Final published version
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Energy Return on Energy Invested (ERoEI) for photovoltaic solar systems in regions of moderate insolation
T2 - a comprehensive response
AU - Raugei, Marco
AU - Sgouridis, Sgouris
AU - Murphy, David
AU - Fthenakis, Vasilis
AU - Frischknecht, Rolf
AU - Breyer, Christian
AU - Bardi, Ugo
AU - Barnhart, Charles
AU - Buckley, Alastair
AU - Carbajales-Dale, Michael
AU - Csala, Denes
AU - de Wild-Scholten, Mariska
AU - Heath, Garvin
AU - Jæger-Waldau, Arnulf
AU - Jones, Christopher
AU - Keller, Arthur
AU - Leccisi, Enrica
AU - Mancarella, Pierluigi
AU - Pearsall, Nicola
AU - Siegel, Adam
AU - Sinke, Wim
AU - Stolz, Philippe
PY - 2017/3
Y1 - 2017/3
N2 - A recent paper by Ferroni and Hopkirk (2016) asserts that the ERoEI (also referred to as EROI) of photovoltaic (PV) systems is so low that they actually act as net energy sinks, rather than delivering energy to society. Such claim, if accurate, would call into question many energy investment decisions. In the same paper, a comparison is also drawn between PV and nuclear electricity. We have carefully analysed this paper, and found methodological inconsistencies and calculation errors that, in combination, render its conclusions not scientifically sound. Ferroni and Hopkirk adopt ‘extended’ boundaries for their analysis of PV without acknowledging that such choice of boundaries makes their results incompatible with those for all other technologies that have been analysed using more conventional boundaries, including nuclear energy with which the authors engage in multiple inconsistent comparisons. In addition, they use out-dated information, make invalid assumptions on PV specifications and other key parameters, and conduct calculation errors, including double counting. We herein provide revised EROI calculations for PV electricity in Switzerland, adopting both conventional and ‘extended’ system boundaries, to contrast with their results, which points to an order-of-magnitude underestimate of the EROI of PV in Switzerland by Ferroni and Hopkirk.
AB - A recent paper by Ferroni and Hopkirk (2016) asserts that the ERoEI (also referred to as EROI) of photovoltaic (PV) systems is so low that they actually act as net energy sinks, rather than delivering energy to society. Such claim, if accurate, would call into question many energy investment decisions. In the same paper, a comparison is also drawn between PV and nuclear electricity. We have carefully analysed this paper, and found methodological inconsistencies and calculation errors that, in combination, render its conclusions not scientifically sound. Ferroni and Hopkirk adopt ‘extended’ boundaries for their analysis of PV without acknowledging that such choice of boundaries makes their results incompatible with those for all other technologies that have been analysed using more conventional boundaries, including nuclear energy with which the authors engage in multiple inconsistent comparisons. In addition, they use out-dated information, make invalid assumptions on PV specifications and other key parameters, and conduct calculation errors, including double counting. We herein provide revised EROI calculations for PV electricity in Switzerland, adopting both conventional and ‘extended’ system boundaries, to contrast with their results, which points to an order-of-magnitude underestimate of the EROI of PV in Switzerland by Ferroni and Hopkirk.
KW - EROI
KW - ERoEI
KW - Photovoltaic energy
KW - Insolation levels
KW - Switzerland
KW - Germany
KW - Incentive system
KW - Adjustment factor
U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.042
DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.042
M3 - Journal article
VL - 102
SP - 377
EP - 384
JO - Energy Policy
JF - Energy Policy
SN - 0301-4215
ER -