Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Explaining behavior change after genetic testing
View graph of relations

Explaining behavior change after genetic testing: the problem of collinearity between test and risk estimates

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Explaining behavior change after genetic testing: the problem of collinearity between test and risk estimates. / Fanshawe, Thomas; Prevost, Toby; Roberts, Scott et al.
In: Genetic Testing, Vol. 12, No. 3, 09.2008, p. 381-386.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Fanshawe, T, Prevost, T, Roberts, S, Green, R, Armstrong, D & Marteau, T 2008, 'Explaining behavior change after genetic testing: the problem of collinearity between test and risk estimates', Genetic Testing, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 381-386. https://doi.org/10.1089/gte.2007.0103

APA

Fanshawe, T., Prevost, T., Roberts, S., Green, R., Armstrong, D., & Marteau, T. (2008). Explaining behavior change after genetic testing: the problem of collinearity between test and risk estimates. Genetic Testing, 12(3), 381-386. https://doi.org/10.1089/gte.2007.0103

Vancouver

Fanshawe T, Prevost T, Roberts S, Green R, Armstrong D, Marteau T. Explaining behavior change after genetic testing: the problem of collinearity between test and risk estimates. Genetic Testing. 2008 Sept;12(3):381-386. doi: 10.1089/gte.2007.0103

Author

Fanshawe, Thomas ; Prevost, Toby ; Roberts, Scott et al. / Explaining behavior change after genetic testing : the problem of collinearity between test and risk estimates. In: Genetic Testing. 2008 ; Vol. 12, No. 3. pp. 381-386.

Bibtex

@article{0baabe5439a84c84b2d8221fdf434b1b,
title = "Explaining behavior change after genetic testing: the problem of collinearity between test and risk estimates",
abstract = "This paper explores whether and how the behavioral impact of genotype disclosure can be disentangled from the impact of numerical risk estimates generated by genetic tests. Secondary data analyses are presented from a randomized controlled trial of 162 first-degree relatives of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. Each participant received a lifetime risk estimate of AD. Control group estimates were based on age, gender, family history, and assumed ε4-negative apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype; intervention group estimates were based upon the first three variables plus true APOE genotype, which was also disclosed. AD-specific self-reported behavior change (diet, exercise, and medication use) was assessed at 12 months. Behavior change was significantly more likely with increasing risk estimates, and also more likely, but not significantly so, in ε4-positive intervention group participants (53% changed behavior) than in control group participants (31%). Intervention group participants receiving ε4-negative genotype feedback (24% changed behavior) and control group participants had similar rates of behavior change and risk estimates, the latter allowing assessment of the independent effects of genotype disclosure. However, collinearity between risk estimates and ε4-positive genotypes, which engender high-risk estimates, prevented assessment of the independent effect of the disclosure of an ε4 genotype. Novel study designs are proposed to determine whether genotype disclosure has an impact upon behavior beyond that of numerical risk estimates.",
author = "Thomas Fanshawe and Toby Prevost and Scott Roberts and Robert Green and David Armstrong and Theresa Marteau",
year = "2008",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1089/gte.2007.0103",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "381--386",
journal = "Genetic Testing",
issn = "1557-7473",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explaining behavior change after genetic testing

T2 - the problem of collinearity between test and risk estimates

AU - Fanshawe, Thomas

AU - Prevost, Toby

AU - Roberts, Scott

AU - Green, Robert

AU - Armstrong, David

AU - Marteau, Theresa

PY - 2008/9

Y1 - 2008/9

N2 - This paper explores whether and how the behavioral impact of genotype disclosure can be disentangled from the impact of numerical risk estimates generated by genetic tests. Secondary data analyses are presented from a randomized controlled trial of 162 first-degree relatives of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. Each participant received a lifetime risk estimate of AD. Control group estimates were based on age, gender, family history, and assumed ε4-negative apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype; intervention group estimates were based upon the first three variables plus true APOE genotype, which was also disclosed. AD-specific self-reported behavior change (diet, exercise, and medication use) was assessed at 12 months. Behavior change was significantly more likely with increasing risk estimates, and also more likely, but not significantly so, in ε4-positive intervention group participants (53% changed behavior) than in control group participants (31%). Intervention group participants receiving ε4-negative genotype feedback (24% changed behavior) and control group participants had similar rates of behavior change and risk estimates, the latter allowing assessment of the independent effects of genotype disclosure. However, collinearity between risk estimates and ε4-positive genotypes, which engender high-risk estimates, prevented assessment of the independent effect of the disclosure of an ε4 genotype. Novel study designs are proposed to determine whether genotype disclosure has an impact upon behavior beyond that of numerical risk estimates.

AB - This paper explores whether and how the behavioral impact of genotype disclosure can be disentangled from the impact of numerical risk estimates generated by genetic tests. Secondary data analyses are presented from a randomized controlled trial of 162 first-degree relatives of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. Each participant received a lifetime risk estimate of AD. Control group estimates were based on age, gender, family history, and assumed ε4-negative apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype; intervention group estimates were based upon the first three variables plus true APOE genotype, which was also disclosed. AD-specific self-reported behavior change (diet, exercise, and medication use) was assessed at 12 months. Behavior change was significantly more likely with increasing risk estimates, and also more likely, but not significantly so, in ε4-positive intervention group participants (53% changed behavior) than in control group participants (31%). Intervention group participants receiving ε4-negative genotype feedback (24% changed behavior) and control group participants had similar rates of behavior change and risk estimates, the latter allowing assessment of the independent effects of genotype disclosure. However, collinearity between risk estimates and ε4-positive genotypes, which engender high-risk estimates, prevented assessment of the independent effect of the disclosure of an ε4 genotype. Novel study designs are proposed to determine whether genotype disclosure has an impact upon behavior beyond that of numerical risk estimates.

U2 - 10.1089/gte.2007.0103

DO - 10.1089/gte.2007.0103

M3 - Journal article

VL - 12

SP - 381

EP - 386

JO - Genetic Testing

JF - Genetic Testing

SN - 1557-7473

IS - 3

ER -