Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Effects of negation and knowledgeability on pra...

Links

View graph of relations

Effects of negation and knowledgeability on pragmatic inferences

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN Conference paperpeer-review

Published

Standard

Effects of negation and knowledgeability on pragmatic inferences. / Rees, Alice; Rohde, Hannah.
2022. 1553-1558 Paper presented at 44th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society: Cognitive Diversity, CogSci 2022, Toronto, Canada.

Research output: Contribution to conference - Without ISBN/ISSN Conference paperpeer-review

Harvard

Rees, A & Rohde, H 2022, 'Effects of negation and knowledgeability on pragmatic inferences', Paper presented at 44th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society: Cognitive Diversity, CogSci 2022, Toronto, Canada, 27/07/22 - 30/07/22 pp. 1553-1558. <https://escholarship.org/uc/item/81r7r2q0>

APA

Rees, A., & Rohde, H. (2022). Effects of negation and knowledgeability on pragmatic inferences. 1553-1558. Paper presented at 44th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society: Cognitive Diversity, CogSci 2022, Toronto, Canada. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/81r7r2q0

Vancouver

Rees A, Rohde H. Effects of negation and knowledgeability on pragmatic inferences. 2022. Paper presented at 44th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society: Cognitive Diversity, CogSci 2022, Toronto, Canada.

Author

Rees, Alice ; Rohde, Hannah. / Effects of negation and knowledgeability on pragmatic inferences. Paper presented at 44th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society: Cognitive Diversity, CogSci 2022, Toronto, Canada.6 p.

Bibtex

@conference{a1f6aa7a11de4510af3492fb7abd373e,
title = "Effects of negation and knowledgeability on pragmatic inferences",
abstract = "Language use can be characterised as transparent, stating facts about the world, or non-transparent, requiring additional meaning to be inferred. The challenge faced by addressees is recognizing when language use is transparent or not. The current study investigates two factors that may influence how readily participants interpret utterances as instances of transparent or non-transparent language use; speaker knowledgeability and utterance form. When utterances involved negation participants were more likely to recognize this as non-transparent language use and infer that the situation is usually different. Whereas speaker knowledge did not influence how utterances were understood.",
keywords = "inferences, negation, pragmatics",
author = "Alice Rees and Hannah Rohde",
year = "2022",
month = jul,
day = "22",
language = "English",
pages = "1553--1558",
note = "44th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society: Cognitive Diversity, CogSci 2022 ; Conference date: 27-07-2022 Through 30-07-2022",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - Effects of negation and knowledgeability on pragmatic inferences

AU - Rees, Alice

AU - Rohde, Hannah

PY - 2022/7/22

Y1 - 2022/7/22

N2 - Language use can be characterised as transparent, stating facts about the world, or non-transparent, requiring additional meaning to be inferred. The challenge faced by addressees is recognizing when language use is transparent or not. The current study investigates two factors that may influence how readily participants interpret utterances as instances of transparent or non-transparent language use; speaker knowledgeability and utterance form. When utterances involved negation participants were more likely to recognize this as non-transparent language use and infer that the situation is usually different. Whereas speaker knowledge did not influence how utterances were understood.

AB - Language use can be characterised as transparent, stating facts about the world, or non-transparent, requiring additional meaning to be inferred. The challenge faced by addressees is recognizing when language use is transparent or not. The current study investigates two factors that may influence how readily participants interpret utterances as instances of transparent or non-transparent language use; speaker knowledgeability and utterance form. When utterances involved negation participants were more likely to recognize this as non-transparent language use and infer that the situation is usually different. Whereas speaker knowledge did not influence how utterances were understood.

KW - inferences

KW - negation

KW - pragmatics

M3 - Conference paper

AN - SCOPUS:85146439980

SP - 1553

EP - 1558

T2 - 44th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society: Cognitive Diversity, CogSci 2022

Y2 - 27 July 2022 through 30 July 2022

ER -