Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Equal North

Electronic data

  • Equal_North_Health_inequalities_future_priorities_final_22.2.2018

    Rights statement: This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Journal of Public Health following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version M Addison, E Kaner, P Johnstone, F Hillier-Brown, S Moffatt, S Russell, B Barr, P Holland, S Salway, M Whitehead, C Bambra, Equal North: how can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? A prioritization exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners, Journal of Public Health, Volume 41, Issue 4, December 2019, Pages 652–664 is available online at: https://academic.oup.com/jpubhealth/article/41/4/652/5139683

    Accepted author manuscript, 877 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Equal North: How can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? Prioritisation exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Equal North: How can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? Prioritisation exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners. / Addison, Michelle; Kaner, Eileen; Johnstone, Paul et al.
In: Journal of Public Health, Vol. 41, No. 4, 01.12.2019, p. 652–664.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Addison, M, Kaner, E, Johnstone, P, Hillier-Brown, F, Moffatt, S, Russell, S, Barr, B, Holland, PJ, Salway, S, Whitehead, M & Bambra, C 2019, 'Equal North: How can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? Prioritisation exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners.', Journal of Public Health, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 652–664. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdy170

APA

Addison, M., Kaner, E., Johnstone, P., Hillier-Brown, F., Moffatt, S., Russell, S., Barr, B., Holland, P. J., Salway, S., Whitehead, M., & Bambra, C. (2019). Equal North: How can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? Prioritisation exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners. Journal of Public Health, 41(4), 652–664. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdy170

Vancouver

Addison M, Kaner E, Johnstone P, Hillier-Brown F, Moffatt S, Russell S et al. Equal North: How can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? Prioritisation exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners. Journal of Public Health. 2019 Dec 1;41(4):652–664. Epub 2018 Oct 20. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy170

Author

Addison, Michelle ; Kaner, Eileen ; Johnstone, Paul et al. / Equal North : How can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? Prioritisation exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners. In: Journal of Public Health. 2019 ; Vol. 41, No. 4. pp. 652–664.

Bibtex

@article{885349cc07c34a16bde005fc6bdc0288,
title = "Equal North: How can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? Prioritisation exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners.",
abstract = "Background: The Equal North network was developed to take forward the implications of the Due North report of the Independent Inquiry into Health Equity. A research prioritisation exercise was conducted across the network.Methods: Qualitative workshops (15 groups) and a Delphi survey (3 rounds, 368 members) were used to consult expert opinion and achieve a consensus. A further 10 workshops were conducted after the Delphi survey to triangulate the data.Results: Round one, 253 participants (n=190 participants from two sets of workshops; n=63 survey responses) answered open questions around priorities for action. In round two of the survey, 144 participants used a 5 point Likert scale to rate 39 items generated via thematic analysis of round one data. Round three: 76 participants (half of the round two participants) re-rated responses alongside median responses to each item. Poverty/implications of austerity (4.87m, IQR 0) remained the priority issue in all rounds, with long-term unemployment (4.8m, IQR 0) and mental health (4.7m, IQR 1) second and third priorities.Conclusions: A strong consensus amongst the practitioners and academics was that reducing health inequalities in the North of England requires prioritising research that tackles structural determinants concerning poverty, the implications of austerity measures and unemployment. ",
keywords = "Health inequality, social policy, engagement, Delphi, equity, social determinants ",
author = "Michelle Addison and Eileen Kaner and Paul Johnstone and Frances Hillier-Brown and Suzanne Moffatt and S Russell and Ben Barr and Holland, {Paula Jane} and Sarah Salway and Margaret Whitehead and Clare Bambra",
note = "This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Journal of Public Health following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version M Addison, E Kaner, P Johnstone, F Hillier-Brown, S Moffatt, S Russell, B Barr, P Holland, S Salway, M Whitehead, C Bambra, Equal North: how can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? A prioritization exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners, Journal of Public Health, Volume 41, Issue 4, December 2019, Pages 652–664 is available online at: https://academic.oup.com/jpubhealth/article/41/4/652/5139683",
year = "2019",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/pubmed/fdy170",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "652–664",
journal = "Journal of Public Health",
issn = "1741-3842",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Equal North

T2 - How can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? Prioritisation exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners.

AU - Addison, Michelle

AU - Kaner, Eileen

AU - Johnstone, Paul

AU - Hillier-Brown, Frances

AU - Moffatt, Suzanne

AU - Russell, S

AU - Barr, Ben

AU - Holland, Paula Jane

AU - Salway, Sarah

AU - Whitehead, Margaret

AU - Bambra, Clare

N1 - This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Journal of Public Health following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version M Addison, E Kaner, P Johnstone, F Hillier-Brown, S Moffatt, S Russell, B Barr, P Holland, S Salway, M Whitehead, C Bambra, Equal North: how can we reduce health inequalities in the North of England? A prioritization exercise with researchers, policymakers and practitioners, Journal of Public Health, Volume 41, Issue 4, December 2019, Pages 652–664 is available online at: https://academic.oup.com/jpubhealth/article/41/4/652/5139683

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - Background: The Equal North network was developed to take forward the implications of the Due North report of the Independent Inquiry into Health Equity. A research prioritisation exercise was conducted across the network.Methods: Qualitative workshops (15 groups) and a Delphi survey (3 rounds, 368 members) were used to consult expert opinion and achieve a consensus. A further 10 workshops were conducted after the Delphi survey to triangulate the data.Results: Round one, 253 participants (n=190 participants from two sets of workshops; n=63 survey responses) answered open questions around priorities for action. In round two of the survey, 144 participants used a 5 point Likert scale to rate 39 items generated via thematic analysis of round one data. Round three: 76 participants (half of the round two participants) re-rated responses alongside median responses to each item. Poverty/implications of austerity (4.87m, IQR 0) remained the priority issue in all rounds, with long-term unemployment (4.8m, IQR 0) and mental health (4.7m, IQR 1) second and third priorities.Conclusions: A strong consensus amongst the practitioners and academics was that reducing health inequalities in the North of England requires prioritising research that tackles structural determinants concerning poverty, the implications of austerity measures and unemployment.

AB - Background: The Equal North network was developed to take forward the implications of the Due North report of the Independent Inquiry into Health Equity. A research prioritisation exercise was conducted across the network.Methods: Qualitative workshops (15 groups) and a Delphi survey (3 rounds, 368 members) were used to consult expert opinion and achieve a consensus. A further 10 workshops were conducted after the Delphi survey to triangulate the data.Results: Round one, 253 participants (n=190 participants from two sets of workshops; n=63 survey responses) answered open questions around priorities for action. In round two of the survey, 144 participants used a 5 point Likert scale to rate 39 items generated via thematic analysis of round one data. Round three: 76 participants (half of the round two participants) re-rated responses alongside median responses to each item. Poverty/implications of austerity (4.87m, IQR 0) remained the priority issue in all rounds, with long-term unemployment (4.8m, IQR 0) and mental health (4.7m, IQR 1) second and third priorities.Conclusions: A strong consensus amongst the practitioners and academics was that reducing health inequalities in the North of England requires prioritising research that tackles structural determinants concerning poverty, the implications of austerity measures and unemployment.

KW - Health inequality

KW - social policy

KW - engagement

KW - Delphi

KW - equity

KW - social determinants

U2 - 10.1093/pubmed/fdy170

DO - 10.1093/pubmed/fdy170

M3 - Journal article

VL - 41

SP - 652

EP - 664

JO - Journal of Public Health

JF - Journal of Public Health

SN - 1741-3842

IS - 4

ER -