Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > ‘Except that Joss Whedon is god’

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

‘Except that Joss Whedon is god’: Fannish attitudes to statements of author/ity

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

‘Except that Joss Whedon is god’: Fannish attitudes to statements of author/ity. / Fathallah, Judith.
In: International Journal of Cultural Studies, Vol. 19, No. 4, 01.07.2016, p. 459-476.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Fathallah J. ‘Except that Joss Whedon is god’: Fannish attitudes to statements of author/ity. International Journal of Cultural Studies. 2016 Jul 1;19(4):459-476. Epub 2014 Jun 13. doi: 10.1177/1367877914537589

Author

Fathallah, Judith. / ‘Except that Joss Whedon is god’ : Fannish attitudes to statements of author/ity. In: International Journal of Cultural Studies. 2016 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 459-476.

Bibtex

@article{32b5fa63b71d493bb22ae5ce1931fdd6,
title = "{\textquoteleft}Except that Joss Whedon is god{\textquoteright}: Fannish attitudes to statements of author/ity",
abstract = "Early internet and fan studies theorists believed the New Media context and work of the active fan would bring theories like the Death of the Author to fruition. Contemporary fan studies scholars are more reserved, acknowledging diversity in fan attitudes. Through analysis of a LiveJournal article with comments on authors{\textquoteright} views concerning fanfiction, this article demonstrates the paradoxical investment in various forms of authorial authority espoused across fan communities, as well as defiance and repudiation of them. I argue that while the authors quoted are denied legitimate authority through various tactics, the concept of an originating, proprietary authorship, with attendant capitalist powers and rights, retains much influence. The concept of the author holds more power than the individual figures attempting to wield it, and fans attribute or deny the power of authorship to particular figures according to their public personas and cultural politics. In this sense, fans may withhold or bestow legitimation through the operation of Foucault{\textquoteright}s author-function, interpreting text and statements of authority through the public persona of the author.",
author = "Judith Fathallah",
year = "2016",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1367877914537589",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "459--476",
journal = "International Journal of Cultural Studies",
issn = "1367-8779",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘Except that Joss Whedon is god’

T2 - Fannish attitudes to statements of author/ity

AU - Fathallah, Judith

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Early internet and fan studies theorists believed the New Media context and work of the active fan would bring theories like the Death of the Author to fruition. Contemporary fan studies scholars are more reserved, acknowledging diversity in fan attitudes. Through analysis of a LiveJournal article with comments on authors’ views concerning fanfiction, this article demonstrates the paradoxical investment in various forms of authorial authority espoused across fan communities, as well as defiance and repudiation of them. I argue that while the authors quoted are denied legitimate authority through various tactics, the concept of an originating, proprietary authorship, with attendant capitalist powers and rights, retains much influence. The concept of the author holds more power than the individual figures attempting to wield it, and fans attribute or deny the power of authorship to particular figures according to their public personas and cultural politics. In this sense, fans may withhold or bestow legitimation through the operation of Foucault’s author-function, interpreting text and statements of authority through the public persona of the author.

AB - Early internet and fan studies theorists believed the New Media context and work of the active fan would bring theories like the Death of the Author to fruition. Contemporary fan studies scholars are more reserved, acknowledging diversity in fan attitudes. Through analysis of a LiveJournal article with comments on authors’ views concerning fanfiction, this article demonstrates the paradoxical investment in various forms of authorial authority espoused across fan communities, as well as defiance and repudiation of them. I argue that while the authors quoted are denied legitimate authority through various tactics, the concept of an originating, proprietary authorship, with attendant capitalist powers and rights, retains much influence. The concept of the author holds more power than the individual figures attempting to wield it, and fans attribute or deny the power of authorship to particular figures according to their public personas and cultural politics. In this sense, fans may withhold or bestow legitimation through the operation of Foucault’s author-function, interpreting text and statements of authority through the public persona of the author.

U2 - 10.1177/1367877914537589

DO - 10.1177/1367877914537589

M3 - Journal article

VL - 19

SP - 459

EP - 476

JO - International Journal of Cultural Studies

JF - International Journal of Cultural Studies

SN - 1367-8779

IS - 4

ER -