Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Enrichment of sociolinguistic nasality research...

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • dewhurst_2023_author_accepted

    Accepted author manuscript, 454 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Enrichment of sociolinguistic nasality research with phonetic data: Methodological considerations

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Enrichment of sociolinguistic nasality research with phonetic data: Methodological considerations. / Dewhurst, Maya.
In: Modern Languages Open, 24.02.2023, p. 1-12.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Dewhurst M. Enrichment of sociolinguistic nasality research with phonetic data: Methodological considerations. Modern Languages Open. 2023 Feb 24;1-12. 7. doi: 10.3828/mlo.v0i0.453

Author

Bibtex

@article{73bd9027d519473795cd0d2bb579e608,
title = "Enrichment of sociolinguistic nasality research with phonetic data: Methodological considerations",
abstract = "Research into nasal voice quality can be seen to split itself quite neatly into two streams. In one, we find sociolinguistic studies of nasality, based on impressionistic analyses and the perceptions and opinions of na{\"i}ve listeners. These studies form the basis of what we know about the social attitudes and motivations behind nasal voice, but often do not clearly define the empirical boundaries of what is and is not nasal. On the other side lies the phonetic study of nasalisation. This stream of research has focused on the articulatory and aerodynamic realities of nasalisation, developing methods to directly measure airflow through the mouth and nose during speech, and later turning to finding acoustic correlates to accurately represent this ratio of airflow using less intrusive means. Many of these methods are quite robust but have seldom been used to observe non-laboratory speech.Crossover between the aforementioned streams of nasality research is rare but could be extremely beneficial. In this paper, established approaches to studying nasal voice in sociolinguistics and phonetics are outlined and evaluated. Existing examples of research combining the two approaches are discussed and suggestions made for future study.",
keywords = "sociophonetics, sociolinguistics, research methodologies, nasality",
author = "Maya Dewhurst",
year = "2023",
month = feb,
day = "24",
doi = "10.3828/mlo.v0i0.453",
language = "English",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "Modern Languages Open",
publisher = "Liverpool University Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enrichment of sociolinguistic nasality research with phonetic data

T2 - Methodological considerations

AU - Dewhurst, Maya

PY - 2023/2/24

Y1 - 2023/2/24

N2 - Research into nasal voice quality can be seen to split itself quite neatly into two streams. In one, we find sociolinguistic studies of nasality, based on impressionistic analyses and the perceptions and opinions of naïve listeners. These studies form the basis of what we know about the social attitudes and motivations behind nasal voice, but often do not clearly define the empirical boundaries of what is and is not nasal. On the other side lies the phonetic study of nasalisation. This stream of research has focused on the articulatory and aerodynamic realities of nasalisation, developing methods to directly measure airflow through the mouth and nose during speech, and later turning to finding acoustic correlates to accurately represent this ratio of airflow using less intrusive means. Many of these methods are quite robust but have seldom been used to observe non-laboratory speech.Crossover between the aforementioned streams of nasality research is rare but could be extremely beneficial. In this paper, established approaches to studying nasal voice in sociolinguistics and phonetics are outlined and evaluated. Existing examples of research combining the two approaches are discussed and suggestions made for future study.

AB - Research into nasal voice quality can be seen to split itself quite neatly into two streams. In one, we find sociolinguistic studies of nasality, based on impressionistic analyses and the perceptions and opinions of naïve listeners. These studies form the basis of what we know about the social attitudes and motivations behind nasal voice, but often do not clearly define the empirical boundaries of what is and is not nasal. On the other side lies the phonetic study of nasalisation. This stream of research has focused on the articulatory and aerodynamic realities of nasalisation, developing methods to directly measure airflow through the mouth and nose during speech, and later turning to finding acoustic correlates to accurately represent this ratio of airflow using less intrusive means. Many of these methods are quite robust but have seldom been used to observe non-laboratory speech.Crossover between the aforementioned streams of nasality research is rare but could be extremely beneficial. In this paper, established approaches to studying nasal voice in sociolinguistics and phonetics are outlined and evaluated. Existing examples of research combining the two approaches are discussed and suggestions made for future study.

KW - sociophonetics

KW - sociolinguistics

KW - research methodologies

KW - nasality

U2 - 10.3828/mlo.v0i0.453

DO - 10.3828/mlo.v0i0.453

M3 - Journal article

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - Modern Languages Open

JF - Modern Languages Open

M1 - 7

ER -