Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > English Responses to Shariah Tribunals

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

English Responses to Shariah Tribunals: A Critical Assessment of Populist Attitudes towards Islamic Law

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

English Responses to Shariah Tribunals: A Critical Assessment of Populist Attitudes towards Islamic Law. / Al-Astewani, Amin.
In: Critical Policy Studies, 18.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Al-Astewani A. English Responses to Shariah Tribunals: A Critical Assessment of Populist Attitudes towards Islamic Law. Critical Policy Studies. 2019 Jan 18. Epub 2019 Jan 18. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2018.1564061

Author

Bibtex

@article{f9c8a268c4aa45658f673920b00b5b5a,
title = "English Responses to Shariah Tribunals: A Critical Assessment of Populist Attitudes towards Islamic Law",
abstract = "Whilst the literature on populism spans almost every conceivable discipline, the study of its relationship with religion remains exceptionally sparse. This paper seeks to fill an important gap in the literature and significantly enrich the study of populism by directly addressing the way in which religion impacts upon and is connected with populist movements. It does so by addressing a particularly illuminating case-study of populist attitudes toward Islamic law in Europe, namely the English public{\textquoteright}s response toward the formation of Shariah tribunals. As this paper shall show, the populist depiction of Shariah tribunals forced the UK government to dramatically alter its stance toward such tribunals, by framing the formation of Shariah tribunals as a malign and subversive attempt by a religious fundamentalist lobby at annexing the jurisdiction of the state legal system and imposing religious law by stealth.",
keywords = "Islamic law, Shariah Tribunals, populism, British Muslims",
author = "Amin Al-Astewani",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Policy Studies on 18/01/2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/19460171.2018.1564061",
year = "2019",
month = jan,
day = "18",
doi = "10.1080/19460171.2018.1564061",
language = "English",
journal = "Critical Policy Studies",
issn = "1946-0171",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - English Responses to Shariah Tribunals

T2 - A Critical Assessment of Populist Attitudes towards Islamic Law

AU - Al-Astewani, Amin

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Policy Studies on 18/01/2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/19460171.2018.1564061

PY - 2019/1/18

Y1 - 2019/1/18

N2 - Whilst the literature on populism spans almost every conceivable discipline, the study of its relationship with religion remains exceptionally sparse. This paper seeks to fill an important gap in the literature and significantly enrich the study of populism by directly addressing the way in which religion impacts upon and is connected with populist movements. It does so by addressing a particularly illuminating case-study of populist attitudes toward Islamic law in Europe, namely the English public’s response toward the formation of Shariah tribunals. As this paper shall show, the populist depiction of Shariah tribunals forced the UK government to dramatically alter its stance toward such tribunals, by framing the formation of Shariah tribunals as a malign and subversive attempt by a religious fundamentalist lobby at annexing the jurisdiction of the state legal system and imposing religious law by stealth.

AB - Whilst the literature on populism spans almost every conceivable discipline, the study of its relationship with religion remains exceptionally sparse. This paper seeks to fill an important gap in the literature and significantly enrich the study of populism by directly addressing the way in which religion impacts upon and is connected with populist movements. It does so by addressing a particularly illuminating case-study of populist attitudes toward Islamic law in Europe, namely the English public’s response toward the formation of Shariah tribunals. As this paper shall show, the populist depiction of Shariah tribunals forced the UK government to dramatically alter its stance toward such tribunals, by framing the formation of Shariah tribunals as a malign and subversive attempt by a religious fundamentalist lobby at annexing the jurisdiction of the state legal system and imposing religious law by stealth.

KW - Islamic law

KW - Shariah Tribunals

KW - populism

KW - British Muslims

U2 - 10.1080/19460171.2018.1564061

DO - 10.1080/19460171.2018.1564061

M3 - Journal article

JO - Critical Policy Studies

JF - Critical Policy Studies

SN - 1946-0171

ER -