Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Enterprise as socially situated in a rural poor...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Enterprise as socially situated in a rural poor fishing community

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Enterprise as socially situated in a rural poor fishing community. / Anderson, Alistair; Obeng, Bernard A.
In: Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 49, 01.01.2017, p. 23-31.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Anderson A, Obeng BA. Enterprise as socially situated in a rural poor fishing community. Journal of Rural Studies. 2017 Jan 1;49:23-31. Epub 2016 Nov 24. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.11.015

Author

Anderson, Alistair ; Obeng, Bernard A. / Enterprise as socially situated in a rural poor fishing community. In: Journal of Rural Studies. 2017 ; Vol. 49. pp. 23-31.

Bibtex

@article{5f5a0e8238724e16967b18309c5ef636,
title = "Enterprise as socially situated in a rural poor fishing community",
abstract = "We examine enterprise processes in a poor rural fishing village in Ghana, having become interested in why poverty persists in spite of considerable industry. Our case study uses the village as the unit for analysis because it offered a conceptually interesting place that is relatively economically, socially and spatially isolated. Most entrepreneurship theory failed to explain our observations about the absence of development. Accordingly, our socialised perspective looked at the social and spatial processes that configured enterprise. Our study allowed us to recognise that fishing and the associated processing and sales had developed as socially organised to enable a livelihood for many, rather than entrepreneurial benefits for a few. The socially situated nature of rural enterprise in Ocansey Kope is “mutual” and interdependent, and not individualistic in the western sense. Enterprise is individually enacted; but how business is conducted is hedged by social obligations, responsibilities and entitlements. The apparently economic “systems” of production, the buying and selling, lending and borrowing within the village can also be understood, and better explained, as social processes.",
author = "Alistair Anderson and Obeng, {Bernard A.}",
year = "2017",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.11.015",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "23--31",
journal = "Journal of Rural Studies",
issn = "0743-0167",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enterprise as socially situated in a rural poor fishing community

AU - Anderson, Alistair

AU - Obeng, Bernard A.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - We examine enterprise processes in a poor rural fishing village in Ghana, having become interested in why poverty persists in spite of considerable industry. Our case study uses the village as the unit for analysis because it offered a conceptually interesting place that is relatively economically, socially and spatially isolated. Most entrepreneurship theory failed to explain our observations about the absence of development. Accordingly, our socialised perspective looked at the social and spatial processes that configured enterprise. Our study allowed us to recognise that fishing and the associated processing and sales had developed as socially organised to enable a livelihood for many, rather than entrepreneurial benefits for a few. The socially situated nature of rural enterprise in Ocansey Kope is “mutual” and interdependent, and not individualistic in the western sense. Enterprise is individually enacted; but how business is conducted is hedged by social obligations, responsibilities and entitlements. The apparently economic “systems” of production, the buying and selling, lending and borrowing within the village can also be understood, and better explained, as social processes.

AB - We examine enterprise processes in a poor rural fishing village in Ghana, having become interested in why poverty persists in spite of considerable industry. Our case study uses the village as the unit for analysis because it offered a conceptually interesting place that is relatively economically, socially and spatially isolated. Most entrepreneurship theory failed to explain our observations about the absence of development. Accordingly, our socialised perspective looked at the social and spatial processes that configured enterprise. Our study allowed us to recognise that fishing and the associated processing and sales had developed as socially organised to enable a livelihood for many, rather than entrepreneurial benefits for a few. The socially situated nature of rural enterprise in Ocansey Kope is “mutual” and interdependent, and not individualistic in the western sense. Enterprise is individually enacted; but how business is conducted is hedged by social obligations, responsibilities and entitlements. The apparently economic “systems” of production, the buying and selling, lending and borrowing within the village can also be understood, and better explained, as social processes.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.11.015

DO - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.11.015

M3 - Journal article

VL - 49

SP - 23

EP - 31

JO - Journal of Rural Studies

JF - Journal of Rural Studies

SN - 0743-0167

ER -