Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Executive Compensation and Incentives
View graph of relations

Executive Compensation and Incentives

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Executive Compensation and Incentives. / Conyon, Martin.
In: Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 20, 2006, p. 25-44.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Conyon, M 2006, 'Executive Compensation and Incentives', Academy of Management Perspectives, vol. 20, pp. 25-44.

APA

Conyon, M. (2006). Executive Compensation and Incentives. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20, 25-44.

Vancouver

Conyon M. Executive Compensation and Incentives. Academy of Management Perspectives. 2006;20:25-44.

Author

Conyon, Martin. / Executive Compensation and Incentives. In: Academy of Management Perspectives. 2006 ; Vol. 20. pp. 25-44.

Bibtex

@article{bee2d0e604a24899a5f5f1d50461dee6,
title = "Executive Compensation and Incentives",
abstract = "The objective of a properly designed executive compensation package is to attract, retain, and motivate CEOs and senior management. The standard economic approach for understanding executive pay is the principal-agent model. This paper documents the changes in executive pay and incentives in U.S. firms between 1993 and 2003. We consider reasons for these transformations, including agency theory, changes in the managerial labor markets, shifts in firm strategy, and theories concerning managerial power. We show that boards and compensation committees have become more independent over time. In addition, we demonstrate that compensation committees containing affiliated directors do not set greater pay or fewer incentives.",
author = "Martin Conyon",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "25--44",
journal = "Academy of Management Perspectives",
issn = "1558-9080",
publisher = "Academy of Management",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Executive Compensation and Incentives

AU - Conyon, Martin

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - The objective of a properly designed executive compensation package is to attract, retain, and motivate CEOs and senior management. The standard economic approach for understanding executive pay is the principal-agent model. This paper documents the changes in executive pay and incentives in U.S. firms between 1993 and 2003. We consider reasons for these transformations, including agency theory, changes in the managerial labor markets, shifts in firm strategy, and theories concerning managerial power. We show that boards and compensation committees have become more independent over time. In addition, we demonstrate that compensation committees containing affiliated directors do not set greater pay or fewer incentives.

AB - The objective of a properly designed executive compensation package is to attract, retain, and motivate CEOs and senior management. The standard economic approach for understanding executive pay is the principal-agent model. This paper documents the changes in executive pay and incentives in U.S. firms between 1993 and 2003. We consider reasons for these transformations, including agency theory, changes in the managerial labor markets, shifts in firm strategy, and theories concerning managerial power. We show that boards and compensation committees have become more independent over time. In addition, we demonstrate that compensation committees containing affiliated directors do not set greater pay or fewer incentives.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 20

SP - 25

EP - 44

JO - Academy of Management Perspectives

JF - Academy of Management Perspectives

SN - 1558-9080

ER -