Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Evolving grounded theory methodology : towards ...
View graph of relations

Evolving grounded theory methodology : towards a discursive approach.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Evolving grounded theory methodology : towards a discursive approach. / McCreaddie, May; Payne, Sheila.
In: International Journal of Nursing Studies, Vol. 47, No. 6, 06.2010, p. 781-793.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

McCreaddie, M & Payne, S 2010, 'Evolving grounded theory methodology : towards a discursive approach.', International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 781-793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.11.006

APA

Vancouver

McCreaddie M, Payne S. Evolving grounded theory methodology : towards a discursive approach. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2010 Jun;47(6):781-793. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.11.006

Author

McCreaddie, May ; Payne, Sheila. / Evolving grounded theory methodology : towards a discursive approach. In: International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2010 ; Vol. 47, No. 6. pp. 781-793.

Bibtex

@article{264acddef6de4d5e993b18a37293baac,
title = "Evolving grounded theory methodology : towards a discursive approach.",
abstract = "Grounded Theory Methodology (GTM) is a widely cited research approach based upon symbolic interaction with a focus on interaction, action and processes. Relatively recently, Discursive Psychology; a language-based interaction research approach also based on symbolic interaction, emerged. At present Discursive Psychology is principally cited in the social sciences literature. Given Discursive Psychology's symbolic interaction foundations, what relevance does this approach have for evolving GTM? A number of methodological challenges were posed by a study looking at humour in Clinical Nurse Specialist–patient interactions. This paper will use the phenomenon of spontaneous humour in healthcare interactions to illustrate the potential for a new form of GTM drawing on discursive approaches; Discursive GTM. First, the challenges presented by a study looking at spontaneous humour in Clinical Nurse Specialist–patient interactions are presented. Second, the research approach adopted to meet these challenges – Discursive GTM (DGTM) – is explicated and the results of the study are outlined. Third, the different GTM approaches and Discursive Psychology are compared and contrasted in relation to the DGTM approach adopted. Finally, the challenges and tensions of using DGTM as well as the opportunities afforded by the use of naturally occurring data are reviewed. The authors contend that a DGTM approach may be appropriate in analyzing certain phenomena. In particular, we highlight the potential contribution of naturally occurring data as an adjunct to researcher-elicited data. Thus, when exploring particular phenomena, a DGTM approach may address the potentially under-developed symbolic interaction tenet of language.",
keywords = "Grounded Theory Methodology, Discursive Psychology, Ethnomethodology, Humour",
author = "May McCreaddie and Sheila Payne",
year = "2010",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.11.006",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "781--793",
journal = "International Journal of Nursing Studies",
issn = "0020-7489",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evolving grounded theory methodology : towards a discursive approach.

AU - McCreaddie, May

AU - Payne, Sheila

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Grounded Theory Methodology (GTM) is a widely cited research approach based upon symbolic interaction with a focus on interaction, action and processes. Relatively recently, Discursive Psychology; a language-based interaction research approach also based on symbolic interaction, emerged. At present Discursive Psychology is principally cited in the social sciences literature. Given Discursive Psychology's symbolic interaction foundations, what relevance does this approach have for evolving GTM? A number of methodological challenges were posed by a study looking at humour in Clinical Nurse Specialist–patient interactions. This paper will use the phenomenon of spontaneous humour in healthcare interactions to illustrate the potential for a new form of GTM drawing on discursive approaches; Discursive GTM. First, the challenges presented by a study looking at spontaneous humour in Clinical Nurse Specialist–patient interactions are presented. Second, the research approach adopted to meet these challenges – Discursive GTM (DGTM) – is explicated and the results of the study are outlined. Third, the different GTM approaches and Discursive Psychology are compared and contrasted in relation to the DGTM approach adopted. Finally, the challenges and tensions of using DGTM as well as the opportunities afforded by the use of naturally occurring data are reviewed. The authors contend that a DGTM approach may be appropriate in analyzing certain phenomena. In particular, we highlight the potential contribution of naturally occurring data as an adjunct to researcher-elicited data. Thus, when exploring particular phenomena, a DGTM approach may address the potentially under-developed symbolic interaction tenet of language.

AB - Grounded Theory Methodology (GTM) is a widely cited research approach based upon symbolic interaction with a focus on interaction, action and processes. Relatively recently, Discursive Psychology; a language-based interaction research approach also based on symbolic interaction, emerged. At present Discursive Psychology is principally cited in the social sciences literature. Given Discursive Psychology's symbolic interaction foundations, what relevance does this approach have for evolving GTM? A number of methodological challenges were posed by a study looking at humour in Clinical Nurse Specialist–patient interactions. This paper will use the phenomenon of spontaneous humour in healthcare interactions to illustrate the potential for a new form of GTM drawing on discursive approaches; Discursive GTM. First, the challenges presented by a study looking at spontaneous humour in Clinical Nurse Specialist–patient interactions are presented. Second, the research approach adopted to meet these challenges – Discursive GTM (DGTM) – is explicated and the results of the study are outlined. Third, the different GTM approaches and Discursive Psychology are compared and contrasted in relation to the DGTM approach adopted. Finally, the challenges and tensions of using DGTM as well as the opportunities afforded by the use of naturally occurring data are reviewed. The authors contend that a DGTM approach may be appropriate in analyzing certain phenomena. In particular, we highlight the potential contribution of naturally occurring data as an adjunct to researcher-elicited data. Thus, when exploring particular phenomena, a DGTM approach may address the potentially under-developed symbolic interaction tenet of language.

KW - Grounded Theory Methodology

KW - Discursive Psychology

KW - Ethnomethodology

KW - Humour

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.11.006

DO - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.11.006

M3 - Journal article

VL - 47

SP - 781

EP - 793

JO - International Journal of Nursing Studies

JF - International Journal of Nursing Studies

SN - 0020-7489

IS - 6

ER -