Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Environmental justice and the distributional de...
View graph of relations

Environmental justice and the distributional deficit in policy appraisal in the UK.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Environmental justice and the distributional deficit in policy appraisal in the UK. / Walker, Gordon P.

In: Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2007, p. 45004.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Walker, Gordon P. / Environmental justice and the distributional deficit in policy appraisal in the UK. In: Environmental Research Letters. 2007 ; Vol. 2, No. 4. pp. 45004.

Bibtex

@article{d1439fefbddb4858821ac25fa1a48b88,
title = "Environmental justice and the distributional deficit in policy appraisal in the UK.",
abstract = "Environmental justice brings a particular set of concerns to the policy process in asking not only what the environmental impacts of a new policy, programme or regulation might be, but also how these impacts are likely to be distributed across different social groups. This letter evaluates the extent to which appraisal tools currently used to inform environmental and related decision-making in the UK incorporate the analysis of such distributional effects. It reports on research that assessed the existence of requirements for distributional analysis across 16 different appraisal tools, the depth of guidance that is provided for those using the tool and the scope of its coverage. It is concluded that there is distributional deficit in current policy and impact appraisal tools, particularly in the context of the breadth of definition of environmental justice being applied in the UK and the range of population groups with which this is concerned. Only in the health area and in the use of health impact assessment can more positive conclusions be reached. Research evaluating the use of tools in practice is needed and a number of steps to improve on the current situation are discussed.",
author = "Walker, {Gordon P.}",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1088/1748-9326/2/4/045004",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "45004",
journal = "Environmental Research Letters",
issn = "1748-9326",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Environmental justice and the distributional deficit in policy appraisal in the UK.

AU - Walker, Gordon P.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Environmental justice brings a particular set of concerns to the policy process in asking not only what the environmental impacts of a new policy, programme or regulation might be, but also how these impacts are likely to be distributed across different social groups. This letter evaluates the extent to which appraisal tools currently used to inform environmental and related decision-making in the UK incorporate the analysis of such distributional effects. It reports on research that assessed the existence of requirements for distributional analysis across 16 different appraisal tools, the depth of guidance that is provided for those using the tool and the scope of its coverage. It is concluded that there is distributional deficit in current policy and impact appraisal tools, particularly in the context of the breadth of definition of environmental justice being applied in the UK and the range of population groups with which this is concerned. Only in the health area and in the use of health impact assessment can more positive conclusions be reached. Research evaluating the use of tools in practice is needed and a number of steps to improve on the current situation are discussed.

AB - Environmental justice brings a particular set of concerns to the policy process in asking not only what the environmental impacts of a new policy, programme or regulation might be, but also how these impacts are likely to be distributed across different social groups. This letter evaluates the extent to which appraisal tools currently used to inform environmental and related decision-making in the UK incorporate the analysis of such distributional effects. It reports on research that assessed the existence of requirements for distributional analysis across 16 different appraisal tools, the depth of guidance that is provided for those using the tool and the scope of its coverage. It is concluded that there is distributional deficit in current policy and impact appraisal tools, particularly in the context of the breadth of definition of environmental justice being applied in the UK and the range of population groups with which this is concerned. Only in the health area and in the use of health impact assessment can more positive conclusions be reached. Research evaluating the use of tools in practice is needed and a number of steps to improve on the current situation are discussed.

U2 - 10.1088/1748-9326/2/4/045004

DO - 10.1088/1748-9326/2/4/045004

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2

SP - 45004

JO - Environmental Research Letters

JF - Environmental Research Letters

SN - 1748-9326

IS - 4

ER -