Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Essays on Factor Portfolios

Electronic data

  • 2025vasilasphd

    Final published version, 17.2 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Essays on Factor Portfolios

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Published

Standard

Essays on Factor Portfolios. / Vasilas, Nikolas.
Lancaster University, 2025. 185 p.

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Harvard

APA

Vasilas, N. (2025). Essays on Factor Portfolios. [Doctoral Thesis, Lancaster University]. Lancaster University. https://doi.org/10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2606

Vancouver

Vasilas N. Essays on Factor Portfolios. Lancaster University, 2025. 185 p. doi: 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2606

Author

Vasilas, Nikolas. / Essays on Factor Portfolios. Lancaster University, 2025. 185 p.

Bibtex

@phdthesis{82a08c72d96b4a0dbb2acfccd6b6e8cf,
title = "Essays on Factor Portfolios",
abstract = "This thesis explores innovative approaches to factor investing by examining the dynamics of factor portfolios and introducing novel methodologies for constructing and utilizing characteristic-based equity factors. Chapter 1 addresses the predictability of factor portfolios within the context of factor timing. This is achieved by extending stock return predictability to a portfolio level and using various dimension reduction techniques in both the characteristics and returns space. The analysis demonstrates that factor portfolios are predictable based not only on their own but also on other characteristics, highlighting the significant potential for asset return prediction. This finding also suggests that different portfolios share similarities in terms of signal sources or underlying factors.Chapter 2 introduces a new technique for constructing characteristic-based equity factors, termed \say{power sorting}. This method leverages the non-linearities and asymmetries inherent in characteristic-return relationships while maintaining computational simplicity and avoiding excessive weighting. Empirical analysis shows that power sorting consistently delivers superior out-of-sample performance compared to traditional quantile sorting and other factor portfolio construction methods. The approach proves robust across different factors and time periods, with its effectiveness not attributable to increased turnover or tail risk. Moreover, power-sorted versions of well-known asset pricing factor models outperform their original counterparts.Extending the power sorting methodology to the multivariate level, Chapter 3 investigates the evolution of portfolio dynamics when multiple characteristics are jointly considered. While Chapter 2 shows that, in a univariate context, individual characteristics drive portfolio performance primarily through the short side, the analysis in Chapter 3 reveals a shift in importance to the long side when characteristics are jointly analyzed. The multivariate power sorting approach achieves two key objectives: the development of multifactor strategies with significantly enhanced risk-adjusted performance and the construction of a six-factor model that effectively spans the tangency portfolio.",
author = "Nikolas Vasilas",
year = "2025",
doi = "10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2606",
language = "English",
publisher = "Lancaster University",
school = "Lancaster University",

}

RIS

TY - BOOK

T1 - Essays on Factor Portfolios

AU - Vasilas, Nikolas

PY - 2025

Y1 - 2025

N2 - This thesis explores innovative approaches to factor investing by examining the dynamics of factor portfolios and introducing novel methodologies for constructing and utilizing characteristic-based equity factors. Chapter 1 addresses the predictability of factor portfolios within the context of factor timing. This is achieved by extending stock return predictability to a portfolio level and using various dimension reduction techniques in both the characteristics and returns space. The analysis demonstrates that factor portfolios are predictable based not only on their own but also on other characteristics, highlighting the significant potential for asset return prediction. This finding also suggests that different portfolios share similarities in terms of signal sources or underlying factors.Chapter 2 introduces a new technique for constructing characteristic-based equity factors, termed \say{power sorting}. This method leverages the non-linearities and asymmetries inherent in characteristic-return relationships while maintaining computational simplicity and avoiding excessive weighting. Empirical analysis shows that power sorting consistently delivers superior out-of-sample performance compared to traditional quantile sorting and other factor portfolio construction methods. The approach proves robust across different factors and time periods, with its effectiveness not attributable to increased turnover or tail risk. Moreover, power-sorted versions of well-known asset pricing factor models outperform their original counterparts.Extending the power sorting methodology to the multivariate level, Chapter 3 investigates the evolution of portfolio dynamics when multiple characteristics are jointly considered. While Chapter 2 shows that, in a univariate context, individual characteristics drive portfolio performance primarily through the short side, the analysis in Chapter 3 reveals a shift in importance to the long side when characteristics are jointly analyzed. The multivariate power sorting approach achieves two key objectives: the development of multifactor strategies with significantly enhanced risk-adjusted performance and the construction of a six-factor model that effectively spans the tangency portfolio.

AB - This thesis explores innovative approaches to factor investing by examining the dynamics of factor portfolios and introducing novel methodologies for constructing and utilizing characteristic-based equity factors. Chapter 1 addresses the predictability of factor portfolios within the context of factor timing. This is achieved by extending stock return predictability to a portfolio level and using various dimension reduction techniques in both the characteristics and returns space. The analysis demonstrates that factor portfolios are predictable based not only on their own but also on other characteristics, highlighting the significant potential for asset return prediction. This finding also suggests that different portfolios share similarities in terms of signal sources or underlying factors.Chapter 2 introduces a new technique for constructing characteristic-based equity factors, termed \say{power sorting}. This method leverages the non-linearities and asymmetries inherent in characteristic-return relationships while maintaining computational simplicity and avoiding excessive weighting. Empirical analysis shows that power sorting consistently delivers superior out-of-sample performance compared to traditional quantile sorting and other factor portfolio construction methods. The approach proves robust across different factors and time periods, with its effectiveness not attributable to increased turnover or tail risk. Moreover, power-sorted versions of well-known asset pricing factor models outperform their original counterparts.Extending the power sorting methodology to the multivariate level, Chapter 3 investigates the evolution of portfolio dynamics when multiple characteristics are jointly considered. While Chapter 2 shows that, in a univariate context, individual characteristics drive portfolio performance primarily through the short side, the analysis in Chapter 3 reveals a shift in importance to the long side when characteristics are jointly analyzed. The multivariate power sorting approach achieves two key objectives: the development of multifactor strategies with significantly enhanced risk-adjusted performance and the construction of a six-factor model that effectively spans the tangency portfolio.

U2 - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2606

DO - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2606

M3 - Doctoral Thesis

PB - Lancaster University

ER -