent fits with K (Nrms error = 0.0789-0.116). For SIP and NMR, fitting homogeneous and clustered samples together does not compromise the fit quality. These results suggest that the geophysical measurements are better predictors of K in heterogeneous porous media than bulk measures of pore geometry such as S-por.

KW - NUCLEAR-MAGNETIC-RESONANCE

KW - SPECTRAL INDUCED POLARIZATION

KW - COMPLEX CONDUCTIVITY

KW - NMR RELAXATION

KW - UNCONSOLIDATED SEDIMENTS

KW - SURFACE RELAXIVITY

KW - PERMEABILITY

KW - PORE

KW - WATER

KW - AQUIFER

U2 - 10.1190/GEO2018-0387.1

DO - 10.1190/GEO2018-0387.1

M3 - Journal article

VL - 84

SP - E239-E253

JO - Geophysics

JF - Geophysics

SN - 0016-8033

IS - 4

ER -