Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Embedding deliberation: guiding the use of deli...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Embedding deliberation: guiding the use of deliberative mini-publics in climate policy-making

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Embedding deliberation: guiding the use of deliberative mini-publics in climate policy-making. / Ainscough, J.; Willis, R.
In: Climate Policy, Vol. 24, No. 6, 02.07.2024, p. 828-842.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Ainscough J, Willis R. Embedding deliberation: guiding the use of deliberative mini-publics in climate policy-making. Climate Policy. 2024 Jul 2;24(6):828-842. Epub 2024 Jan 16. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2024.2303337

Author

Bibtex

@article{ac7107d8207347509d9a85e59124b65f,
title = "Embedding deliberation: guiding the use of deliberative mini-publics in climate policy-making",
abstract = "The use of deliberative mini-publics (DMPs), such as citizens{\textquoteright} assemblies, is becoming more common in climate policy-making across many countries. The upsurge of these methods reflects an acknowledgement of the need to engage the publics in policy choices that significantly impact their lives. Many DMPs to date have focused on the general challenge of decarbonization, across a range of policy areas. In this article, we first situate DMPs within the wider field of public engagement methods. We then draw from deliberative democratic theory and practice to argue that the next step for climate DMPs is to focus them on specific climate policy challenges and to embed and routinize their use in existing policy-making institutions. We present a case study of the targeted use of a climate DMP, which we designed and ran in partnership with the UK Climate Change Committee, focused on home energy decarbonization. We use this case study to explore barriers and challenges to embedding such an approach in climate policy-making institutions. Finally, we suggest ways that such challenges can be overcome and identify a number of tensions that must be navigated as DMPs become embedded in climate policy-making.",
keywords = "Deliberative democracy, climate assemblies, deliberative mini-publics, public policy preferences",
author = "J. Ainscough and R. Willis",
year = "2024",
month = jul,
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/14693062.2024.2303337",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "828--842",
journal = "Climate Policy",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Embedding deliberation: guiding the use of deliberative mini-publics in climate policy-making

AU - Ainscough, J.

AU - Willis, R.

PY - 2024/7/2

Y1 - 2024/7/2

N2 - The use of deliberative mini-publics (DMPs), such as citizens’ assemblies, is becoming more common in climate policy-making across many countries. The upsurge of these methods reflects an acknowledgement of the need to engage the publics in policy choices that significantly impact their lives. Many DMPs to date have focused on the general challenge of decarbonization, across a range of policy areas. In this article, we first situate DMPs within the wider field of public engagement methods. We then draw from deliberative democratic theory and practice to argue that the next step for climate DMPs is to focus them on specific climate policy challenges and to embed and routinize their use in existing policy-making institutions. We present a case study of the targeted use of a climate DMP, which we designed and ran in partnership with the UK Climate Change Committee, focused on home energy decarbonization. We use this case study to explore barriers and challenges to embedding such an approach in climate policy-making institutions. Finally, we suggest ways that such challenges can be overcome and identify a number of tensions that must be navigated as DMPs become embedded in climate policy-making.

AB - The use of deliberative mini-publics (DMPs), such as citizens’ assemblies, is becoming more common in climate policy-making across many countries. The upsurge of these methods reflects an acknowledgement of the need to engage the publics in policy choices that significantly impact their lives. Many DMPs to date have focused on the general challenge of decarbonization, across a range of policy areas. In this article, we first situate DMPs within the wider field of public engagement methods. We then draw from deliberative democratic theory and practice to argue that the next step for climate DMPs is to focus them on specific climate policy challenges and to embed and routinize their use in existing policy-making institutions. We present a case study of the targeted use of a climate DMP, which we designed and ran in partnership with the UK Climate Change Committee, focused on home energy decarbonization. We use this case study to explore barriers and challenges to embedding such an approach in climate policy-making institutions. Finally, we suggest ways that such challenges can be overcome and identify a number of tensions that must be navigated as DMPs become embedded in climate policy-making.

KW - Deliberative democracy

KW - climate assemblies

KW - deliberative mini-publics

KW - public policy preferences

U2 - 10.1080/14693062.2024.2303337

DO - 10.1080/14693062.2024.2303337

M3 - Journal article

VL - 24

SP - 828

EP - 842

JO - Climate Policy

JF - Climate Policy

IS - 6

ER -