Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Errors towards the perpendicular in children's ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Errors towards the perpendicular in children's copies of angular figures: A test of the bisection interpretation

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Errors towards the perpendicular in children's copies of angular figures: A test of the bisection interpretation. / Bremner, J. Gavin.

In: Perception, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1984, p. 117-128.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{664eec290da644c2af4220812e844793,
title = "Errors towards the perpendicular in children's copies of angular figures: A test of the bisection interpretation",
abstract = "24 4-yr-olds were tested on 2 types of angular figures--a baseline with another line joining at the end at 45, 90, or 135° and a baseline with line joining at the middle at 45 or 90°--to establish whether a perpendicular bias would appear independently of bisection. It is noted that children distort angular figures so that the constituent angles are nearer 90° than they should be, which could be due to a perpendicular bias, a bisection bias, or both. Results show that perpendicular errors were obtained both for end and middle figures, but overall more strongly for middle figures. While 90° middle figures were copied more accurately than 45 or 135° figures, this effect was only obtained for vertical and horizontal presentations of end figures and was reversed for oblique presentations. For end figures, directional errors varied with subtended-line orientation, whereas they varied with baseline orientation for middle figures. It is concluded that, although errors toward the perpendicular do occur with single-angle figures, angle equalization may take place when there are 2 adjacent angles in the figure. An interpretation of the differing orientation effects is that, in middle figures, strong internal relational forces produce a distortion that varies with the angle at which the figure is viewed; in end figures, the absence of relational forces within the figure leads to a stronger influence from external cues. (19 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved) ",
author = "Bremner, {J. Gavin}",
year = "1984",
doi = "10.1068/p130117",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "117--128",
journal = "Perception",
issn = "0301-0066",
publisher = "Pion Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Errors towards the perpendicular in children's copies of angular figures: A test of the bisection interpretation

AU - Bremner, J. Gavin

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - 24 4-yr-olds were tested on 2 types of angular figures--a baseline with another line joining at the end at 45, 90, or 135° and a baseline with line joining at the middle at 45 or 90°--to establish whether a perpendicular bias would appear independently of bisection. It is noted that children distort angular figures so that the constituent angles are nearer 90° than they should be, which could be due to a perpendicular bias, a bisection bias, or both. Results show that perpendicular errors were obtained both for end and middle figures, but overall more strongly for middle figures. While 90° middle figures were copied more accurately than 45 or 135° figures, this effect was only obtained for vertical and horizontal presentations of end figures and was reversed for oblique presentations. For end figures, directional errors varied with subtended-line orientation, whereas they varied with baseline orientation for middle figures. It is concluded that, although errors toward the perpendicular do occur with single-angle figures, angle equalization may take place when there are 2 adjacent angles in the figure. An interpretation of the differing orientation effects is that, in middle figures, strong internal relational forces produce a distortion that varies with the angle at which the figure is viewed; in end figures, the absence of relational forces within the figure leads to a stronger influence from external cues. (19 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

AB - 24 4-yr-olds were tested on 2 types of angular figures--a baseline with another line joining at the end at 45, 90, or 135° and a baseline with line joining at the middle at 45 or 90°--to establish whether a perpendicular bias would appear independently of bisection. It is noted that children distort angular figures so that the constituent angles are nearer 90° than they should be, which could be due to a perpendicular bias, a bisection bias, or both. Results show that perpendicular errors were obtained both for end and middle figures, but overall more strongly for middle figures. While 90° middle figures were copied more accurately than 45 or 135° figures, this effect was only obtained for vertical and horizontal presentations of end figures and was reversed for oblique presentations. For end figures, directional errors varied with subtended-line orientation, whereas they varied with baseline orientation for middle figures. It is concluded that, although errors toward the perpendicular do occur with single-angle figures, angle equalization may take place when there are 2 adjacent angles in the figure. An interpretation of the differing orientation effects is that, in middle figures, strong internal relational forces produce a distortion that varies with the angle at which the figure is viewed; in end figures, the absence of relational forces within the figure leads to a stronger influence from external cues. (19 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

U2 - 10.1068/p130117

DO - 10.1068/p130117

M3 - Journal article

VL - 13

SP - 117

EP - 128

JO - Perception

JF - Perception

SN - 0301-0066

IS - 2

ER -