Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Entrepreneurial orientation dimensions and the ...

Electronic data

  • EMJ_2179

    Rights statement: 24m

    Accepted author manuscript, 378 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Entrepreneurial orientation dimensions and the performance of high-tech and low-tech firms: A configurational approach

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Entrepreneurial orientation dimensions and the performance of high-tech and low-tech firms: A configurational approach. / Huang, Shuangfa; Huang, Qihai; Soetanto, Danny.
In: European Management Journal, Vol. 41, No. 3, 30.06.2023, p. 375-384.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Huang S, Huang Q, Soetanto D. Entrepreneurial orientation dimensions and the performance of high-tech and low-tech firms: A configurational approach. European Management Journal. 2023 Jun 30;41(3):375-384. Epub 2022 Mar 16. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2022.03.002

Author

Huang, Shuangfa ; Huang, Qihai ; Soetanto, Danny. / Entrepreneurial orientation dimensions and the performance of high-tech and low-tech firms : A configurational approach. In: European Management Journal. 2023 ; Vol. 41, No. 3. pp. 375-384.

Bibtex

@article{ab198dceaa9d4acbb0619ab9685a6f3a,
title = "Entrepreneurial orientation dimensions and the performance of high-tech and low-tech firms: A configurational approach",
abstract = "Building on the entrepreneurial orientation (EO)-as-experimentation perspective, we examine how configurations of the EO dimensions (innovativeness, risk-taking, and proactiveness) might lead to high and low firm performance, and how the configurations differ under different firm contexts. We adopted a configurational approach and applied fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to a sample of 110 UK small and medium-sized enterprises. Our findings show that three (four) configurations can result in high (low)-firm performance, demonstrating that the EO dimensions can contribute to as well as hinder firm performance. Moreover, the configurations leading to the same outcome are distinct between high-tech and low-tech firms, indicating that the impacts of the EO dimensions on firm performance depend on the firm context. Our findings offer useful insights for managers on how to configure the portfolio of firms{\textquoteright} entrepreneurial activities to achieve superior performance.",
keywords = "Entrepreneurial orientationEntrepreneurial orientationEntrepreneurial orientationEntrepreneurial orientationEntrepreneurial orientationEntrepreneurial orientationEntrepreneurial orientationEntrepreneurial orientationEntrepreneurial orientationEntrepreneurial orientationEntrepreneurial orientationEntrepreneurial orientationEntrepreneurial orientationEntrepreneurial orientationEntrepreneurial orientationEntrepreneurial orientationEntrepreneurial orientation, Configurational approach, Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), Firm performance, fsQCA",
author = "Shuangfa Huang and Qihai Huang and Danny Soetanto",
year = "2023",
month = jun,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.emj.2022.03.002",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "375--384",
journal = "European Management Journal",
issn = "0263-2373",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Entrepreneurial orientation dimensions and the performance of high-tech and low-tech firms

T2 - A configurational approach

AU - Huang, Shuangfa

AU - Huang, Qihai

AU - Soetanto, Danny

PY - 2023/6/30

Y1 - 2023/6/30

N2 - Building on the entrepreneurial orientation (EO)-as-experimentation perspective, we examine how configurations of the EO dimensions (innovativeness, risk-taking, and proactiveness) might lead to high and low firm performance, and how the configurations differ under different firm contexts. We adopted a configurational approach and applied fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to a sample of 110 UK small and medium-sized enterprises. Our findings show that three (four) configurations can result in high (low)-firm performance, demonstrating that the EO dimensions can contribute to as well as hinder firm performance. Moreover, the configurations leading to the same outcome are distinct between high-tech and low-tech firms, indicating that the impacts of the EO dimensions on firm performance depend on the firm context. Our findings offer useful insights for managers on how to configure the portfolio of firms’ entrepreneurial activities to achieve superior performance.

AB - Building on the entrepreneurial orientation (EO)-as-experimentation perspective, we examine how configurations of the EO dimensions (innovativeness, risk-taking, and proactiveness) might lead to high and low firm performance, and how the configurations differ under different firm contexts. We adopted a configurational approach and applied fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to a sample of 110 UK small and medium-sized enterprises. Our findings show that three (four) configurations can result in high (low)-firm performance, demonstrating that the EO dimensions can contribute to as well as hinder firm performance. Moreover, the configurations leading to the same outcome are distinct between high-tech and low-tech firms, indicating that the impacts of the EO dimensions on firm performance depend on the firm context. Our findings offer useful insights for managers on how to configure the portfolio of firms’ entrepreneurial activities to achieve superior performance.

KW - Entrepreneurial orientationEntrepreneurial orientationEntrepreneurial orientationEntrepreneurial orientationEntrepreneurial orientationEntrepreneurial orientationEntrepreneurial orientationEntrepreneurial orientationEntrepreneurial orientationEntrepreneur

KW - Configurational approach

KW - Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)

KW - Firm performance

KW - fsQCA

U2 - 10.1016/j.emj.2022.03.002

DO - 10.1016/j.emj.2022.03.002

M3 - Journal article

VL - 41

SP - 375

EP - 384

JO - European Management Journal

JF - European Management Journal

SN - 0263-2373

IS - 3

ER -