Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Entry modes of foreign direct investment in Chi...

Electronic data

View graph of relations

Entry modes of foreign direct investment in China: a multinominal logit approach

Research output: Working paper

Published

Standard

Entry modes of foreign direct investment in China: a multinominal logit approach. / Liu, B; Liu, X; Wei, Y.
Lancaster University: The Department of Economics, 2004. (Economics Working Paper Series).

Research output: Working paper

Harvard

Liu, B, Liu, X & Wei, Y 2004 'Entry modes of foreign direct investment in China: a multinominal logit approach' Economics Working Paper Series, The Department of Economics, Lancaster University.

APA

Liu, B., Liu, X., & Wei, Y. (2004). Entry modes of foreign direct investment in China: a multinominal logit approach. (Economics Working Paper Series). The Department of Economics.

Vancouver

Liu B, Liu X, Wei Y. Entry modes of foreign direct investment in China: a multinominal logit approach. Lancaster University: The Department of Economics. 2004. (Economics Working Paper Series).

Author

Liu, B ; Liu, X ; Wei, Y. / Entry modes of foreign direct investment in China: a multinominal logit approach. Lancaster University : The Department of Economics, 2004. (Economics Working Paper Series).

Bibtex

@techreport{d336cbe02de049178bbdd66e68eae965,
title = "Entry modes of foreign direct investment in China: a multinominal logit approach",
abstract = "The existing empirical literature on foreign direct investment (FDI) entry strategies tends to allow a binary choice between wholly owned enterprises (WOEs) and equity joint ventures (EJVs) or between greenfield investment and acquisition only. The current study establishes a multinomial logit model for the choice from all four FDI entry modes in China. Hypotheses involving country-, industry- and firm-specific factors are developed based on transaction cost economics, and tested on a data set covering 10607 foreign invested firms in China. A foreign invested firm is found to prefer the WOE mode given its large investment commitment, a high level of host-country experience in attracting FDI, a good specific industrial location, and a high asset intensity in the host industry. If the conditions of host-country experience and good specific location are not met, the EJV and the joint stock company (JSC) modes would be of greater use. A good specific location also makes the contractual joint venture (CJV) a preferable entry mode. Compared with overseas Chinese investors from Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan, other foreign investors prefer EJVs over WOEs and CJVs. The results have important implications for managers.",
keywords = "Entry Mode, Foreign Direct Investment, Multinomial Logit Model, China",
author = "B Liu and X Liu and Y Wei",
year = "2004",
language = "English",
series = "Economics Working Paper Series",
publisher = "The Department of Economics",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "The Department of Economics",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Entry modes of foreign direct investment in China: a multinominal logit approach

AU - Liu, B

AU - Liu, X

AU - Wei, Y

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - The existing empirical literature on foreign direct investment (FDI) entry strategies tends to allow a binary choice between wholly owned enterprises (WOEs) and equity joint ventures (EJVs) or between greenfield investment and acquisition only. The current study establishes a multinomial logit model for the choice from all four FDI entry modes in China. Hypotheses involving country-, industry- and firm-specific factors are developed based on transaction cost economics, and tested on a data set covering 10607 foreign invested firms in China. A foreign invested firm is found to prefer the WOE mode given its large investment commitment, a high level of host-country experience in attracting FDI, a good specific industrial location, and a high asset intensity in the host industry. If the conditions of host-country experience and good specific location are not met, the EJV and the joint stock company (JSC) modes would be of greater use. A good specific location also makes the contractual joint venture (CJV) a preferable entry mode. Compared with overseas Chinese investors from Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan, other foreign investors prefer EJVs over WOEs and CJVs. The results have important implications for managers.

AB - The existing empirical literature on foreign direct investment (FDI) entry strategies tends to allow a binary choice between wholly owned enterprises (WOEs) and equity joint ventures (EJVs) or between greenfield investment and acquisition only. The current study establishes a multinomial logit model for the choice from all four FDI entry modes in China. Hypotheses involving country-, industry- and firm-specific factors are developed based on transaction cost economics, and tested on a data set covering 10607 foreign invested firms in China. A foreign invested firm is found to prefer the WOE mode given its large investment commitment, a high level of host-country experience in attracting FDI, a good specific industrial location, and a high asset intensity in the host industry. If the conditions of host-country experience and good specific location are not met, the EJV and the joint stock company (JSC) modes would be of greater use. A good specific location also makes the contractual joint venture (CJV) a preferable entry mode. Compared with overseas Chinese investors from Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan, other foreign investors prefer EJVs over WOEs and CJVs. The results have important implications for managers.

KW - Entry Mode

KW - Foreign Direct Investment

KW - Multinomial Logit Model

KW - China

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Economics Working Paper Series

BT - Entry modes of foreign direct investment in China: a multinominal logit approach

PB - The Department of Economics

CY - Lancaster University

ER -