Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Estimation of Genetic Correlation via Linkage D...

Electronic data

  • GN_simulation_maintext_20180319_clean2biorxiv

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in American Journal of Human Genetics . Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in American Journal of Human Genetics, 102 (6), 2018 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.03.021

    Accepted author manuscript, 777 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Estimation of Genetic Correlation via Linkage Disequilibrium Score Regression and Genomic Restricted Maximum Likelihood

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Estimation of Genetic Correlation via Linkage Disequilibrium Score Regression and Genomic Restricted Maximum Likelihood. / Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium.
In: American Journal of Human Genetics, Vol. 102, No. 6, 07.06.2018, p. 1185-1194.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium 2018, 'Estimation of Genetic Correlation via Linkage Disequilibrium Score Regression and Genomic Restricted Maximum Likelihood', American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 102, no. 6, pp. 1185-1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.03.021

APA

Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (2018). Estimation of Genetic Correlation via Linkage Disequilibrium Score Regression and Genomic Restricted Maximum Likelihood. American Journal of Human Genetics, 102(6), 1185-1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.03.021

Vancouver

Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. Estimation of Genetic Correlation via Linkage Disequilibrium Score Regression and Genomic Restricted Maximum Likelihood. American Journal of Human Genetics. 2018 Jun 7;102(6):1185-1194. Epub 2018 May 10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.03.021

Author

Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. / Estimation of Genetic Correlation via Linkage Disequilibrium Score Regression and Genomic Restricted Maximum Likelihood. In: American Journal of Human Genetics. 2018 ; Vol. 102, No. 6. pp. 1185-1194.

Bibtex

@article{d33e5c19a534415f9a834e17e8f5ee55,
title = "Estimation of Genetic Correlation via Linkage Disequilibrium Score Regression and Genomic Restricted Maximum Likelihood",
abstract = "Genetic correlation is a key population parameter that describes the shared genetic architecture of complex traits and diseases. It can be estimated by current state-of-art methods, i.e., linkage disequilibrium score regression (LDSC) and genomic restricted maximum likelihood (GREML). The massively reduced computing burden of LDSC compared to GREML makes it an attractive tool, although the accuracy (i.e., magnitude of standard errors) of LDSC estimates has not been thoroughly studied. In simulation, we show that the accuracy of GREML is generally higher than that of LDSC. When there is genetic heterogeneity between the actual sample and reference data from which LD scores are estimated, the accuracy of LDSC decreases further. In real data analyses estimating the genetic correlation between schizophrenia (SCZ) and body mass index, we show that GREML estimates based on ∼150,000 individuals give a higher accuracy than LDSC estimates based on ∼400,000 individuals (from combined meta-data). A GREML genomic partitioning analysis reveals that the genetic correlation between SCZ and height is significantly negative for regulatory regions, which whole genome or LDSC approach has less power to detect. We conclude that LDSC estimates should be carefully interpreted as there can be uncertainty about homogeneity among combined meta-datasets. We suggest that any interesting findings from massive LDSC analysis for a large number of complex traits should be followed up, where possible, with more detailed analyses with GREML methods, even if sample sizes are lesser.",
keywords = "linkage disequilibrium score regression, genomic restricted maximum likelihood, genetic correlation, schizophrenia, body mass index, height, SNP heritability, accuracy, biasedness, genome-wide SNPs",
author = "Guiyan Ni and Gerhard Moser and Wray, {Naomi R} and Lee, {S Hong} and Jo Knight and {Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium}",
note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in American Journal of Human Genetics . Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in American Journal of Human Genetics, 102 (6), 2018 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.03.021",
year = "2018",
month = jun,
day = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.03.021",
language = "English",
volume = "102",
pages = "1185--1194",
journal = "American Journal of Human Genetics",
issn = "0002-9297",
publisher = "Cell Press",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimation of Genetic Correlation via Linkage Disequilibrium Score Regression and Genomic Restricted Maximum Likelihood

AU - Ni, Guiyan

AU - Moser, Gerhard

AU - Wray, Naomi R

AU - Lee, S Hong

AU - Knight, Jo

AU - Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in American Journal of Human Genetics . Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in American Journal of Human Genetics, 102 (6), 2018 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.03.021

PY - 2018/6/7

Y1 - 2018/6/7

N2 - Genetic correlation is a key population parameter that describes the shared genetic architecture of complex traits and diseases. It can be estimated by current state-of-art methods, i.e., linkage disequilibrium score regression (LDSC) and genomic restricted maximum likelihood (GREML). The massively reduced computing burden of LDSC compared to GREML makes it an attractive tool, although the accuracy (i.e., magnitude of standard errors) of LDSC estimates has not been thoroughly studied. In simulation, we show that the accuracy of GREML is generally higher than that of LDSC. When there is genetic heterogeneity between the actual sample and reference data from which LD scores are estimated, the accuracy of LDSC decreases further. In real data analyses estimating the genetic correlation between schizophrenia (SCZ) and body mass index, we show that GREML estimates based on ∼150,000 individuals give a higher accuracy than LDSC estimates based on ∼400,000 individuals (from combined meta-data). A GREML genomic partitioning analysis reveals that the genetic correlation between SCZ and height is significantly negative for regulatory regions, which whole genome or LDSC approach has less power to detect. We conclude that LDSC estimates should be carefully interpreted as there can be uncertainty about homogeneity among combined meta-datasets. We suggest that any interesting findings from massive LDSC analysis for a large number of complex traits should be followed up, where possible, with more detailed analyses with GREML methods, even if sample sizes are lesser.

AB - Genetic correlation is a key population parameter that describes the shared genetic architecture of complex traits and diseases. It can be estimated by current state-of-art methods, i.e., linkage disequilibrium score regression (LDSC) and genomic restricted maximum likelihood (GREML). The massively reduced computing burden of LDSC compared to GREML makes it an attractive tool, although the accuracy (i.e., magnitude of standard errors) of LDSC estimates has not been thoroughly studied. In simulation, we show that the accuracy of GREML is generally higher than that of LDSC. When there is genetic heterogeneity between the actual sample and reference data from which LD scores are estimated, the accuracy of LDSC decreases further. In real data analyses estimating the genetic correlation between schizophrenia (SCZ) and body mass index, we show that GREML estimates based on ∼150,000 individuals give a higher accuracy than LDSC estimates based on ∼400,000 individuals (from combined meta-data). A GREML genomic partitioning analysis reveals that the genetic correlation between SCZ and height is significantly negative for regulatory regions, which whole genome or LDSC approach has less power to detect. We conclude that LDSC estimates should be carefully interpreted as there can be uncertainty about homogeneity among combined meta-datasets. We suggest that any interesting findings from massive LDSC analysis for a large number of complex traits should be followed up, where possible, with more detailed analyses with GREML methods, even if sample sizes are lesser.

KW - linkage disequilibrium score regression

KW - genomic restricted maximum likelihood

KW - genetic correlation

KW - schizophrenia

KW - body mass index

KW - height

KW - SNP heritability

KW - accuracy

KW - biasedness

KW - genome-wide SNPs

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.03.021

DO - 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.03.021

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 29754766

VL - 102

SP - 1185

EP - 1194

JO - American Journal of Human Genetics

JF - American Journal of Human Genetics

SN - 0002-9297

IS - 6

ER -