Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Epistemic consciousness.
View graph of relations

Epistemic consciousness.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Epistemic consciousness. / Manson, Neil C.
In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Vol. 33, No. 3, 09.2002, p. 425-441.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Manson, NC 2002, 'Epistemic consciousness.', Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 425-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(02)00025-0

APA

Manson, N. C. (2002). Epistemic consciousness. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 33(3), 425-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(02)00025-0

Vancouver

Manson NC. Epistemic consciousness. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2002 Sept;33(3):425-441. doi: 10.1016/S0039-3681(02)00025-0

Author

Manson, Neil C. / Epistemic consciousness. In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2002 ; Vol. 33, No. 3. pp. 425-441.

Bibtex

@article{460da2c2e7394fd99050633ef9f31138,
title = "Epistemic consciousness.",
abstract = "Philosophers, especially in recent years, have engaged in reflection upon the nature of experience. Such reflections have led them to draw a distinction between conscious and unconscious mentality in terms of whether or not it is like something to have a mental state. Reflection upon the history of psychology and upon contemporary cognitive science, however, identifies the distinction between conscious and unconscious mental states to be primarily one which is drawn in epistemic terms. Consciousness is an epistemic not ion marking the special kind of first-person knowledge we have of our own mental states. Psychologists have found it expedient, for explanatory reasons, to ignore or reject the assumption that we have exhaustive first-person knowledge of our mental states and, in doing so, use the term {\^a}��unconscious{\^a}�� to indicate the peculiar epistemic status of certain mental states. It is argued that epistemic consciousness is distinct from the subjective-experiential notion of consciousness, from {\^a}��access-consciousness{\^a}�� and from higher-order thought conceptions of mental state consciousness, and that epistemic consciousness has an important role to play in philosophy of mind and in the history of psychology.",
keywords = "consciousness, unconscious mind, Freud, access-consciousness, concept of consciousness",
author = "Manson, {Neil C.}",
year = "2002",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1016/S0039-3681(02)00025-0",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "425--441",
journal = "Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A",
issn = "0039-3681",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Epistemic consciousness.

AU - Manson, Neil C.

PY - 2002/9

Y1 - 2002/9

N2 - Philosophers, especially in recent years, have engaged in reflection upon the nature of experience. Such reflections have led them to draw a distinction between conscious and unconscious mentality in terms of whether or not it is like something to have a mental state. Reflection upon the history of psychology and upon contemporary cognitive science, however, identifies the distinction between conscious and unconscious mental states to be primarily one which is drawn in epistemic terms. Consciousness is an epistemic not ion marking the special kind of first-person knowledge we have of our own mental states. Psychologists have found it expedient, for explanatory reasons, to ignore or reject the assumption that we have exhaustive first-person knowledge of our mental states and, in doing so, use the term �unconscious� to indicate the peculiar epistemic status of certain mental states. It is argued that epistemic consciousness is distinct from the subjective-experiential notion of consciousness, from �access-consciousness� and from higher-order thought conceptions of mental state consciousness, and that epistemic consciousness has an important role to play in philosophy of mind and in the history of psychology.

AB - Philosophers, especially in recent years, have engaged in reflection upon the nature of experience. Such reflections have led them to draw a distinction between conscious and unconscious mentality in terms of whether or not it is like something to have a mental state. Reflection upon the history of psychology and upon contemporary cognitive science, however, identifies the distinction between conscious and unconscious mental states to be primarily one which is drawn in epistemic terms. Consciousness is an epistemic not ion marking the special kind of first-person knowledge we have of our own mental states. Psychologists have found it expedient, for explanatory reasons, to ignore or reject the assumption that we have exhaustive first-person knowledge of our mental states and, in doing so, use the term �unconscious� to indicate the peculiar epistemic status of certain mental states. It is argued that epistemic consciousness is distinct from the subjective-experiential notion of consciousness, from �access-consciousness� and from higher-order thought conceptions of mental state consciousness, and that epistemic consciousness has an important role to play in philosophy of mind and in the history of psychology.

KW - consciousness

KW - unconscious mind

KW - Freud

KW - access-consciousness

KW - concept of consciousness

U2 - 10.1016/S0039-3681(02)00025-0

DO - 10.1016/S0039-3681(02)00025-0

M3 - Journal article

VL - 33

SP - 425

EP - 441

JO - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A

JF - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A

SN - 0039-3681

IS - 3

ER -