Rights statement: This is a preprint, or manuscript version and that the article has been accepted for publication in The Review of Economics and Statistics
Accepted author manuscript, 6.97 MB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Final published version
Licence: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of Peers and Rank on Cognition, Preferences, and Personality
AU - Dasgupta, Utteeyo
AU - Mani, Subha
AU - Sharma, Smriti
AU - Singhal, Saurabh
N1 - This is a preprint, or manuscript version and that the article has been accepted for publication in The Review of Economics and Statistics
PY - 2022/5/31
Y1 - 2022/5/31
N2 - We exploit the variation in admission cutoffs across colleges at a leading Indian university to estimate the causal effects of enrolling in a selective college on cognitive attainment, economic preferences, and Big Five personality traits. Using a regression discontinuity design, we find that enrolling in a selective college improves university exam scores of the marginally admitted females, and makes them less overconfident and less risk averse, while males in selective colleges experience a decline in extraversion and conscientiousness. We find differences in peer quality and rank concerns to be driving our findings.
AB - We exploit the variation in admission cutoffs across colleges at a leading Indian university to estimate the causal effects of enrolling in a selective college on cognitive attainment, economic preferences, and Big Five personality traits. Using a regression discontinuity design, we find that enrolling in a selective college improves university exam scores of the marginally admitted females, and makes them less overconfident and less risk averse, while males in selective colleges experience a decline in extraversion and conscientiousness. We find differences in peer quality and rank concerns to be driving our findings.
U2 - 10.1162/rest_a_00966
DO - 10.1162/rest_a_00966
M3 - Journal article
VL - 104
SP - 587
EP - 601
JO - The Review of Economics and Statistics
JF - The Review of Economics and Statistics
SN - 0034-6535
IS - 3
ER -