Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Disability and Society on 09/10/2015, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09687599.2015.1091151
Accepted author manuscript, 55.7 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Employment and support allowance, the ‘summer budget’ and less eligible disabled people
AU - Grover, Chris
N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Disability and Society on 09/10/2015, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09687599.2015.1091151
PY - 2015/12
Y1 - 2015/12
N2 - In the first UK budget by a Conservative Government for 18 years, £13 billionper annum savings in social security spending by 2020/21 were announced. Ofthese, 4.9% (£640 million per annum, and up to £900 million in the years after2020) is to come from the withdrawal from April 2017 of the work-relatedcomponent of the Employment and Support Allowance. This means that newclaimants will be worse off by £29.05 per week (2015/16 figures) than wouldhave been the case had the measure not been introduced. This brief commentarycritically analyses this development as the extension of an ideological assaultupon the out-of-work benefits for disabled people which has been gatheringmomentum for about a decade in the hope of forcing such people into competingfor wage work in the open market.
AB - In the first UK budget by a Conservative Government for 18 years, £13 billionper annum savings in social security spending by 2020/21 were announced. Ofthese, 4.9% (£640 million per annum, and up to £900 million in the years after2020) is to come from the withdrawal from April 2017 of the work-relatedcomponent of the Employment and Support Allowance. This means that newclaimants will be worse off by £29.05 per week (2015/16 figures) than wouldhave been the case had the measure not been introduced. This brief commentarycritically analyses this development as the extension of an ideological assaultupon the out-of-work benefits for disabled people which has been gatheringmomentum for about a decade in the hope of forcing such people into competingfor wage work in the open market.
KW - benefits
KW - disabled people
KW - benefits; disabled people; Employment and Support Allowance
KW - less eligibility
U2 - 10.1080/09687599.2015.1091151
DO - 10.1080/09687599.2015.1091151
M3 - Journal article
VL - 30
SP - 1573
EP - 1576
JO - Disability and Society
JF - Disability and Society
SN - 0968-7599
IS - 10
ER -