Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Evidence for three distinct climate change audi...

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • Andreotta.et.al.22.CC

    Accepted author manuscript, 108 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Evidence for three distinct climate change audience segments with varying belief updating tendencies: Implications for climate change communication

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Evidence for three distinct climate change audience segments with varying belief updating tendencies: Implications for climate change communication. / Andreotta, Matthew; Boschetti, Fabio; Farrell, Simon et al.
In: Climatic Change, Vol. 174, 32, 31.10.2022.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Andreotta M, Boschetti F, Farrell S, Paris C, Hurlstone M. Evidence for three distinct climate change audience segments with varying belief updating tendencies: Implications for climate change communication. Climatic Change. 2022 Oct 31;174:32. doi: 10.1007/s10584-022-03437-5

Author

Andreotta, Matthew ; Boschetti, Fabio ; Farrell, Simon et al. / Evidence for three distinct climate change audience segments with varying belief updating tendencies : Implications for climate change communication. In: Climatic Change. 2022 ; Vol. 174.

Bibtex

@article{a8f6ebbba4194b2d840564b9d6c02544,
title = "Evidence for three distinct climate change audience segments with varying belief updating tendencies: Implications for climate change communication",
abstract = "Mounting evidence suggests members of the general public are not homogeneous in their receptivity to climate science information. Studies segmenting climate change views typically deploy a top-down approach, whereby concepts salient in scientific literature determine the number and nature of segments. In contrast, in two studies using Australian citizens, we used a bottom-up approach, in which segments were determined from perceptions of climate change concepts derived from citizen social media discourse. In Study 1, we identified three segments of the Australian public (Acceptors, Fencesitters, and Sceptics) and their psychological characteristics. We find segments differ in climate change concern and scepticism, mental models of climate, political ideology, and worldviews. In Study 2, we examined whether reception to scientific information differed across segments using a belief-updating task. Participants reported their beliefs concerning the causes of climate change, the likelihood climate change will have specific impacts, and the effectiveness of Australia{\textquoteright}s mitigation policy. Next, participants were provided with the actual scientific estimates for each event and asked to provide new estimates. We find significant heterogeneity in the belief-updating tendencies of the three segments that can be understood with reference to their different psychological characteristics. Our results suggest tailored scientific communications informed by the psychological profiles of different segments may be more effective than a “one-size-fits-all” approach. Using our novel audience segmentation analysis, we provide some practical suggestions regarding how communication strategies can be improved by accounting for segments{\textquoteright} characteristics.",
author = "Matthew Andreotta and Fabio Boschetti and Simon Farrell and Cecile Paris and Mark Hurlstone",
year = "2022",
month = oct,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1007/s10584-022-03437-5",
language = "English",
volume = "174",
journal = "Climatic Change",
issn = "0165-0009",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence for three distinct climate change audience segments with varying belief updating tendencies

T2 - Implications for climate change communication

AU - Andreotta, Matthew

AU - Boschetti, Fabio

AU - Farrell, Simon

AU - Paris, Cecile

AU - Hurlstone, Mark

PY - 2022/10/31

Y1 - 2022/10/31

N2 - Mounting evidence suggests members of the general public are not homogeneous in their receptivity to climate science information. Studies segmenting climate change views typically deploy a top-down approach, whereby concepts salient in scientific literature determine the number and nature of segments. In contrast, in two studies using Australian citizens, we used a bottom-up approach, in which segments were determined from perceptions of climate change concepts derived from citizen social media discourse. In Study 1, we identified three segments of the Australian public (Acceptors, Fencesitters, and Sceptics) and their psychological characteristics. We find segments differ in climate change concern and scepticism, mental models of climate, political ideology, and worldviews. In Study 2, we examined whether reception to scientific information differed across segments using a belief-updating task. Participants reported their beliefs concerning the causes of climate change, the likelihood climate change will have specific impacts, and the effectiveness of Australia’s mitigation policy. Next, participants were provided with the actual scientific estimates for each event and asked to provide new estimates. We find significant heterogeneity in the belief-updating tendencies of the three segments that can be understood with reference to their different psychological characteristics. Our results suggest tailored scientific communications informed by the psychological profiles of different segments may be more effective than a “one-size-fits-all” approach. Using our novel audience segmentation analysis, we provide some practical suggestions regarding how communication strategies can be improved by accounting for segments’ characteristics.

AB - Mounting evidence suggests members of the general public are not homogeneous in their receptivity to climate science information. Studies segmenting climate change views typically deploy a top-down approach, whereby concepts salient in scientific literature determine the number and nature of segments. In contrast, in two studies using Australian citizens, we used a bottom-up approach, in which segments were determined from perceptions of climate change concepts derived from citizen social media discourse. In Study 1, we identified three segments of the Australian public (Acceptors, Fencesitters, and Sceptics) and their psychological characteristics. We find segments differ in climate change concern and scepticism, mental models of climate, political ideology, and worldviews. In Study 2, we examined whether reception to scientific information differed across segments using a belief-updating task. Participants reported their beliefs concerning the causes of climate change, the likelihood climate change will have specific impacts, and the effectiveness of Australia’s mitigation policy. Next, participants were provided with the actual scientific estimates for each event and asked to provide new estimates. We find significant heterogeneity in the belief-updating tendencies of the three segments that can be understood with reference to their different psychological characteristics. Our results suggest tailored scientific communications informed by the psychological profiles of different segments may be more effective than a “one-size-fits-all” approach. Using our novel audience segmentation analysis, we provide some practical suggestions regarding how communication strategies can be improved by accounting for segments’ characteristics.

U2 - 10.1007/s10584-022-03437-5

DO - 10.1007/s10584-022-03437-5

M3 - Journal article

VL - 174

JO - Climatic Change

JF - Climatic Change

SN - 0165-0009

M1 - 32

ER -