Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Evaluation of Dissolved Organic Carbon as a Soi...

Electronic data

  • journal.pone.0090882

    Rights statement: c2014 Jones et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

    Final published version, 537 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Evaluation of Dissolved Organic Carbon as a Soil Quality Indicator in National Monitoring Schemes

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Evaluation of Dissolved Organic Carbon as a Soil Quality Indicator in National Monitoring Schemes. / Jones, David L.; Simfukwe, Paul; Hill, Paul W. et al.
In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 9, No. 3, 90882, 14.03.2014.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Jones DL, Simfukwe P, Hill PW, Mills RTE, Emmett BA. Evaluation of Dissolved Organic Carbon as a Soil Quality Indicator in National Monitoring Schemes. PLoS ONE. 2014 Mar 14;9(3):90882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090882

Author

Jones, David L. ; Simfukwe, Paul ; Hill, Paul W. et al. / Evaluation of Dissolved Organic Carbon as a Soil Quality Indicator in National Monitoring Schemes. In: PLoS ONE. 2014 ; Vol. 9, No. 3.

Bibtex

@article{1bdae63fe66d4b7eb5bf71b090f4a77d,
title = "Evaluation of Dissolved Organic Carbon as a Soil Quality Indicator in National Monitoring Schemes",
abstract = "Background: Monitoring the properties of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in soil water is frequently used to evaluate changes in soil quality and to explain shifts in freshwater ecosystem functioning.Methods: Using >700 individual soils (0-15 cm) collected from a 209,331 km(2) area we evaluated the relationship between soil classification (7 major soil types) or vegetation cover (8 dominant classes, e. g. cropland, grassland, forest) and the absorbance properties (254 and 400 nm), DOC quantity and quality (SUVA, total soluble phenolics) of soil water.Results: Overall, a good correlation (r(2) = 0.58) was apparent between soil water absorbance and DOC concentration across the diverse range of soil types tested. In contrast, both DOC and the absorbance properties of soil water provided a poor predictor of SUVA or soluble phenolics which we used as a measure of humic substance concentration. Significant overlap in the measured ranges for UV absorbance, DOC, phenolic content and especially SUVA of soil water were apparent between the 8 vegetation and 7 soil classes. A number of significant differences, however, were apparent within these populations with total soluble phenolics giving the greatest statistical separation between both soil and vegetation groups.Conclusions: We conclude that the quality of DOC rather than its quantity provides a more useful measure of soil quality in large scale surveys.",
keywords = "ULTRAVIOLET ABSORBENCY, UV-ABSORBENCY, MATTER, WATER, DOC, COUNTRYSIDE, ABSORPTION, PHOTOMETRY, FOLIN",
author = "Jones, {David L.} and Paul Simfukwe and Hill, {Paul W.} and Mills, {Robert T. E.} and Emmett, {Bridget A.}",
note = "c2014 Jones et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.",
year = "2014",
month = mar,
day = "14",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0090882",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of Dissolved Organic Carbon as a Soil Quality Indicator in National Monitoring Schemes

AU - Jones, David L.

AU - Simfukwe, Paul

AU - Hill, Paul W.

AU - Mills, Robert T. E.

AU - Emmett, Bridget A.

N1 - c2014 Jones et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

PY - 2014/3/14

Y1 - 2014/3/14

N2 - Background: Monitoring the properties of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in soil water is frequently used to evaluate changes in soil quality and to explain shifts in freshwater ecosystem functioning.Methods: Using >700 individual soils (0-15 cm) collected from a 209,331 km(2) area we evaluated the relationship between soil classification (7 major soil types) or vegetation cover (8 dominant classes, e. g. cropland, grassland, forest) and the absorbance properties (254 and 400 nm), DOC quantity and quality (SUVA, total soluble phenolics) of soil water.Results: Overall, a good correlation (r(2) = 0.58) was apparent between soil water absorbance and DOC concentration across the diverse range of soil types tested. In contrast, both DOC and the absorbance properties of soil water provided a poor predictor of SUVA or soluble phenolics which we used as a measure of humic substance concentration. Significant overlap in the measured ranges for UV absorbance, DOC, phenolic content and especially SUVA of soil water were apparent between the 8 vegetation and 7 soil classes. A number of significant differences, however, were apparent within these populations with total soluble phenolics giving the greatest statistical separation between both soil and vegetation groups.Conclusions: We conclude that the quality of DOC rather than its quantity provides a more useful measure of soil quality in large scale surveys.

AB - Background: Monitoring the properties of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in soil water is frequently used to evaluate changes in soil quality and to explain shifts in freshwater ecosystem functioning.Methods: Using >700 individual soils (0-15 cm) collected from a 209,331 km(2) area we evaluated the relationship between soil classification (7 major soil types) or vegetation cover (8 dominant classes, e. g. cropland, grassland, forest) and the absorbance properties (254 and 400 nm), DOC quantity and quality (SUVA, total soluble phenolics) of soil water.Results: Overall, a good correlation (r(2) = 0.58) was apparent between soil water absorbance and DOC concentration across the diverse range of soil types tested. In contrast, both DOC and the absorbance properties of soil water provided a poor predictor of SUVA or soluble phenolics which we used as a measure of humic substance concentration. Significant overlap in the measured ranges for UV absorbance, DOC, phenolic content and especially SUVA of soil water were apparent between the 8 vegetation and 7 soil classes. A number of significant differences, however, were apparent within these populations with total soluble phenolics giving the greatest statistical separation between both soil and vegetation groups.Conclusions: We conclude that the quality of DOC rather than its quantity provides a more useful measure of soil quality in large scale surveys.

KW - ULTRAVIOLET ABSORBENCY

KW - UV-ABSORBENCY

KW - MATTER

KW - WATER

KW - DOC

KW - COUNTRYSIDE

KW - ABSORPTION

KW - PHOTOMETRY

KW - FOLIN

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0090882

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0090882

M3 - Journal article

VL - 9

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 3

M1 - 90882

ER -