Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Evaluation of Hospital Antimicrobial Stewardshi...

Associated organisational unit

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Evaluation of Hospital Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs: Implementation, Process, Impact, and Outcomes, Review of Systematic Reviews

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Evaluation of Hospital Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs: Implementation, Process, Impact, and Outcomes, Review of Systematic Reviews. / Abdel Hadi, Hamad; Eltayeb, Faiha; Al Balushi, Sara et al.
In: Antibiotics, Vol. 13, No. 3, 253, 12.03.2024.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Abdel Hadi H, Eltayeb F, Al Balushi S, Daghfal J, Ahmed F, Mateus C. Evaluation of Hospital Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs: Implementation, Process, Impact, and Outcomes, Review of Systematic Reviews. Antibiotics. 2024 Mar 12;13(3):253. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13030253

Author

Abdel Hadi, Hamad ; Eltayeb, Faiha ; Al Balushi, Sara et al. / Evaluation of Hospital Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs : Implementation, Process, Impact, and Outcomes, Review of Systematic Reviews. In: Antibiotics. 2024 ; Vol. 13, No. 3.

Bibtex

@article{1433400f558c49fea3bdbcd88a29e8ff,
title = "Evaluation of Hospital Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs: Implementation, Process, Impact, and Outcomes, Review of Systematic Reviews",
abstract = "Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASP) were introduced in healthcare as a public health priority to promote appropriate prescribing of antimicrobials, to reduce adverse events related to antimicrobials, as well as to control the escalating challenges of antimicrobial resistance. To deliver aimed outcome objectives, ASPs involve multiple connected implementation process measures. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate both concepts of ASPs. Guided by PRISMA frames, published systematic reviews (SR) focusing on ASPs restricted to secondary and tertiary healthcare were evaluated over the past 10 years involving all age groups. Out of 265 identified SR studies, 63 met the inclusion criteria. The majority were conducted in Europe and North America, with limited studies from other regions. In the reviewed studies, all age groups were examined, although they were conducted mainly on adults when compared to children and infants. Both process and outcomes measures of ASPs were examined equally and simultaneously through 25 different concepts, dominated by efficacy, antimicrobial resistance, and economic impact, while information technology as well as role of pharmacy and behavioral factors were equally examined. The main broad conclusions from the review were that, across the globe, ASPs demonstrated effectiveness, proved efficacy, and confirmed efficiency, while focused evaluation advocated that developed countries should target medium- and small-sized hospitals while developing countries should continue rolling ASPs across healthcare facilities. Additionally, the future of ASPs should focus on embracing evolving information technology to bridge the gaps in knowledge, skills, and attitude, as well as to enhance appropriate decision making.",
keywords = "Pharmacology (medical), Infectious Diseases, Microbiology (medical), General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics, Biochemistry, Microbiology",
author = "{Abdel Hadi}, Hamad and Faiha Eltayeb and {Al Balushi}, Sara and Joanne Daghfal and Faraz Ahmed and Ceu Mateus",
year = "2024",
month = mar,
day = "12",
doi = "10.3390/antibiotics13030253",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "Antibiotics",
issn = "2079-6382",
publisher = "MDPI - Open Access Publishing",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of Hospital Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs

T2 - Implementation, Process, Impact, and Outcomes, Review of Systematic Reviews

AU - Abdel Hadi, Hamad

AU - Eltayeb, Faiha

AU - Al Balushi, Sara

AU - Daghfal, Joanne

AU - Ahmed, Faraz

AU - Mateus, Ceu

PY - 2024/3/12

Y1 - 2024/3/12

N2 - Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASP) were introduced in healthcare as a public health priority to promote appropriate prescribing of antimicrobials, to reduce adverse events related to antimicrobials, as well as to control the escalating challenges of antimicrobial resistance. To deliver aimed outcome objectives, ASPs involve multiple connected implementation process measures. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate both concepts of ASPs. Guided by PRISMA frames, published systematic reviews (SR) focusing on ASPs restricted to secondary and tertiary healthcare were evaluated over the past 10 years involving all age groups. Out of 265 identified SR studies, 63 met the inclusion criteria. The majority were conducted in Europe and North America, with limited studies from other regions. In the reviewed studies, all age groups were examined, although they were conducted mainly on adults when compared to children and infants. Both process and outcomes measures of ASPs were examined equally and simultaneously through 25 different concepts, dominated by efficacy, antimicrobial resistance, and economic impact, while information technology as well as role of pharmacy and behavioral factors were equally examined. The main broad conclusions from the review were that, across the globe, ASPs demonstrated effectiveness, proved efficacy, and confirmed efficiency, while focused evaluation advocated that developed countries should target medium- and small-sized hospitals while developing countries should continue rolling ASPs across healthcare facilities. Additionally, the future of ASPs should focus on embracing evolving information technology to bridge the gaps in knowledge, skills, and attitude, as well as to enhance appropriate decision making.

AB - Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASP) were introduced in healthcare as a public health priority to promote appropriate prescribing of antimicrobials, to reduce adverse events related to antimicrobials, as well as to control the escalating challenges of antimicrobial resistance. To deliver aimed outcome objectives, ASPs involve multiple connected implementation process measures. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate both concepts of ASPs. Guided by PRISMA frames, published systematic reviews (SR) focusing on ASPs restricted to secondary and tertiary healthcare were evaluated over the past 10 years involving all age groups. Out of 265 identified SR studies, 63 met the inclusion criteria. The majority were conducted in Europe and North America, with limited studies from other regions. In the reviewed studies, all age groups were examined, although they were conducted mainly on adults when compared to children and infants. Both process and outcomes measures of ASPs were examined equally and simultaneously through 25 different concepts, dominated by efficacy, antimicrobial resistance, and economic impact, while information technology as well as role of pharmacy and behavioral factors were equally examined. The main broad conclusions from the review were that, across the globe, ASPs demonstrated effectiveness, proved efficacy, and confirmed efficiency, while focused evaluation advocated that developed countries should target medium- and small-sized hospitals while developing countries should continue rolling ASPs across healthcare facilities. Additionally, the future of ASPs should focus on embracing evolving information technology to bridge the gaps in knowledge, skills, and attitude, as well as to enhance appropriate decision making.

KW - Pharmacology (medical)

KW - Infectious Diseases

KW - Microbiology (medical)

KW - General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics

KW - Biochemistry

KW - Microbiology

U2 - 10.3390/antibiotics13030253

DO - 10.3390/antibiotics13030253

M3 - Journal article

VL - 13

JO - Antibiotics

JF - Antibiotics

SN - 2079-6382

IS - 3

M1 - 253

ER -