Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Entering the field in qualitative field research

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Entering the field in qualitative field research: a rite of passage into a complex practice world

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Entering the field in qualitative field research: a rite of passage into a complex practice world. / Chughtai, Hameed; Myers, Michael David.
In: Information Systems Journal , Vol. 27, No. 6, 30.11.2017, p. 795-817.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Chughtai H, Myers MD. Entering the field in qualitative field research: a rite of passage into a complex practice world. Information Systems Journal . 2017 Nov 30;27(6):795-817. Epub 2016 Sept 22. doi: 10.1111/isj.12124

Author

Chughtai, Hameed ; Myers, Michael David. / Entering the field in qualitative field research : a rite of passage into a complex practice world. In: Information Systems Journal . 2017 ; Vol. 27, No. 6. pp. 795-817.

Bibtex

@article{4b9519097be546c1a236e65c6faa9195,
title = "Entering the field in qualitative field research: a rite of passage into a complex practice world",
abstract = "The concept of {\textquoteleft}the field{\textquoteright} is significant in ethnographic research as well as qualitative research methods more generally. However, how a field researcher enters the field is usually taken for granted after gaining access to the field. We suggest that entrance is a distinct phase of fieldwork that differs from negotiating access. Entrance is not a trivial event; rather, it is a rite of passage into a complex practice world and marks a critical field moment. Drawing on our ethnography and insights from hermeneutics and anthropology, we show that a practical understanding of the field represents a fusion of horizons where a fieldworker is thrown. The concept of thrownness highlights the fact that the fieldworkers' own historicity and prejudices affect their entrance into the field; hence, entrance into the field orientates an ethnographer in the field and influences the entire period of fieldwork that follows. Our theorizing is intended as a contribution towards advancing the discussion of qualitative research methods.",
author = "Hameed Chughtai and Myers, {Michael David}",
year = "2017",
month = nov,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1111/isj.12124",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "795--817",
journal = "Information Systems Journal ",
issn = "1350-1917",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Entering the field in qualitative field research

T2 - a rite of passage into a complex practice world

AU - Chughtai, Hameed

AU - Myers, Michael David

PY - 2017/11/30

Y1 - 2017/11/30

N2 - The concept of ‘the field’ is significant in ethnographic research as well as qualitative research methods more generally. However, how a field researcher enters the field is usually taken for granted after gaining access to the field. We suggest that entrance is a distinct phase of fieldwork that differs from negotiating access. Entrance is not a trivial event; rather, it is a rite of passage into a complex practice world and marks a critical field moment. Drawing on our ethnography and insights from hermeneutics and anthropology, we show that a practical understanding of the field represents a fusion of horizons where a fieldworker is thrown. The concept of thrownness highlights the fact that the fieldworkers' own historicity and prejudices affect their entrance into the field; hence, entrance into the field orientates an ethnographer in the field and influences the entire period of fieldwork that follows. Our theorizing is intended as a contribution towards advancing the discussion of qualitative research methods.

AB - The concept of ‘the field’ is significant in ethnographic research as well as qualitative research methods more generally. However, how a field researcher enters the field is usually taken for granted after gaining access to the field. We suggest that entrance is a distinct phase of fieldwork that differs from negotiating access. Entrance is not a trivial event; rather, it is a rite of passage into a complex practice world and marks a critical field moment. Drawing on our ethnography and insights from hermeneutics and anthropology, we show that a practical understanding of the field represents a fusion of horizons where a fieldworker is thrown. The concept of thrownness highlights the fact that the fieldworkers' own historicity and prejudices affect their entrance into the field; hence, entrance into the field orientates an ethnographer in the field and influences the entire period of fieldwork that follows. Our theorizing is intended as a contribution towards advancing the discussion of qualitative research methods.

U2 - 10.1111/isj.12124

DO - 10.1111/isj.12124

M3 - Journal article

VL - 27

SP - 795

EP - 817

JO - Information Systems Journal

JF - Information Systems Journal

SN - 1350-1917

IS - 6

ER -