Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Evaluating line concepts using travel times and...
View graph of relations

Evaluating line concepts using travel times and robustness: simulations with the LinTim toolbox

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Evaluating line concepts using travel times and robustness: simulations with the LinTim toolbox. / Goerigk, Marc; Schachtebeck, Michael; Schöbel, Anita.
In: Public Transport, Vol. 5, No. 3, 10.2013, p. 267-284.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Goerigk M, Schachtebeck M, Schöbel A. Evaluating line concepts using travel times and robustness: simulations with the LinTim toolbox. Public Transport. 2013 Oct;5(3):267-284. Epub 2013 Sept 12. doi: 10.1007/s12469-013-0072-x

Author

Goerigk, Marc ; Schachtebeck, Michael ; Schöbel, Anita. / Evaluating line concepts using travel times and robustness : simulations with the LinTim toolbox. In: Public Transport. 2013 ; Vol. 5, No. 3. pp. 267-284.

Bibtex

@article{c13dc0fbcca840c0955e7d253c4be666,
title = "Evaluating line concepts using travel times and robustness: simulations with the LinTim toolbox",
abstract = "Line planning is an early step in the planning process in public transportation, usually followed by designing the timetable. The problems related to both steps are known to be NP-hard, and an integrated model finding a line plan and a timetable simultaneously seems out of scope from a computational point of view. However, the line plan influences also the quality of the timetable to be computed in the next planning step. In this paper we analyze the impact of different line planning models by comparing not only typical characteristics of the line plans, but also their impact on timetables and their robustness against delays. To this end, we set up a simulation platform LinTim which enables us to compute a timetable for each line concept and to experimentally evaluate its performance under delays. Using the German railway intercity network, we evaluate the quality of different line plans from a line planning, a timetabling, and a delay management perspective.",
keywords = "Case study, Delay management, Experiments, Integrated model, Line planning, Public transport, Timetabling",
author = "Marc Goerigk and Michael Schachtebeck and Anita Sch{\"o}bel",
year = "2013",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1007/s12469-013-0072-x",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "267--284",
journal = "Public Transport",
issn = "1866-749X",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating line concepts using travel times and robustness

T2 - simulations with the LinTim toolbox

AU - Goerigk, Marc

AU - Schachtebeck, Michael

AU - Schöbel, Anita

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - Line planning is an early step in the planning process in public transportation, usually followed by designing the timetable. The problems related to both steps are known to be NP-hard, and an integrated model finding a line plan and a timetable simultaneously seems out of scope from a computational point of view. However, the line plan influences also the quality of the timetable to be computed in the next planning step. In this paper we analyze the impact of different line planning models by comparing not only typical characteristics of the line plans, but also their impact on timetables and their robustness against delays. To this end, we set up a simulation platform LinTim which enables us to compute a timetable for each line concept and to experimentally evaluate its performance under delays. Using the German railway intercity network, we evaluate the quality of different line plans from a line planning, a timetabling, and a delay management perspective.

AB - Line planning is an early step in the planning process in public transportation, usually followed by designing the timetable. The problems related to both steps are known to be NP-hard, and an integrated model finding a line plan and a timetable simultaneously seems out of scope from a computational point of view. However, the line plan influences also the quality of the timetable to be computed in the next planning step. In this paper we analyze the impact of different line planning models by comparing not only typical characteristics of the line plans, but also their impact on timetables and their robustness against delays. To this end, we set up a simulation platform LinTim which enables us to compute a timetable for each line concept and to experimentally evaluate its performance under delays. Using the German railway intercity network, we evaluate the quality of different line plans from a line planning, a timetabling, and a delay management perspective.

KW - Case study

KW - Delay management

KW - Experiments

KW - Integrated model

KW - Line planning

KW - Public transport

KW - Timetabling

U2 - 10.1007/s12469-013-0072-x

DO - 10.1007/s12469-013-0072-x

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84884861040

VL - 5

SP - 267

EP - 284

JO - Public Transport

JF - Public Transport

SN - 1866-749X

IS - 3

ER -