Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Examining the state of adult social care resear...
View graph of relations

Examining the state of adult social care research 1990-2001: a systematic synthesis of research methods and quality

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Examining the state of adult social care research 1990-2001: a systematic synthesis of research methods and quality. / Reilly, Siobhan; Cheng, Xie; Jacobs, Sally et al.
In: Evidence and Policy : A Journal of Research Debate and Practice, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2008, p. 155-182.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Reilly, S, Cheng, X, Jacobs, S & Challis, D 2008, 'Examining the state of adult social care research 1990-2001: a systematic synthesis of research methods and quality', Evidence and Policy : A Journal of Research Debate and Practice, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 155-182. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426408X355542

APA

Reilly, S., Cheng, X., Jacobs, S., & Challis, D. (2008). Examining the state of adult social care research 1990-2001: a systematic synthesis of research methods and quality. Evidence and Policy : A Journal of Research Debate and Practice, 4(3), 155-182. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426408X355542

Vancouver

Reilly S, Cheng X, Jacobs S, Challis D. Examining the state of adult social care research 1990-2001: a systematic synthesis of research methods and quality. Evidence and Policy : A Journal of Research Debate and Practice. 2008;4(3):155-182. doi: 10.1332/174426408X355542

Author

Reilly, Siobhan ; Cheng, Xie ; Jacobs, Sally et al. / Examining the state of adult social care research 1990-2001 : a systematic synthesis of research methods and quality. In: Evidence and Policy : A Journal of Research Debate and Practice. 2008 ; Vol. 4, No. 3. pp. 155-182.

Bibtex

@article{36085ccd3c4f4550adf120ed8def4f60,
title = "Examining the state of adult social care research 1990-2001: a systematic synthesis of research methods and quality",
abstract = "This article reports on a systematic synthesis of the research methods and quality of peer reviewed empirical research relating to adult social care services (1990-2001). The range of research questions, research designs and methodological quality varied within and across four service user groups. Factors associated with variation in methodological quality included the type of research question, strategies and designs adopted, service user group, number of authors, unit of analysis and year of publication. The findings demonstrated a dearth of rigorous social care evaluations in the UK. These findings contribute to current initiatives aimed at improving the standard of health and social care research. ",
keywords = " METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY, RESEARCH METHODS, SOCIAL CARE, SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ",
author = "Siobhan Reilly and Xie Cheng and Sally Jacobs and David Challis",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1332/174426408X355542",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "155--182",
journal = "Evidence and Policy : A Journal of Research Debate and Practice",
issn = "1744-2648",
publisher = "Policy Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining the state of adult social care research 1990-2001

T2 - a systematic synthesis of research methods and quality

AU - Reilly, Siobhan

AU - Cheng, Xie

AU - Jacobs, Sally

AU - Challis, David

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - This article reports on a systematic synthesis of the research methods and quality of peer reviewed empirical research relating to adult social care services (1990-2001). The range of research questions, research designs and methodological quality varied within and across four service user groups. Factors associated with variation in methodological quality included the type of research question, strategies and designs adopted, service user group, number of authors, unit of analysis and year of publication. The findings demonstrated a dearth of rigorous social care evaluations in the UK. These findings contribute to current initiatives aimed at improving the standard of health and social care research.

AB - This article reports on a systematic synthesis of the research methods and quality of peer reviewed empirical research relating to adult social care services (1990-2001). The range of research questions, research designs and methodological quality varied within and across four service user groups. Factors associated with variation in methodological quality included the type of research question, strategies and designs adopted, service user group, number of authors, unit of analysis and year of publication. The findings demonstrated a dearth of rigorous social care evaluations in the UK. These findings contribute to current initiatives aimed at improving the standard of health and social care research.

KW - METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY

KW - RESEARCH METHODS

KW - SOCIAL CARE

KW - SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

U2 - 10.1332/174426408X355542

DO - 10.1332/174426408X355542

M3 - Journal article

VL - 4

SP - 155

EP - 182

JO - Evidence and Policy : A Journal of Research Debate and Practice

JF - Evidence and Policy : A Journal of Research Debate and Practice

SN - 1744-2648

IS - 3

ER -